SPORE-POLLEN COMPLEXES OF UPPER DEVONIAN OF THE RUSSIAN PLATFORM

1960 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 688-704
Author(s):  
S. N. Naumova
Author(s):  
Петр Фролов ◽  
Оксана Мясникова ◽  
Александр Савицкий

The possible use of carbonate rocks from some Karelian deposits for the production of correcting additives to raw cement blend from cement occurrences in the Leningrad and Novgorod districts (exemplified by the Babino occurrence) with insufficient standards for unaided exploitation are discussed.


1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne W. Brideaux ◽  
Norman W. Radforth

Miospores of early Frasnian age are described from the third unit of the Escuminac Formation in eastern Québec, Canada. The assemblage comprises 34 species, including 8 species proposed as new, 2 new combinations, and 12 sparsely represented forms not considered synonymous with previously described species.The assemblage is most closely comparable to a Middle Devonian assemblage from the Orcadian Basin, Scotland. Similarities are also noted with European and Russian assemblages, particularly from the Eifelian–Givetian of the Russian Platform. Except for five long-ranging species, elements of Lower Carboniferous assemblages are lacking. Evidence suggests a transitional nature for this Escuminac assemblage. Miospores of relatively large size, a feature of Middle Devonian assemblages, are present. Marked differentiation of large and small spore types, found in several other Upper Devonian assem blages is absent. Apiculate and anchor-spined species dominate the Escuminac assemblage.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
David Clark ◽  
Drew Derenthal ◽  
Bart Kowallis ◽  
Scott Ritter

In central Utah, the major pre-Mississippian unconformity is fairly well understood at most of the localities where it is recognized. However, the unconformity is more enigmatic in Rock Canyon of the central Wasatch Range. At this locality, dolomitization of most pre-Mississippian rocks obscures stratigraphic identification of Devonian and older units. The absence of any identifiable angular relationship further complicates resolution. Because of this, both identification of the stratigraphic level of the unconformity and, consequently, its magnitude remain controversial. Large-size dolomite samples taken in Rock Canyon at closely spaced intervals for the 3.6-m directly below definite Upper Devonian rocks yield microfossils, including conodonts, in the uppermost 1.6-m of that interval that indicate no unconformity exists between the Cambrian Maxfield Limestone and the Upper Devonian-Lower Mississippian Fitchville Dolomite at the horizon previously identified as unconformable. Rather, an unknown thickness of dolomitized Upper Devonian Pinyon Peak Formation and probable older rock (possibly Bluebell Dolomite and Victoria Formation) occurs between the top of definite Maxfield and base of the Fitchville. The identification of the unconformity horizon remains unknown. Our preliminary work outlines a promising procedure for future understanding of the magnitude and stratigraphic level of the unconformity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document