The Sobering Effects of Jailhouse Informant Testimony on Perceptions of an Intoxicated Rape Victim

Author(s):  
Alexis M. Le Grand ◽  
Baylee D. Jenkins ◽  
Jonathan M. Golding ◽  
Jeffrey S. Neuschatz ◽  
Andrea M. Pals ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jericho Mariette Hockett ◽  
Sara J. Smith ◽  
Cathleen D. Klausing ◽  
Donald A. Saucier

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maricela B. Aceves ◽  
Maribel Garcia ◽  
Jennifer C. Chang ◽  
Gina M. Hawes ◽  
Diana Tran ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 342-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
PATRICIA A. CLUSS ◽  
JANICE BOUGHTON ◽  
ELLEN FRANK ◽  
BARBARA DUFFY STEWART ◽  
DEBORAH WEST
Keyword(s):  

1980 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-46
Author(s):  
A.F. Wilcox
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Smyth

This paper considers the ways in which discourses of abortion and discourses of national identity were constructed and reproduced through the events of the X case in the Republic of Ireland in 1992. This case involved a state injunction against a 14-year-old rape victim and her parents, to prevent them from obtaining an abortion in Britain. By examining the controversy the case gave rise to in the national press, I will argue that the terms of abortion politics in Ireland shifted from arguments based on rights to arguments centred on national identity, through the questions the X case raised about women's citizenship status, and women's position in relation to the nation and the state. Discourses of national identity and discourses of abortion shifted away from entrenched traditional positions, towards more liberal articulations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-240
Author(s):  
Elda Maisy Rahmi ◽  
Ali Abu Bakar ◽  
Suhaimi Suhaimi

Penelitian ini ingin menjawab faktor apa saja yang meleatarbelakangi tidak terlaksananya ‘uqubat restitusi, serta upaya yang dapat dilakukan untuk memperoleh hak restitusi terhadap korban perkosaan. Selama tahun 2018, wilayah hukum Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho yang menanggani kasus perkosaan tidak pernah menerapkan uqubat restitusi terhadap pelaku perkosaan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris, lokasi penelitian di wilayah hukum Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Qanun Jinayat telah menjamin pemberian hak kepada korban perkosaan. Hak restitusi terhadap korban perkosaan belum terlaksana disebabkan upaya dari korban sendiri tidak membuat laporan, pengaduan, dan pengakuan untuk ditinjaklanjuti oleh penegak hukum. Pada dasarnya upaya yang dapat dilakukan untuk mendapatkan restitusi bagi korban tindak pidana perkosaan adalah adanya pengakuan dari korban, yang menderita dan juga adanya dukungan dari pihak keluarga atau masyarakat yang partisipasi terhadap korban sehingga mengajukan permohonan kepada yang berwajib untuk menjalani proses selanjutnya dengan tujuan agar terpenuhi hak korban. The Implementation of ‘Uqubat Restitution to Rape Victim This research wants to answer what factors are the underlying that have not been implemented the ‘uqubat restitution’, and the efforts to obtain restitution rights for rape victims. During 2018, the Jantho jurisdiction of the Syar'iyah Court never applied the restitutionary sentence to rape perpetrators. This study uses an empirical juridical approach, the location of the study is in the Jantho Jurisdiction of the Syar'iyah Court. The results showed that Qanun Jinayat had guaranteed granting rights to rape victims. The right to restitution of rape victims has not been realized due to the efforts of the victims themselves not to make reports, complaints, and confessions to be followed up by law enforcement. Basically, efforts that can be made to obtain restitution for victims are recognition of the victim and also support from the family or community so that the victim submits an application to the authorities to undergo legal proceedings in order to fulfill the victims' rights.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Orin Gusta Andini

The purpose of this research is to know the vague of crime perpetrator identity by journalist from law number 40/1990 on Pers and Penal Code Perspective and to know the rule of police in enforcing the law related to vague of crime perpetrator identity in observuing journalist investigation result. The type of this research field is filed research in which data collection done by interviewing several parties related to research. Besides, writer also make literature research through related data and books. Then, data taken is analysed qualitatively and explained descriptively.Based on analysis, writer conclude that: very side interpretation on rejection right is legal weakness that can be used by journalist to do action which vague identity if crime perpetrator. The action of vague crime perpetrator identity fey on Artivle 165 Indonesia Penal Code which oblige every citizen to report known to police officer. The usage of rejection right by journalist not suit to article 165 Indonesia Penal Code that can be used to vague informan identity who is witness, child crime perpetrator and rape victim as journalist ethic code. Keywords: The Vague of Perpetrator Identity, Journalist, Law Number 40/1999 on Pers, Indonesian Penal Code.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document