scholarly journals The disordered P granule protein LAF-1 drives phase separation into droplets with tunable viscosity and dynamics

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (23) ◽  
pp. 7189-7194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shana Elbaum-Garfinkle ◽  
Younghoon Kim ◽  
Krzysztof Szczepaniak ◽  
Carlos Chih-Hsiung Chen ◽  
Christian R. Eckmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Phase Boundary ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Driving Forces ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
P Granules ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered

P granules and other RNA/protein bodies are membrane-less organelles that may assemble by intracellular phase separation, similar to the condensation of water vapor into droplets. However, the molecular driving forces and the nature of the condensed phases remain poorly understood. Here, we show that the Caenorhabditis elegans protein LAF-1, a DDX3 RNA helicase found in P granules, phase separates into P granule-like droplets in vitro. We adapt a microrheology technique to precisely measure the viscoelasticity of micrometer-sized LAF-1 droplets, revealing purely viscous properties highly tunable by salt and RNA concentration. RNA decreases viscosity and increases molecular dynamics within the droplet. Single molecule FRET assays suggest that this RNA fluidization results from highly dynamic RNA–protein interactions that emerge close to the droplet phase boundary. We demonstrate than an N-terminal, arginine/glycine rich, intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) domain of LAF-1 is necessary and sufficient for both phase separation and RNA–protein interactions. In vivo, RNAi knockdown of LAF-1 results in the dissolution of P granules in the early embryo, with an apparent submicromolar phase boundary comparable to that measured in vitro. Together, these findings demonstrate that LAF-1 is important for promoting P granule assembly and provide insight into the mechanism by which IDP-driven molecular interactions give rise to liquid phase organelles with tunable properties.

scholarly journals Spatial patterning of P granules by RNA-induced phase separation of the intrinsically-disordered protein MEG-3

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarrett Smith ◽  
Deepika Calidas ◽  
Helen Schmidt ◽  
Tu Lu ◽  
Dominique Rasoloson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Protein ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
P Granules ◽  
Rna Granules ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Disordered Protein

RNA granules are non-membrane bound cellular compartments that contain RNA and RNA binding proteins. The molecular mechanisms that regulate the spatial distribution of RNA granules in cells are poorly understood. During polarization of the C. elegans zygote, germline RNA granules, called P granules, assemble preferentially in the posterior cytoplasm. We present evidence that P granule asymmetry depends on RNA-induced phase separation of the granule scaffold MEG-3. MEG-3 is an intrinsically disordered protein that binds and phase separates with RNA in vitro. In vivo, MEG-3 forms a posterior-rich concentration gradient that is anti-correlated with a gradient in the RNA-binding protein MEX-5. MEX-5 is necessary and sufficient to suppress MEG-3 granule formation in vivo, and suppresses RNA-induced MEG-3 phase separation in vitro. Our findings suggest that MEX-5 interferes with MEG-3’s access to RNA, thus locally suppressing MEG-3 phase separation to drive P granule asymmetry. Regulated access to RNA, combined with RNA-induced phase separation of key scaffolding proteins, may be a general mechanism for controlling the formation of RNA granules in space and time.

scholarly journals Spatial patterning of P granules by RNA-induced phase separation of the intrinsically-disordered protein MEG-3

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarrett Smith ◽  
Deepika Calidas ◽  
Helen Schmidt ◽  
Tu Lu ◽  
Dominique Rasoloson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Protein ◽  
P Granules ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Rna Granules ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Disordered Protein

ABSTRACTRNA granules are non-membrane bound cellular compartments that contain RNA and RNA binding proteins. The molecular mechanisms that regulate the spatial distribution of RNA granules in cells are poorly understood. During polarization of the C. elegans zygote, germline RNA granules, called P granules, assemble preferentially in the posterior cytoplasm. We present evidence that P granule asymmetry depends on RNA-induced phase separation of the granule scaffold MEG-3. MEG-3 is an intrinsically disordered protein that binds and phase separates with RNA in vitro. In vivo, MEG-3 forms a posterior-rich concentration gradient that is anti-correlated with a gradient in the RNA-binding protein MEX-5. MEX-5 is necessary and sufficient to suppress MEG-3 granule formation in vivo, and suppresses RNA-induced MEG-3 phase separation in vitro. Our findings support a model whereby MEX-5 functions as an mRNA sink to locally suppress MEG-3 phase separation and drive P granule asymmetry.HIGHLIGHTS- The intrinsically-disordered protein MEG-3 is essential for localized assembly of P granules in C. elegans zygotes.- MEG-3 binds RNA and RNA stimulates MEG-3 phase separation.- The RNA-binding protein MEX-5 inhibits MEG-3 granule assembly in the anterior cytoplasm by sequestering RNA.

