scholarly journals Mechanical loading of the low back and shoulders during pushing and pulling activities

Ergonomics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco JM Hoozemans ◽  
P Paul FM Kuijer ◽  
Idsart Kingma ◽  
Jaap H van Dieën ◽  
Wiebe HK de Vries ◽  
...  
Ergonomics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 853-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric B. Weston ◽  
Alexander Aurand ◽  
Jonathan S. Dufour ◽  
Gregory G. Knapik ◽  
William S. Marras

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (19) ◽  
pp. 6646
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Toner ◽  
Jeremy Rickards ◽  
Kenneth Seaman ◽  
Usha Kuruganti

Previous research identifies that pushing and pulling is responsible for approximately 9–18% of all low back injuries. Additionally, the handle design of a cart being pushed can dramatically alter a worker’s capacity to push (≅9.5%). Surprisingly little research has examined muscle activation of the low back and its role in muscle function. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of handle design combination of pushing a platform truck cart on trunk muscle activity. Twenty participants (10 males and 10 females, mean age = 24.3 ± 4.3 years) pushed 475 lbs using six different handle combinations involving handle orientation (vertical/horizontal/semi-pronated) and handle height (hip/shoulder). Multichannel high-density EMG (HDsEMG) was recorded for left and right rectus abdominis, erector spinae, and external obliques. Pushing at hip height with a horizontal handle orientation design (HH) resulted in significantly less (p < 0.05) muscle activity compared to the majority of other handle designs, as well as a significantly higher entropy than the shoulder handle height involving either the semi-pronated (p = 0.023) or vertical handle orientation (p = 0.028). The current research suggests that the combination of a hip height and horizontal orientation handle design may require increased muscle demand of the trunk and alter the overall muscle heterogeneity and pattern of the muscle activity.


2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric W. P. Bakker ◽  
Arianne P. Verhagen ◽  
Cees Lucas ◽  
Hans J. C. M. F. Koning ◽  
Rob J. de Haan ◽  
...  

Ergonomics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
P Paul Kuijer ◽  
Marco Hoozemans ◽  
Idsart Kingma ◽  
Jaap Van Dieën ◽  
Wiebe De Vries ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Resuscitation ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 1181-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jui-Yi Tsou ◽  
Chih-Hsien Chi ◽  
Rebekah Min-Fang Hsu ◽  
Hui-Fen Wu ◽  
Fong-Chin Su

Author(s):  
Bjarne Laursen ◽  
Bente Schibye

Substituting lifting with pushing and pulling generally reduces the disc compression in the low back. However, from a biomechanical point of view, pushing and pulling tasks are much more complex to analyse compared to lifting. Instead of being close to vertical, the force directions are virtually unknown, and may vary during different phases of the task. The relation between external force and internal load is not simple, as force direction and body posture may change accordingly. Further, focus has mainly been on the lumbar spine and not on shoulder load. Although the lumbar spine load is reduced, shoulder muscle load is not necessarily changed to the same extent during pushing and pulling compared to lifting. Therefore, shoulder load is brought into focus in a study of pushing and pulling. Seven male waste collectors pushed and pulled two-wheeled containers with up to 50 kg of waste. When performing one-handed pull behind the body, the force was up to 280 N, and the internal shoulder flexion moments were up to 80 Nm in the initial phase, close to the subject's maximum shoulder flexion moments. For the two-handed push in front of the body, the total force was up to 360 N, corresponding to approximately 180 N for each hand. Pushing caused lower shoulder moments, up to 34 Nm in the initial phase. During steady state, the total force was up to 230 N when pushing and 130 N when pulling. Shoulder moments were below 27 Nm when pulling and below 16 Nm when pushing (all results are given as mean of subjects). Regarding the relation between exposure and internal load, there was a positive relation between the magnitude of the hand force and the shoulder moment (r=0.48). For the compression in the lumbar spine there was no relation to the magnitude of the hand force (r=0.05). In conclusion, although loads on the low back during pushing and pulling are relatively small, loads on the shoulder muscles may be very high in some cases. Pushing and pulling may therefore be a risk factor for shoulder disorders.


Ergonomics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 543-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Paul F. M. Kuijer ◽  
Marco J. M. Hoozemans ◽  
Idsart Kingma ◽  
Jaap H. Van Dieën ◽  
Wiebe H. K. De Vries ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document