Life Cycle and Housing Adjustment as Explanations of Residential Mobility

Urban Studies ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.A.V. Clark ◽  
Jun Onaka
1980 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1103-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare M Stapleton

The conventional concept of linear progression through a traditional life cycle underlies much of social science theory. The utility of retaining the traditional life-cycle framework has declined rapidly as patterns of family and nonfamily structure and behavior have become more diversified. A more comprehensive framework which encompasses these new household types is suggested. The utility of this expanded life-cycle model is explored, with particular reference to single-headed family households and primary households.


2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Davies ◽  
Andrew R. Pickles

1977 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Yee ◽  
M. D. Van Arsdol

1977 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-30
Author(s):  

AbstractMany factors account for why families or households move from one residence to another in an urban area and it is an enormous and difficult task to attempt to isolate or rank the factors in ordered importance. This is because many of them do not operate singly but often in company with others. Nevertheless, studies in Western cities by Rossi (1955),' Maisel (1966),' and Simmons (1968),' for examples, have shown that one important group of variables that consistently affect intra- urban residential mobility is that associated with the family life cycle. In fact, Simmons (1968) concluded that over half of intra-urban mobility within a moderately growing city in the United States "results from the changing housing needs generated by the life cycle."


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamizah Abdul Fattah ◽  
Nurwati Badarulzaman ◽  
Kausar Ali

Most people have experienced a crucial moment of decision during their life course, that of whether to stay over or to move out of their house and neighbourhood. Residential mobility refers to mobility thoughts and intentions, as well as the actual moving behaviours among the residents, which are often triggered by feelings of dissatisfactions, state of disequilibrium or mismatch between the present housing needs and consumption, and the desired housing preferences. Residential mobility is postulated to be influenced by many factors, notably family life cycle (infant to elderly phase), tenure ownership (house owner or renter), housing profile (dwelling features) and quality of the neighbourhood. There is limited study on tenure ownership and factors of neighbourhood quality that can affect mobility decision and residential mobility behaviour. Hence, this study examines mobility decisions based on tenure ownership and neighbourhood quality including physical, social and economic attributes among residents of housing schemes in Penang Island, Malaysia. A questionnaire survey of 717 respondents living in low, medium and high cost housing in the study area revealed that dwelling features, neighbourhood facilities, environment, social interaction and attachment are the major considerations and preferences affecting residential mobility behaviours among residents. The study findings provide insights and guidance on planning for better neighbourhoods to satisfy residents’ needs and enhance quality of life.


Urban Studies ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.A.V. Clark ◽  
Jun L. Onaka

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document