Therapeutic selective neck dissection (level II–V) for node-positive hypopharyngeal carcinoma: is it oncologically safe?

2009 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Chang Lim ◽  
Young Chang Lim ◽  
Jin Seok Lee ◽  
Eun Chang Choi
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Iqbal ◽  
Abu Bakar Hafeez Bhatti ◽  
Raza Hussain ◽  
Arif Jamshed

Aim. To share experience with regional failures after selective neck dissection in both node negative and positive previously untreated patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.Patients and Methods. Data of 219 patients who underwent SND at Shaukat Khanum Cancer Hospital from 2003 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, treatment modalities, and regional failures were assessed. Expected 5-year regional control was calculated and prognostic factors were determined.Results. Median follow-up was 29 (9–109) months. Common sites were anterior tongue in 159 and buccal mucosa in 22 patients. Pathological nodal stage was N0 in 114, N1 in 32, N2b in 67, and N2c in 5 patients. Fourteen (6%) patients failed in clinically node negative neck while 8 (4%) failed in clinically node positive patients. Out of 22 total regional failures, primary tumor origin was from tongue in 16 (73%) patients. Expected 5-year regional control was 95% and 81% for N0 and N+ disease, respectively (P<0.0001). Only 13% patients with well differentiated, T1 tumors in cN0 neck were pathologically node positive.Conclusions. Selective neck dissection yields acceptable results for regional management of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Wait and see policy may be effective in a selected subgroup of patients.


Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunichi Shimura ◽  
Kazuhiro Ogi ◽  
Akihiro Miyazaki ◽  
Shota Shimizu ◽  
Takeshi Kaneko ◽  
...  

The most important prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is neck metastasis, which is treated by neck dissection. Although selective neck dissection (SND) is a useful tool for clinically node-negative OSCC, its efficacy for neck node-positive OSCC has not been established. Sixty-eight OSCC patients with pN1–3 disease who were treated with curative surgery using SND and/or modified-radical/radical neck dissection (MRND/RND) were retrospectively reviewed. The neck control rate was 94% for pN1–3 patients who underwent SND. The five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in pN1-3 OSCC patients were 62% and 71%, respectively. The multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological variables identified the number of positive nodes as an independent predictor of SND outcome (OS, hazard ratio (HR) = 4.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.48–16.72, p < 0.01; DSS, HR = 6.44, 95% CI: 1.76–23.50, p < 0.01). The results of this retrospective study showed that only SND for neck node-positive OSCC was appropriate for those with up to 2 lymph nodes that had a largest diameter ≤3 cm without extranodal extension (ENE) of the neck and adjuvant radiotherapy. However, the availability of postoperative therapeutic options for high-risk OSCC, including ENE and/or multiple positive lymph nodes, needs to be further investigated.


1996 ◽  
Vol 172 (6) ◽  
pp. 654-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean J. Traynor ◽  
James I. Cohen ◽  
Jason Gray ◽  
Peter E. Andersen ◽  
Edwin C. Everts

2004 ◽  
Vol 132 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 73-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeljko Petrovic ◽  
Svetislav Jelic ◽  
Ivica Pendjer

Appropriate management of patients with supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma and negative findings in the neck is still controversial. A prospective and retrospective study comprised 193 patients who were treated primary surgically between 1976 and 1993. They all had clinically and ultrasound negative findings on the neck (NO). Supraglottic carcinomas usually spread regionally. Metastases develop in the jugular group, between level II-IV. The incidence of metastases has been reported to vary from 12 to 62.5%. The size and localization of the primary tumor, its histological grade, genotype of the malignant cells, imunological and other elucidated factors can all affect the incidence of regional spread. AIM Aim of this study was to specify the incidence of occult cervical metastases; to analyze the distribution of occult metastases related to tumor localization; to specify the distribution of occult metastases related to local spread; to analyze the distribution of occult metastases according to localization in the neck. RESULTS All patients had primary surgery of primary tumor and bilateral jugular, selective neck dissection at the level II-IV with histological examination of removed lymphoid tissue. Out of 193 patients, metastatic deposits were detected in 35(18%). Occult metastases were found in patients with carcinoma of the epilarynx in 19% (14/72) of cases, and in 17% (21/121) patients with carcinoma of the supraglottis excluding the epilarynx. This difference in frequency is not statistically significant. The incidence of occult metastases in epilaryngeal tumors did not depend on the degree of local spread. Even relatively small tumors (T1 and T2) yielded occult metastases in 33% (5/15), and 24% (6/25) of patients, respectively. In patients with T1 tumors localized at the supraglottis, excluding the epilarinx, occult metastases were not found. In the supragiottis excluding the epilarynx increased local spread was associated an increase of occult metastases. The incidence of occult metastases was directly related to the degree of the local spread of the tumor in the supraglottis excluding the epilarynx (Table 1). Occult metastases were usually ipsilateral, like the palpable ones. In medially localized tumors bilateral netastases were possible. Ipsilateral metastases were more frequent than both bilateral and contralateral ones. The possibility of contraiateral and bilateral occult metastases necessitated bilateral neck dissection. Postoperative radiotherapy (60 Gy) was given to all patients with verified occult metastases. Only in two patients (1%) of the total did metastases develop subsequently, indicating the effectiveness of planned postoperatrive radiotherapy. DISCUSSION Controversies in application of jugular, selective neck dissection are presently since it has been in use, because of the unclear role wich regional lymph tissue play in antitumor immune response. Jugular, selective neck dissection was advocated in all patients with a primary supraglottic laryngeal carcinomas. It was suggested that selective neck dissection was needed only in advanced (T3 and T4) tumors. Selective dissection is believed to be needed only when tumor has spread into the vallecula, the base of the tongue, or the medial wall of the piriform sinus. The idea of selective neck dissection has been opposed since the protective role of the cervical lymph tissue has been stressed. Ultrasound and computerized tomography of the neck cannot detect occult metastases. Today, only removal and histological examination of the lymph tissue can determine occult metastasis. The importance of selective neck dissection is considered in diagnostic biopsy procedure by wich occult metastatic spread in the neck region is established. CONCLUSION Due to the tendency of supraglottic carcinoma resulting in occult cervical metastases, early detection is imperative in order to apply the appropriate therapy. Occult cervical metastases are usually ipsilateral, but bilateral and contralateral may be found as well. Due to the aforementioned, it is necessary to perform bilateral jugular, selective cervical dissection of the neck level II-IV with histological evidence of removed lymph tissue. When metastases is verified histologically, postoperative radiotherapy is indicated as being efficent in hampering the development of palpable metastases. Five-year survival with no evidence disease is 86% (166/193).


Oral Oncology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S36-S37
Author(s):  
Y.-S. Shin ◽  
W.-S. Kim ◽  
S.-H. Kim ◽  
Y.-W. Koh ◽  
H.-S. Lee ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 128 (10) ◽  
pp. 1180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Andersen ◽  
Frank Warren ◽  
Jeffrey Spiro ◽  
Alan Burningham ◽  
Richard Wong ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document