<p>A plausible simulation of the global energy balance is a first-order requirement for a credible climate model. In the present study I investigate the representation of the global energy balance in 40 state-of-the-art global climate models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6). In the CMIP6 multi-model mean, the magnitudes of the energy balance components are often in better agreement with recent reference estimates compared to earlier model generations &#160;such as CMIP5 on a global mean basis. However, the inter-model spread in the representation of many of the components remains substantial, often on the order of 10-20 Wm<sup>-2</sup> globally, &#160;except for aspects of the shortwave clear-sky budgets, which are now more consistently simulated by the CMIP6 models. The substantial inter-model spread in the simulated global mean latent heat fluxes in the CMIP6 models, exceeding 20% (18 Wm<sup>-2</sup>), &#160;further implies also large discrepancies in their representation of the global water balance. From a historic perspective of model development over the past decades, the largest adjustments in the magnitudes of the simulated present-day global mean energy balance components occurred in the shortwave atmospheric clear-sky absorption and the surface downward longwave radiation. Both components were gradually adjusted upwards over several model generations, on the order of 10 Wm<sup>-2</sup>, to reach 73 and 344 Wm<sup>-2</sup>, respectively in the CMIP6 multi-model means. Thereby, CMIP6 has become the first model generation that largely remediates long-standing model deficiencies related to an overestimation in surface downward shortwave and compensational underestimation in downward longwave radiation in its multi-model mean (Wild 2020).</p><p>Published in: Wild, M., 2020: The global energy balance as represented in CMIP6 climate models. Clim Dyn <strong>55, </strong>553&#8211;577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05282-7</p><p>&#160;</p>