scholarly journals Phase separation by the Sterile Alpha Motif of Polyhomeotic compartmentalizes Polycomb Group proteins and enhances their activity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Seif ◽  
Jin Joo Kang ◽  
Charles Sasseville ◽  
Olga Senkovitch ◽  
Alexander Kaltashov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Multiple Scales ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
Sterile Alpha Motif ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase Activity ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Effects Of Ph

AbstractPolycomb Group (PcG) proteins organize chromatin at multiple scales to regulate gene expression. A conserved Sterile Alpha Motif (SAM) in the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) subunit Polyhomeotic (Ph) is important for chromatin compaction and large-scale chromatin organization. Like many SAMs, Ph SAM forms helical head to tail polymers, and SAM-SAM interactions between chromatin-bound Ph/PRC1 are believed to compact chromatin and mediate long-range interactions. To understand mechanistically how this occurs, we analyzed the effects of Ph SAM on chromatin in vitro. We find that incubation of chromatin or DNA with a truncated Ph protein containing the SAM results in formation of concentrated, phase-separated condensates. Condensate formation depends on Ph SAM, and is enhanced by but not strictly dependent on, its polymerization activity. Ph SAM-dependent condensates can recruit PRC1 from extracts and enhance PRC1 ubiquitin ligase activity towards histone H2A. Overexpression of Ph with an intact SAM increases ubiquitylated H2A in cells. Thus, phase separation is an activity of the SAM, which, in the context of Ph, can mediate large-scale compaction of chromatin into biochemical compartments that facilitate histone modification.

scholarly journals Phase separation by the polyhomeotic sterile alpha motif compartmentalizes Polycomb Group proteins and enhances their activity

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Seif ◽  
Jin Joo Kang ◽  
Charles Sasseville ◽  
Olga Senkovich ◽  
Alexander Kaltashov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Multiple Scales ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
Sterile Alpha Motif ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase Activity ◽  
Effects Of Ph

Abstract Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins organize chromatin at multiple scales to regulate gene expression. A conserved Sterile Alpha Motif (SAM) in the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) subunit Polyhomeotic (Ph) has been shown to play an important role in chromatin compaction and large-scale chromatin organization. Ph SAM forms helical head to tail polymers, and SAM-SAM interactions between chromatin-bound Ph/PRC1 are believed to compact chromatin and mediate long-range interactions. To understand the underlying mechanism, here we analyze the effects of Ph SAM on chromatin in vitro. We find that incubation of chromatin or DNA with a truncated Ph protein containing the SAM results in formation of concentrated, phase-separated condensates. Ph SAM-dependent condensates can recruit PRC1 from extracts and enhance PRC1 ubiquitin ligase activity towards histone H2A. We show that overexpression of Ph with an intact SAM increases ubiquitylated H2A in cells. Thus, SAM-induced phase separation, in the context of Ph, can mediate large-scale compaction of chromatin into biochemical compartments that facilitate histone modification.

scholarly journals Nuclear condensates of the Polycomb protein chromobox 2 (CBX2) assemble through phase separation

2018 ◽  
Vol 294 (5) ◽  
pp. 1451-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roubina Tatavosian ◽  
Samantha Kent ◽  
Kyle Brown ◽  
Tingting Yao ◽  
Huy Nguyen Duc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Polycomb Protein ◽  
Condensate Formation