scholarly journals Nuclear condensates of the Polycomb protein chromobox 2 (CBX2) assemble through phase separation

2018 ◽  
Vol 294 (5) ◽  
pp. 1451-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roubina Tatavosian ◽  
Samantha Kent ◽  
Kyle Brown ◽  
Tingting Yao ◽  
Huy Nguyen Duc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
Heterochromatin Formation ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Polycomb Protein ◽  
Condensate Formation

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins repress master regulators of development and differentiation through organization of chromatin structure. Mutation and dysregulation of PcG genes cause developmental defects and cancer. PcG proteins form condensates in the cell nucleus, and these condensates are the physical sites of PcG-targeted gene silencing via formation of facultative heterochromatin. However, the physiochemical principles underlying the formation of PcG condensates remain unknown, and their determination could shed light on how these condensates compact chromatin. Using fluorescence live-cell imaging, we observed that the Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) protein chromobox 2 (CBX2), a member of the CBX protein family, undergoes phase separation to form condensates and that the CBX2 condensates exhibit liquid-like properties. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we demonstrated that the conserved residues of CBX2 within the intrinsically disordered region (IDR), which is the region for compaction of chromatin in vitro, promote the condensate formation both in vitro and in vivo. We showed that the CBX2 condensates concentrate DNA and nucleosomes. Using genetic engineering, we report that trimethylation of Lys-27 at histone H3 (H3K27me3), a marker of heterochromatin formation produced by PRC2, had minimal effects on the CBX2 condensate formation. We further demonstrated that the CBX2 condensate formation does not require CBX2–PRC1 subunits; however, the condensate formation of CBX2–PRC1 subunits depends on CBX2, suggesting a mechanism underlying the assembly of CBX2–PRC1 condensates. In summary, our results reveal that PcG condensates assemble through liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) and suggest that phase-separated condensates can organize PcG-bound chromatin.

scholarly journals Transcription factor clusters regulate genes in eukaryotic cells

eLife ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam JM Wollman ◽  
Sviatlana Shashkova ◽  
Erik G Hedlund ◽  
Rosmarie Friemann ◽  
Stefan Hohmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Functional Unit ◽  
Yeast Genome ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Extracellular Signal ◽  
Genome Model ◽  
Nuclear Targets

Transcription is regulated through binding factors to gene promoters to activate or repress expression, however, the mechanisms by which factors find targets remain unclear. Using single-molecule fluorescence microscopy, we determined in vivo stoichiometry and spatiotemporal dynamics of a GFP tagged repressor, Mig1, from a paradigm signaling pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find the repressor operates in clusters, which upon extracellular signal detection, translocate from the cytoplasm, bind to nuclear targets and turnover. Simulations of Mig1 configuration within a 3D yeast genome model combined with a promoter-specific, fluorescent translation reporter confirmed clusters are the functional unit of gene regulation. In vitro and structural analysis on reconstituted Mig1 suggests that clusters are stabilized by depletion forces between intrinsically disordered sequences. We observed similar clusters of a co-regulatory activator from a different pathway, supporting a generalized cluster model for transcription factors that reduces promoter search times through intersegment transfer while stabilizing gene expression.

scholarly journals Identifying sequence perturbations to an intrinsically disordered protein that determine its phase-separation behavior

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (21) ◽  
pp. 11421-11431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin S. Schuster ◽  
Gregory L. Dignon ◽  
Wai Shing Tang ◽  
Fleurie M. Kelley ◽  
Aishwarya Kanchi Ranganath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins ◽  
Lipid Membrane ◽  
Coarse Grained ◽  
Disordered Proteins ◽  
Sequence Features ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Arginine Residues

