Evolutionary feature selection applied to artificial neural networks for wood-veneer classification

2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 3085-3105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Castellani ◽  
Hefin Rowlands
Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucijano Berus ◽  
Simon Klancnik ◽  
Miran Brezocnik ◽  
Mirko Ficko

In recent years, neural networks have become very popular in all kinds of prediction problems. In this paper, multiple feed-forward artificial neural networks (ANNs) with various configurations are used in the prediction of Parkinson’s disease (PD) of tested individuals, based on extracted features from 26 different voice samples per individual. Results are validated via the leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) scheme. Few feature selection procedures based on Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Kendall’s correlation coefficient, principal component analysis, and self-organizing maps, have been used for boosting the performance of algorithms and for data reduction. The best test accuracy result has been achieved with Kendall’s correlation coefficient-based feature selection, and the most relevant voice samples are recognized. Multiple ANNs have proven to be the best classification technique for diagnosis of PD without usage of the feature selection procedure (on raw data). Finally, a neural network is fine-tuned, and a test accuracy of 86.47% was achieved.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-322
Author(s):  
Petrina Papazek ◽  
Irene Schicker ◽  
Claudia Plant ◽  
Alexander Kann ◽  
Yong Wang

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1581
Author(s):  
Sebastian Marschner ◽  
Elia Lombardo ◽  
Lena Minibek ◽  
Adrien Holzgreve ◽  
Lena Kaiser ◽  
...  

This study retrospectively analyzed the performance of artificial neural networks (ANN) to predict overall survival (OS) or locoregional failure (LRF) in HNSCC patients undergoing radiotherapy, based on 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT and clinical covariates. We compared predictions relying on three different sets of features, extracted from 230 patients. Specifically, (i) an automated feature selection method independent of expert rating was compared with (ii) clinical variables with proven influence on OS or LRF and (iii) clinical data plus expert-selected SUV metrics. The three sets were given as input to an artificial neural network for outcome prediction, evaluated by Harrell’s concordance index (HCI) and by testing stratification capability. For OS and LRF, the best performance was achieved with expert-based PET-features (0.71 HCI) and clinical variables (0.70 HCI), respectively. For OS stratification, all three feature sets were significant, whereas for LRF only expert-based PET-features successfully classified low vs. high-risk patients. Based on 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT features, stratification into risk groups using ANN for OS and LRF is possible. Differences in the results for different feature sets confirm the relevance of feature selection, and the key importance of expert knowledge vs. automated selection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document