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins repress master regulators of development and differentiation through organization of chromatin structure. Mutation and dysregulation of PcG genes cause developmental defects and cancer. PcG proteins form condensates in the cell nucleus, and these condensates are the physical sites of PcG-targeted gene silencing via formation of facultative heterochromatin. However, the physiochemical principles underlying the formation of PcG condensates remain unknown, and their determination could shed light on how these condensates compact chromatin. Using fluorescence live-cell imaging, we observed that the Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) protein chromobox 2 (CBX2), a member of the CBX protein family, undergoes phase separation to form condensates and that the CBX2 condensates exhibit liquid-like properties. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we demonstrated that the conserved residues of CBX2 within the intrinsically disordered region (IDR), which is the region for compaction of chromatin in vitro, promote the condensate formation both in vitro and in vivo. We showed that the CBX2 condensates concentrate DNA and nucleosomes. Using genetic engineering, we report that trimethylation of Lys-27 at histone H3 (H3K27me3), a marker of heterochromatin formation produced by PRC2, had minimal effects on the CBX2 condensate formation. We further demonstrated that the CBX2 condensate formation does not require CBX2–PRC1 subunits; however, the condensate formation of CBX2–PRC1 subunits depends on CBX2, suggesting a mechanism underlying the assembly of CBX2–PRC1 condensates. In summary, our results reveal that PcG condensates assemble through liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) and suggest that phase-separated condensates can organize PcG-bound chromatin.

scholarly journals Polycomb Cbx2 Condensates Assemble through Phase Separation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roubina Tatavosian ◽  
Samantha Kent ◽  
Kyle Brown ◽  
Tingting Yao ◽  
Huy Nguyen Duc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Development And Differentiation ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

AbstractPolycomb group (PcG) proteins are master regulators of development and differentiation. Mutation and dysregulation of PcG genes cause developmental defects and cancer. PcG proteins form condensates in the nucleus of cells and these condensates are the physical sites of PcG-targeted gene silencing. However, the physiochemical principles underlying the PcG condensate formation remain unknown. Here we show that Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) protein Cbx2, one member of the Cbx family proteins, contains a long stretch of intrinsically disordered region (IDR). Cbx2 undergoes phase separation to form condensates. Cbx2 condensates exhibit liquid-like properties and can concentrate DNA and nucleosomes. We demonstrate that the conserved residues within the IDR promote the condensate formation in vitro and in vivo. We further indicate that H3K27me3 has minimal effects on the Cbx2 condensate formation while depletion of core PRC1 subunits facilitates the condensate formation. Thus, our results reveal that PcG condensates assemble through liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and suggest that PcG-bound chromatin is in part organized through phase-separated condensates.

scholarly journals Membrane-associated phase separation: organization and function emerge from a two-dimensional milieu

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathon A Ditlev
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Cellular Environment ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
Available Technology ◽  
And Function ◽  
Surrounding Membrane

Abstract Liquid‒liquid phase separation (LLPS) of biomolecules has emerged as an important mechanism that contributes to cellular organization. Phase separated biomolecular condensates, or membrane-less organelles, are compartments composed of specific biomolecules without a surrounding membrane in the nucleus and cytoplasm. LLPS also occurs at membranes, where both lipids and membrane-associated proteins can de-mix to form phase separated compartments. Investigation of these membrane-associated condensates using in vitro biochemical reconstitution and cell biology has provided key insights into the role of phase separation in membrane domain formation and function. However, these studies have generally been limited by available technology to study LLPS on model membranes and the complex cellular environment that regulates condensate formation, composition, and function. Here, I briefly review our current understanding of membrane-associated condensates, establish why LLPS can be advantageous for certain membrane-associated condensates, and offer a perspective for how these condensates may be studied in the future.

scholarly journals Concentration and dosage sensitivity of proteins driving liquid-liquid phase separation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nazanin Farahi ◽  
Tamas Lazar ◽  
Shoshana J. Wodak ◽  
Peter Tompa ◽  
Rita Pancsa
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Liquid Phase ◽  
Liquid Phase Separation ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation ◽  
In Cells ◽  
Dosage Sensitivity

AbstractLiquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a molecular process that leads to the formation of membraneless organelles (MLOs), i.e. functionally specialized liquid-like cellular condensates formed by proteins and nucleic acids. Integration of data on LLPS-associated proteins from dedicated databases revealed only modest overlap between them and resulted in a confident set of 89 human LLPS driver proteins. Since LLPS is highly concentration-sensitive, the underlying experiments are often criticized for applying higher-than-physiological protein concentrations. To clarify this issue, we performed a naive comparison of in vitro applied and quantitative proteomics-derived protein concentrations and discuss a number of considerations that rationalize the choice of apparently high in vitro concentrations in most LLPS studies. The validity of in vitro LLPS experiments is further supported by in vivo phase-separation experiments and by the observation that the corresponding genes show a strong propensity for dosage sensitivity. This observation implies that the availability of the respective proteins is tightly regulated in cells to avoid erroneous condensate formation. In all, we propose that although local protein concentrations are practically impossible to determine in cells, proteomics-derived cellular concentrations should rather be considered as lower limits of protein concentrations, than strict upper bounds, to be respected by in vitro experiments.

Association of Polycomb group SUZ12 with WD-repeat protein MEP50 that binds to histone H2A selectively in vitro

2006 ◽  
Vol 345 (3) ◽  
pp. 1051-1058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Furuno ◽  
Toshihiro Masatsugu ◽  
Miki Sonoda ◽  
Takehiko Sasazuki ◽  
Ken Yamamoto
Keyword(s):  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
Repeat Protein ◽  
Wd Repeat

scholarly journals Integration of Data from Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation Databases Highlights Concentration and Dosage Sensitivity of LLPS Drivers

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 3017
Author(s):  
Nazanin Farahi ◽  
Tamas Lazar ◽  
Shoshana J. Wodak ◽  
Peter Tompa ◽  
Rita Pancsa
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Liquid Phase ◽  
Systematic Difference ◽  
Liquid Phase Separation ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a molecular process that leads to the formation of membraneless organelles, representing functionally specialized liquid-like cellular condensates formed by proteins and nucleic acids. Integrating the data on LLPS-associated proteins from dedicated databases revealed only modest agreement between them and yielded a high-confidence dataset of 89 human LLPS drivers. Analysis of the supporting evidence for our dataset uncovered a systematic and potentially concerning difference between protein concentrations used in a good fraction of the in vitro LLPS experiments, a key parameter that governs the phase behavior, and the proteomics-derived cellular abundance levels of the corresponding proteins. Closer scrutiny of the underlying experimental data enabled us to offer a sound rationale for this systematic difference, which draws on our current understanding of the cellular organization of the proteome and the LLPS process. In support of this rationale, we find that genes coding for our human LLPS drivers tend to be dosage-sensitive, suggesting that their cellular availability is tightly regulated to preserve their functional role in direct or indirect relation to condensate formation. Our analysis offers guideposts for increasing agreement between in vitro and in vivo studies, probing the roles of proteins in LLPS.

scholarly journals The avalanche-like behaviour of large-scale haemodynamic activity from wakefulness to deep sleep

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (158) ◽  
pp. 20190262 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Bocaccio ◽  
C. Pallavicini ◽  
M. N. Castro ◽  
S. M. Sánchez ◽  
G. De Pino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Point Process ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Multiple Scales ◽  
Sleep Stage ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimates ◽  
Scale Free ◽  
Haemodynamic Activity

Increasing evidence suggests that responsiveness is associated with critical or near-critical cortical dynamics, which exhibit scale-free cascades of spatio-temporal activity. These cascades, or ‘avalanches’, have been detected at multiple scales, from in vitro and in vivo microcircuits to voltage imaging and brain-wide functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) recordings. Criticality endows the cortex with certain information-processing capacities postulated as necessary for conscious wakefulness, yet it remains unknown how unresponsiveness impacts on the avalanche-like behaviour of large-scale human haemodynamic activity. We observed a scale-free hierarchy of co-activated connected clusters by applying a point-process transformation to fMRI data recorded during wakefulness and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Maximum-likelihood estimates revealed a significant effect of sleep stage on the scaling parameters of the cluster size power-law distributions. Post hoc statistical tests showed that differences were maximal between wakefulness and N2 sleep. These results were robust against spatial coarse graining, fitting alternative statistical models and different point-process thresholds, and disappeared upon phase shuffling the fMRI time series. Evoked neural bistabilities preventing arousals during N2 sleep do not suffice to explain these differences, which point towards changes in the intrinsic dynamics of the brain that could be necessary to consolidate a state of deep unresponsiveness.

