Occurrence of putatively resistant plantago in the winter rainfall region of South Africa: a survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 411-415
Author(s):  
Vhuthu Ndou ◽  
Ethel E Phiri ◽  
Frederik H Eksteen ◽  
Petrus J Pieterse
2002 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 335-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilhelm Botha ◽  
Jacomina Bloem ◽  
Ian Law

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon L. Magoswana ◽  
James S. Boatwright ◽  
Anthony R. Magee ◽  
John C. Manning

Othonna L. (Asteraceae: Senecioneae: Othonninae) is a genus of some 120 species concentrated in the Greater Cape Floristic Region (GCFR) of South Africa, with a few species extending into southern Namibia, Angola, and Zimbabwe. The South African species of Othonna were last revised more than a century ago, and many species, particularly from the southern African winter rainfall region, remain poorly understood. This study focused on the geophytic species comprising the O. bulbosa group, distinguished by their tuberous rootstock and annual, leafy, aerial stems. A comprehensive taxonomic treatment is presented, including descriptions, complete nomenclature and typification, illustrations, and geographical distribution. Twenty-five species are recognized, of which four are newly described (O. lilacina Magoswana & J. C. Manning, O. nigromontana Magoswana & J. C. Manning, O. revoluta Magoswana & J. C. Manning, and O. sinuata Magoswana & J. C. Manning), and 18 names are reduced to synonymy. The species differ in habit, shape and incision of foliage, capitulum type (radiate vs. disciform), number of involucral bracts, pappus length, and cypselae (myxogenic vs. nonmyxogenic). We place the species into four morphologically diagnosable series (series Heterophyllae Magoswana & J. C. Manning, series Disciformes Magoswana & J. C. Manning, series Perfoliatae Magoswana & J. C. Manning, and series Undulosae Magoswana & J. C. Manning) based on habit and capitulum type.


2011 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Christina Lamprecht ◽  
Yared Tesfai Tewoldemedhin ◽  
Mark Hardy ◽  
Frikkie J. Calitz ◽  
Mark Mazzola

Bothalia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Young ◽  
Philip G. Desmet

Background: The dwarf succulent genus Conophytum N.E.Br. is one of the most species rich in the Aizoceae. The genus is most closely associated with a region of high floral endemism and biodiversity, the Succulent Karoo biome in south-western Africa.Objectives: To examine the distribution of Conophytum in south-western Namibia and in the Northern and Western Cape Provinces of South Africa.Method: A database comprising 2798 locality records representing all known species and subspecies of the genus Conophytum has been constructed.Results: The genus is primarily restricted to the arid winter-rainfall region of the Northern and Western Cape Provinces of South Africa and south-western Namibia, within the Greater Cape Floristic Region. Whilst taxa are found across all the main biomes in the region (the Succulent Karoo, Nama Karoo, Desert and Fynbos biomes), 94% of Conophytum taxa are found only in the Succulent Karoo biome and predominantly (88% of taxa) within South Africa. Endemism within specific bioregions is a feature of the genus and ~60% of taxa are endemic to the Succulent Karoo. Approximately 28% of all taxa could be considered point endemics. Whilst the genus has a relatively wide geographical range, we identify a pronounced centre of endemism in the southern Richtersveld.Conclusion: The genus Conophytum can be used as a good botanical model for studying patterns of diversity and speciation in the Succulent Karoo biome, the effects of climate change on dwarf succulents, and for informing conservation planning efforts.


Water SA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (2 April) ◽  
Author(s):  
WV Pitman ◽  
AK Bailey

Rainfall is the most important input to any hydrological or water resources study. The decline in the number of suitable rainfall stations since the 1970s is a cause for concern, plus there is an additional complication in that – for a number of catchments – mean annual precipitation (MAP), as derived from a recent study by Pegram, differs substantially from those adopted by the Water Resources of South Africa, 2012 study (WR2012) (mostly as derived by Dent). Rainfall data sourced by the Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS) satellite database was selected as a basis for comparison, both for catchment MAP and time series of monthly rainfall as used for input to the Pitman hydrological model (WRSM/Pitman, previously called WRSM2000). The analyses revealed that the WR2012 method of constructing the time series yielded the best results overall, but the difference was not marked, except in the winter rainfall region, where CHIRPS (and to a lesser extent, Pegram) performed poorly. It is concluded that CHIRPS will have a role to play in future water resources studies. It is recommended that the study be extended to cover a larger sample of catchments with up-to-date rainfall and that the possibility of CHIRPS data being recalibrated for the winter rainfall area be investigated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document