Internet Pornography Use: Perceived Addiction, Psychological Distress, and the Validation of a Brief Measure

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua B. Grubbs ◽  
Fred Volk ◽  
Julie J. Exline ◽  
Kenneth I. Pargament
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Grubbs ◽  
Joshua Wilt ◽  
Julie J. Exline ◽  
Kenneth Pargament

In recent years, several works have reported on perceived addiction to internet pornography, or the potential for some individuals to label their own use of pornography as compulsive or out of control. Such works have consistently found that perceived addiction is related to concerning outcomes such as psychological distress, relational distress, and other addictive behaviors. However, very little work has specifically examined whether or not perceived addiction is actually related to increased use of pornography, cross-sectionally or over time. The present work sought to address this deficit in the literature. Using two longitudinal samples (Sample 1, Baseline N = 3,988; Sample 2, Baseline N = 1,047), a variety of factors (e.g., male gender, lower religiousness, and lower self-control) were found to predict any use of pornography. Among those that acknowledged use (Sample 1, Baseline N = 1,352; Sample 2, Baseline N = 793), perceived addiction to pornography consistently predicted greater average daily use of pornography. At subsequent longitudinal follow-ups (Sample 1, Baseline N = 265; Sample 2, One Month Later, N = 410, One Year Later, N = 360), only male gender and baseline average pornography use consistently predicted future use. These findings suggest that perceived addiction to pornography is associated with concurrent use of pornography, but does not appear to predict use over time, suggesting that perceived addiction may not always be an accurate indicator of behavior or addiction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-74
Author(s):  
Hannah Edlund

AbstractDrawing on and expanding previous graduate course research, this paper investigated and analyzed public libraries’ policies regarding patron use of legal, visual Internet pornography on public computers. Pornographic imagery that falls within legal boundaries is protected by the First Amendment. Incidents of, and library responses to, pornography viewing are not a new issue and have caused turmoil across the field of library and information science. In an attempt to understand the problem, the research question asks: how do public libraries respond to patrons viewing legal Internet pornography, while upholding First Amendment rights as well as the Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) and other legal requirements? Libraries tread a fine line to protect First Amendment rights, respect community laws, and uphold CIPA. Research indicated that responding to Internet pornography use in public libraries is heavily dependent on individual, community and library values. Policies are more likely to prohibit patrons from accessing Internet pornography, and most libraries have at least some Internet filtering software restricting what content may be accessed on public use computers. However, evidence also suggests that regardless of policy or filters, library staff will at some point encounter a patron accessing Internet pornography.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 574-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaro Pekal ◽  
Christian Laier ◽  
Jan Snagowski ◽  
Rudolf Stark ◽  
Matthias Brand

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua B. Grubbs ◽  
Paul J. Wright ◽  
Abby L. Braden ◽  
Joshua A. Wilt ◽  
Shane W. Kraus

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. S24-S25
Author(s):  
Alyssa Tao ◽  
Arnaldo Moreno ◽  
Stefana Morgan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document