Fever of unknown origin in the elderly

1992 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 197-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Berland ◽  
Richard A. Gleckman
1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 501-513
Author(s):  
Kenneth M. Wakefield ◽  
Scott T. Henderson ◽  
Jerry G. Streit

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 221-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minghua Zheng ◽  
Hailong Lin ◽  
Sheng Luo ◽  
Lihua Xu ◽  
Yanjun Zeng ◽  
...  

This is a retrospective study of older patients admitted to the First and Second Affiliated Hospitals of Wenzhou Medical College, China, with a diagnosis of fever of unknown origin. The study took place from January 1998 to December 2006 among 102 patients who fulfilled the criteria. Infections were responsible for 50 cases (49.1%), followed by no diagnosis in 27 (26.5%), miscellaneous in nine (8.8%), neoplasms in eight (7.8%) and connective tissue disease in another eight (7.8%). Mycobacterium TB was the most frequent type of infection diagnosed.


1978 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 498-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANTHONY L. ESPOSITO ◽  
RICHARD A. GLECKMAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biljana Popovska-Jovicic ◽  
Predrag Canovic ◽  
Olgica Gajovic ◽  
Ivana Rakovic ◽  
Zeljko Mijailovic

Background/Aim. The differential diagnosis of fever of unknown origin (FUO) includes more than 200 different diseases and conditions. The aim of this study was to identify the most frequent causes of FUO among adult patients according to gender and age. Methods. The study included 74 patients examined from June 2010 to June 2013 at the Infectious Disease Clinic, Clinical Center Kragujevac in Serbia, according to the defined criteria for FUO. The patients were divided according to the diagnosis into four groups: infectious, malignant, rheumatic and "other diseases". A cause of febricity could not be estabilshed in a portion of subjects, and they comprised the group of undiagnosed cases. Results. Infectious diseases were dominant in the study, followed by rheumatic diseases, which were most frequently found in women and the elderly. The diseases recognised as the most common causes of febricity were subacute thyroiditis, subacute endocarditis, Still?s disease, rheumatic polymyalgia with or without temporal arteritis, and cytomegalovirus infection. In 44% of the patients, the final diagnosis was composed of only six clinical entities. Conclusion. The importance of establishing the diagnosis of rheumatic disease is especially emphasised, in line with other authors? research indicating the number of these diseases is on the rise. The diagnostic approach to FUO should always be directed to the known frequency of diseases.


2006 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 399-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
İbrahim Koral Önal ◽  
Mustafa Cankurtaran ◽  
Mustafa Çakar ◽  
Meltem Halil ◽  
Zekeriya Ülger ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S8-S9
Author(s):  
Paula Augusto ◽  
Mónica Levy ◽  
Samaher Tannira ◽  
Francisco Silva ◽  
José Graça

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 64-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vesna Turkulov ◽  
Snezana Brkic ◽  
Sinisa Sevic ◽  
Daniela Maric ◽  
Slavica Tomic

Introduction. Causes of fever of unknown origin are different. It is considered that it can be caused with over 200 different clinical entities. Aetiological causes differ according to different categories of age. Febricity in the elderly is at most the result of autoimmune processes, malignancies, bacterial infections and vasculitis. Objective. The aim of this study was to determine the most common characteristics of fever, the most common laboratory, bacterial and viral tests and to analyze applied therapy in patients with unknown febrile state, and to affirm final diagnosis in elderly patients, as well as younger than 65 years old, and to define outcome of disease in both groups of patients. Methods. Research comprised 100 patients who had been treated at the Infectious Disease Clinic of the Clinical Centre of Vojvodina in Novi Sad, during a three-year period, and in whom fever of unknown origin had been diagnosed. Patients were divided into two homogenous groups of 50 people. The first one (S) consisted of patients older than 65 years, and the second, control group (K) was constituted of patients younger than the age of 65. All of them were chosen by random sample method. Results. Average results of standard laboratory parameters of infection were obtained, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fibrinogen, CRP, and especially leukocyte, and those were significantly higher in the group of elderly patients. The cause had not been found in 10% of elderly patient group, and in the younger group, not even in the third of patients. Among known causative agents dominant were infections, usually of respiratory and urinary tract, in both tested groups. Even 28% of the elderly had sepsis, and 10% endocarditis. Malignant diseases were more frequent in group of the elderly patients, and immune i.e. systematic disorders were evenly noticed in both groups of patients. Conclusion. Despite advanced studies in medicine, and existence of modern diagnostic procedures, fever of unknown origin is still today differential diagnostic problem.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document