Phase separation of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) commonly underlies the formation of membraneless organelles, which compartmentalize molecules intracellularly in the absence of a lipid membrane. Identifying the protein sequence features responsible for IDP phase separation is critical for understanding physiological roles and pathological consequences of biomolecular condensation, as well as for harnessing phase separation for applications in bioinspired materials design. To expand our knowledge of sequence determinants of IDP phase separation, we characterized variants of the intrinsically disordered RGG domain from LAF-1, a model protein involved in phase separation and a key component of P granules. Based on a predictive coarse-grained IDP model, we identified a region of the RGG domain that has high contact probability and is highly conserved between species; deletion of this region significantly disrupts phase separation in vitro and in vivo. We determined the effects of charge patterning on phase behavior through sequence shuffling. We designed sequences with significantly increased phase separation propensity by shuffling the wild-type sequence, which contains well-mixed charged residues, to increase charge segregation. This result indicates the natural sequence is under negative selection to moderate this mode of interaction. We measured the contributions of tyrosine and arginine residues to phase separation experimentally through mutagenesis studies and computationally through direct interrogation of different modes of interaction using all-atom simulations. Finally, we show that despite these sequence perturbations, the RGG-derived condensates remain liquid-like. Together, these studies advance our fundamental understanding of key biophysical principles and sequence features important to phase separation.

scholarly journals Polycomb Cbx2 Condensates Assemble through Phase Separation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roubina Tatavosian ◽  
Samantha Kent ◽  
Kyle Brown ◽  
Tingting Yao ◽  
Huy Nguyen Duc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Condensate Formation ◽  
Development And Differentiation ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

AbstractPolycomb group (PcG) proteins are master regulators of development and differentiation. Mutation and dysregulation of PcG genes cause developmental defects and cancer. PcG proteins form condensates in the nucleus of cells and these condensates are the physical sites of PcG-targeted gene silencing. However, the physiochemical principles underlying the PcG condensate formation remain unknown. Here we show that Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) protein Cbx2, one member of the Cbx family proteins, contains a long stretch of intrinsically disordered region (IDR). Cbx2 undergoes phase separation to form condensates. Cbx2 condensates exhibit liquid-like properties and can concentrate DNA and nucleosomes. We demonstrate that the conserved residues within the IDR promote the condensate formation in vitro and in vivo. We further indicate that H3K27me3 has minimal effects on the Cbx2 condensate formation while depletion of core PRC1 subunits facilitates the condensate formation. Thus, our results reveal that PcG condensates assemble through liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and suggest that PcG-bound chromatin is in part organized through phase-separated condensates.

scholarly journals The E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MDM2 is a novel interactor of the von Hippel–Lindau tumor suppressor

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonella Falconieri ◽  
Giovanni Minervini ◽  
Raissa Bortolotto ◽  
Damiano Piovesan ◽  
Raffaele Lopreiato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Hypoxia Inducible Factor ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
E3 Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
Von Hippel Lindau ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered

Abstract Mutations of the von Hippel–Lindau (pVHL) tumor suppressor are causative of a familiar predisposition to develop different types of cancer. pVHL is mainly known for its role in regulating hypoxia-inducible factor 1 α (HIF-1α) degradation, thus modulating the hypoxia response. There are different pVHL isoforms, including pVHL30 and pVHL19. However, little is known about isoform-specific functions and protein–protein interactions. Integrating in silico predictions with in vitro and in vivo assays, we describe a novel interaction between pVHL and mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2). We found that pVHL30, and not pVHL19, forms a complex with MDM2, and that the N-terminal acidic tail of pVHL30 is required for its association with MDM2. Further, we demonstrate that an intrinsically disordered region upstream of the tetramerization domain of MDM2 is responsible for its isoform-specific association with pVHL30. This region is highly conserved in higher mammals, including primates, similarly to what has been already shown for the N-terminal tail of pVHL30. Finally, we show that overexpression of pVHL30 and MDM2 together reduces cell metabolic activity and necrosis, suggesting a synergistic effect of these E3 ubiquitin ligases. Collectively, our data show an isoform-specific interaction of pVHL with MDM2, suggesting an interplay between these two E3 ubiquitin ligases.

