Why and How to Use Customer Opinions: A Quality-of-Life and Customer Satisfaction-Oriented Foundation for Performance-Based Decision-Making

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Montague Fischer ◽  
Mshadoni Smith ◽  
Adjo Amekudzi Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Customer Satisfaction

scholarly journals Parental Conflict, Regret, and Short-term Impact on Quality of Life in Tracheostomy Decision-Making

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessie W. October ◽  
Amy H. Jones ◽  
Hannah Greenlick Michals ◽  
Lauren M. Hebert ◽  
Jiji Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Parental Conflict ◽  
Short Term

Abstract 17: An Evaluation of Patient Disposition and Long-term Health-related Quality of Life In MISTIE III: Opportunities to Improve Decision Making for Critically Ill Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lourdes Carhuapoma ◽  
Radhika Avadhani ◽  
Noeleen Ostapkovich ◽  
Karen Lane ◽  
Nichol McBee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Patient Disposition ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Eq Vas

Introduction: Recovery in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is prolonged and unpredictable, resulting in challenges in estimating health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We describe HRQoL and patient disposition for ICH survivors with similar clinical characteristics to ICH patients who had withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WoLST). Methods: Using MISTIE III trial data (N = 499), we performed a matched cohort analysis using a published modified severity index (mSI) to compare ICH survivors (N = 379) with WoLST patients (N = 61). We used multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, Glasgow Coma Score, deep ICH location, stability ICH and intraventricular hemorrhage volume and ≥ 3 comorbidities to create the mSI. After matching survivors with equal mSI to WoLST patients, we compared EuroQoL (EQ) visual analog scale (VAS) scores (US norm 69-76; range 0-100) by mSI quartile and patient disposition. Results: We matched 224 survivors to WoLST patients by mSI (range 0-6.5), with data at all timepoints. Given the large mSI range, EQ VAS scores and patient disposition were evaluated by mSI quartile groups. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) EQ VAS score increase for all mSI groups from day 30 (D30) to 180 (D180) was 20 (0-35.5, p < 0.0001), and 23.5 (5-40, p < 0.0001) for D30 to 365 (D365). The highest percentage of survivors for all mSI groups were home by D365 (G1 55%, G2 88%, G3 84.5%, G4 90%). Median (IQR) EQ VAS scores by mSI quartile, patient disposition and timepoint are reported below. Conclusion: ICH survivors, matching WoLST individuals, in all mSI groups demonstrated improvement in HRQoL over time, and the majority were home by D365. This study challenges current practice of identifying poor outcomes in concert with decision making employing WoLST in ICH. If goals of care are to include return to home and HRQoL, these results strongly suggest that prognostication can be improved. Prospective studies of ICH prognostication and decision making are needed.

Improving the Perception of Patient-Centered Wellness in a Virtual Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. JDNP-D-20-00078
Author(s):  
Sybilla Myers ◽  
Christopher Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Cognitive Theory ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
The Social

BackgroundPerceived health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is fundamental to well-being and is a meaningful way to measure physical and mental health.Local ProblemNo standard method exists for measuring perceived HRQOL during the COVID-19 pandemic in participants as they attempt to improve their self-determined wellness goals. An implementation plan that considers the social distancing limitations imposed can be used to predict an individual’s likelihood of long-term success.MethodsDuring the four, 2-week plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles, the Social Cognitive Theory model informed the implementation of the four core interventions. To guide iterative changes, the data was analyzed through Excel and run charts.InterventionsThe four core interventions were the shared decision-making tool (SDMT), health mobile app tool (HMAT), wellness tracker tool (WTT), and the team engagement plan.ResultsAmong 28 participants, perceived quality of life increased by 70%, engagement in shared decision-making increased to 82%, app use and confidence increased to 85%, and goal attainment reached 81%.ConclusionsThe SDMT, health app, and wellness tracker created a methodical plan of accountability for increasing participant wellness. The contextual barrier of the COVID-19 pandemic added a negative wellness burden which was mitigated by creating a patient-centered culture of wellness.

scholarly journals Decision Regret and Quality of Life after Focal Therapy with Vascular-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy (TOOKAD®) for Localized Prostate Cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Luka Flegar ◽  
Martin Baunacke ◽  
Bjoern Thorben Buerk ◽  
Rick Proschmann ◽  
Aristeidis Zacharis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Decision Regret ◽  
Targeted Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Decisional Regret

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> The aim of the study was to assess quality of life (QoL), decision involvement, and decisional regret after treatment with vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) (TOOKAD®) for unilateral low-risk prostate cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25) capturing QoL post-treatment, involvement in decision-making (Control Preferences Scale) and decision regret (Decisional Regret Scale), were given to patients at the 12-month visit after undergoing VTP at our institution between May 2018 and February 2021. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Out of 44 patients, 36 patients were included in this study and 31 (86.1%) responded to the questionnaires. Mean overall health score capturing QoL at 12 months was 79.3 (standard deviation: ±18.1). 70.9% of the patients (<i>n</i> = 22) had no decision regret, and 67.8% of men (<i>n</i> = 21) had an active role in decision-making. In control biopsy at 12 months post-treatment, 19.4% of patients (<i>n</i> = 7) presented with local recurrence and progression to higher Gleason score (GS) was found in 13.8% of patients (<i>n</i> = 5). Patients (<i>n</i> = 3) presenting with tumor recurrence or progression to higher GS in control biopsy showed a significantly higher level of decision regret (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.009). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Only 9.7% of men (<i>n</i> = 3) felt a strong emotion of regret at 12 months after VTP. Level of decision regret was significantly higher in patients with local recurrence or tumor progression detected in control biopsy. QoL was stable after VTP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document