Building on Successes: Reflections from Two Approaches to Study Abroad for Undergraduate and Graduate Students

2013 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Linder ◽  
Julie McGaha
2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Halawani Montes ◽  
Mike Karakashian ◽  
Chrisann Schiro-Geist ◽  
Emer Broadbent ◽  
Jennifer A. Drabowicz

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara Yakaboski ◽  
Karla Perez-Velez ◽  
Yousef Almutairi

The authors in this qualitative study explored how Saudi Arabian students Saudi Arabiaselected a teaching focused research institution by examining Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and U.S. national influences, institutional factors, and personal influencers. Despite the continued rise in Saudi Arabian students studying at U.S. universities, limited published research exists on this unique student population. This study on Saudi graduate students reconceptualizes the homogenous perspectives on international student mobility. It demonstrates that study abroad decisions are not made from just push-pull or economic factors but through culturally specific social processes involving various actors both in and beyond their home country as well as intermediaries that is indicative of a more collectivist society.


2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-248
Author(s):  
Kathy Obenchain ◽  
Stephanie Oudghiri ◽  
JoAnn Phillion

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1075-1084
Author(s):  
Mershen Pillay ◽  
Ishara Ramkissoon

Purpose Many health professions engage service learning via international humanitarian health care or study abroad programs toward an improved sense of civic responsibility, an aspect that has been inadequately analyzed in hearing health care. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how the curriculum of an international humanitarian health care program in South Africa influenced U.S. graduate students' civic responsibility and their educators' perspectives on audiology study abroad service learning programs. Method Participants ( n = 14) in this study abroad program included seven female graduate audiology students, five community partners, and two educators. Quantitative data were derived from pre- and postprogram administration of the Public Affairs Scale (Levesque-Bristol & Cornelius-White, 2012). Qualitative data sources included student journals, student exit interview, educator field notes and discussions, and responses to the community partner evaluation survey completed by host site personnel. Results A comparison of pre- and postprogram Public Affairs Scale ratings revealed that students demonstrated a significant increase in community engagement, cultural competence, and ethical leadership. Qualitative data revealed themes referenced to practitioners, clients, and context. Further thematic analysis identified three key results including foregrounding health as a development of people, educators and students as critically oriented public intellectuals, and global dialogue for pedagogic (audiology) justice. Discussion and Conclusion Carefully designed study abroad curricular contributed to audiology graduate students' increased service learning, civic responsibility, and civic engagement. Quantitative and qualitative analyses revealed that student service learning experiences were mediated by resources and people in the local context. This study abroad curriculum facilitated educators' thinking regarding the placement of audiology health services and audiology educational models in a globalized world. Health professional pedagogic considerations should be designed for humanitarian health care so that service learning focuses the production of critically oriented practitioners who are competent at enacting practices in global service learning programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document