scholarly journals Coordination of RNA and protein condensation by the P granule protein MEG-3

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Schmidt ◽  
Andrea Putnam ◽  
Dominique Rasoloson ◽  
Geraldine Seydoux
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Protein ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Disordered Protein ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient

ABSTRACTGerm granules are RNA-protein condensates in germ cells. The mechanisms that drive germ granule assembly are not fully understood. MEG-3 is an intrinsically-disordered protein required for germ (P) granule assembly in C. elegans. MEG-3 forms gel-like condensates on liquid condensates assembled by PGL proteins. MEG-3 is related to the GCNA family and contains an N-terminal disordered region (IDR) and a predicted ordered C-terminus featuring an HMG-like motif (HMGL). Using in vitro and in vivo experiments, we find the MEG-3 C-terminus is necessary and sufficient to build MEG-3/PGL co-condensates independent of RNA. The HMGL domain is required for high affinity MEG-3/PGL binding in vitro and for assembly of MEG-3/PGL co-condensates in vivo. The MEG-3 IDR binds RNA in vitro and is required but not sufficient to recruit RNA to P granules. Our findings suggest that P granule assembly depends in part on protein-protein interactions that drive condensation independent of RNA.

scholarly journals Probing DNA interactions with proteins using a single-molecule toolbox: inside the cell, in a test tube and in a computer

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J. M. Wollman ◽  
Helen Miller ◽  
Zhaokun Zhou ◽  
Mark C. Leake
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Super Resolution ◽  
Magnetic Tweezers ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Live Cells ◽  
Molecular Heterogeneity ◽  
Molecular Signatures

DNA-interacting proteins have roles in multiple processes, many operating as molecular machines which undergo dynamic meta-stable transitions to bring about their biological function. To fully understand this molecular heterogeneity, DNA and the proteins that bind to it must ideally be interrogated at a single molecule level in their native in vivo environments, in a time-resolved manner, fast enough to sample the molecular transitions across the free-energy landscape. Progress has been made over the past decade in utilizing cutting-edge tools of the physical sciences to address challenging biological questions concerning the function and modes of action of several different proteins which bind to DNA. These physiologically relevant assays are technically challenging but can be complemented by powerful and often more tractable in vitro experiments which confer advantages of the chemical environment with enhanced detection signal-to-noise of molecular signatures and transition events. In the present paper, we discuss a range of techniques we have developed to monitor DNA–protein interactions in vivo, in vitro and in silico. These include bespoke single-molecule fluorescence microscopy techniques to elucidate the architecture and dynamics of the bacterial replisome and the structural maintenance of bacterial chromosomes, as well as new computational tools to extract single-molecule molecular signatures from live cells to monitor stoichiometry, spatial localization and mobility in living cells. We also discuss recent developments from our laboratory made in vitro, complementing these in vivo studies, which combine optical and magnetic tweezers to manipulate and image single molecules of DNA, with and without bound protein, in a new super-resolution fluorescence microscope.

scholarly journals Nucleosomes accelerate transcription factor dissociation

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 3017-3027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Luo ◽  
Justin A. North ◽  
Sean D. Rose ◽  
Michael G. Poirier
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Dissociation Rate ◽  
Duplex Dna ◽  
Recognition Sequence ◽  
Nucleosome Arrays

AbstractTranscription factors (TF) bind DNA-target sites within promoters to activate gene expression. TFs target their DNA-recognition sequences with high specificity by binding with resident times of up to hours in vitro. However, in vivo TFs can exchange on the order of seconds. The factors that regulate TF dynamics in vivo and increase dissociation rates by orders of magnitude are not known. We investigated TF binding and dissociation dynamics at their recognition sequence within duplex DNA, single nucleosomes and short nucleosome arrays with single molecule total internal reflection fluorescence (smTIRF) microscopy. We find that the rate of TF dissociation from its site within either nucleosomes or nucleosome arrays is increased by 1000-fold relative to duplex DNA. Our results suggest that TF binding within chromatin could be responsible for the dramatic increase in TF exchange in vivo. Furthermore, these studies demonstrate that nucleosomes regulate DNA–protein interactions not only by preventing DNA–protein binding but by dramatically increasing the dissociation rate of protein complexes from their DNA-binding sites.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document