scholarly journals Intrinsically disordered sequences in the Polycomb protein Polyhomeotic regulate condensate formation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibani Kapur ◽  
Elodie Boulier ◽  
Nicole Francis
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Sequence Composition ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Polycomb Protein ◽  
Size Number ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Polycomb Bodies

Abstract The Polycomb group (PcG) complex PRC1 localizes in the nucleus in the form of condensed structures called Polycomb bodies. The PRC1 subunit Polyhomeotic (Ph) contains a polymerizing sterile alpha motif (SAM) that is implicated in both PcG body formation and chromatin organization in Drosophila and mammalian cells. A truncated version of Ph containing the SAM (mini-Ph), forms phase separated condensates with DNA or chromatin in vitro, suggesting PcG bodies may form by phase separation. In cells, Ph forms multiple condensates, while mini-Ph forms a single large nuclear condensate. We therefore hypothesize that sequences outside of mini-Ph are required for proper condensate formation. We identified three distinct Intrinsically Disordered Regions (IDRs) in Ph based on sequence composition and complexity. We tested the role of each IDR in Ph condensates using live imaging of transfected Drosophila S2 cells. We find that each IDR uniquely affects Ph SAM-dependent condensate size, number, and morphology.

scholarly journals Abstract P-24: Microscopic Analyses of Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation Induced by Linker Histone H1.0

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S21-S22
Author(s):  
Olga Geraskina ◽  
Natalya Maluchenko ◽  
Vasily Studitsky ◽  
Nadezhda Gerasimova ◽  
Daria Koshkina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Liquid Phase ◽  
Dynamic Properties ◽  
Chromatin Condensation ◽  
Liquid Phase Separation ◽  
Moderate Rate ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Dividing Cells ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

Background: Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) that leads to the formation of temporary functional domains in cells plays an important role in the processes of chromatin condensation and gene regulation. Earlier, it was demonstrated that histone H1.4 can form LLPS droplets with DNA. In the present work, LLPS was studied for histone H1.0, which is mainly expressed in differentiated and non-dividing cells. H1.0 is involved in cancer development: its amount decreases with the progression of tumor cells to malignancy. Methods: LSM710 confocal microscope (Zeiss) equipped with the 40x/1.2W objective was used to image mixtures of H1.0 with Cy3/Cy5 labeled DNA or nucleosomes in fluorescent and transmitted-light channels at the excitation of 514 nm. The formation of condensates as a result of LLPS was confirmed by salt-jump and FRAP/FLIP experiments. Results: Condensates were not observed when the ratio of negative to positive charges (N/P) in the samples was >1. At N/P~0.7, optically homogeneous droplet-like condensates were found. The appearance of condensates, their size and shape depended on concentrations of H1.0 and DNA. LLPS condensates but not aggregates disappeared by salt-jump to 650 mM NaCl. FRAP/FLIP experiments revealed a moderate rate of fluorescence recovery (τ½22s) indicating moderate DNA mobility of the H1.0-mediated condensates. The appearance of condensates was also observed in the mixtures of H1.0, DNA and Cy3/Cy5-labeled nucleosomes. Nucleosomes were involved in the condensate formation and found to be 2-fold more mobile (τ½10 s) than DNA. Conclusion: LLPS-related properties of H1.0 were studied for DNA and nucleosomes in vitro. Comparison with H1.4 shows that H1.0 forms liquid condensates of approximately the same size. Our result also may indicate that chromatin retains pronounced dynamic properties in H1.0-induced droplets despite the fact that H1.0 induces the formation of more compact chromatin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document