Color doppler ultrasonography of soft-tissue masses

1998 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Lagalla ◽  
A. Iovane ◽  
G. Caruso ◽  
M. Lo Bello ◽  
L. E. Derchi
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Doppler Ultrasonography ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Color Doppler Ultrasonography ◽  
Tissue Mass ◽  
Vascular Impedance ◽  
The Us ◽  
Soft Tissue Masses ◽  
Malignant Lesions

Purpose: To evaluate the capability of color Doppler ultrasonography to differentiate between benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors. Material and Methods: We reviewed the ultrasonographic (US) and color Doppler (CD) findings in 46 consecutive patients with a palpable periskeletal mass. The presence of 3 or more vascular hila and of tortuous and irregular internal vessels within the lesions was considered an indication of malignancy. The CD diagnosis was compared with that obtained at US alone. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of CD were respectively 85% and 92%; these values were higher than those obtained at US alone, respectively 75% and 50%. Arteriovenous malformations presented as lesions with large internal vessels that had low vascular impedance and were easily diagnosed. The waveform patterns within solid tumors were not specific. Conclusion: At present, US is commonly employed to confirm the presence of a suspected soft-tissue mass, to locate it accurately, and to indicate its nature. CD findings enhance the role of the US technique in such lesions. The combined use of US and CD can allow the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions, and thus provide a better basis for treatment.

Color doppler ultrasonography of soft-tissue masses

1998 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Lagalla ◽  
A. Iovane ◽  
G. Caruso ◽  
M. Lo Bello ◽  
L. E. Derchi
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Doppler Ultrasonography ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Color Doppler Ultrasonography ◽  
Soft Tissue Masses

scholarly journals Contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasonography increases diagnostic accuracy for soft tissue tumors

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1654-1660 ◽  
Author(s):  
NAOTO OEBISU ◽  
MANABU HOSHI ◽  
MAKOTO IEGUCHI ◽  
JUN TAKADA ◽  
TADASHI IWAI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Doppler Ultrasonography ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Color Doppler Ultrasonography ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

Malignant Soft Tissue Masses

2019 ◽  
pp. 346-350
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Blount
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Mass ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Diagnostic Delay ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Diagnostic Challenge ◽  
Tissue Mass ◽  
Soft Tissue Masses ◽  
Malignant Soft Tissue

Chapter 66 discusses malignant soft tissue masses. Soft tissue malignancies are less common than those of benign origin but should be in the differential diagnosis for any soft tissue mass. Malignant soft tissue tumors have a wide range of clinical and imaging appearances, which can present a diagnostic challenge. If the imaging features of the soft tissue mass are not entirely characteristic for a benign diagnosis, biopsy should be performed. After initial radiographs, MRI is considered the best imaging modality to characterize malignant soft tissue lesions. Prompt diagnosis is critical because a diagnostic delay is associated with a worse clinical outcome.

scholarly journals Role of diffusion-weighted MRI in evaluation of pediatric musculoskeletal soft tissue masses

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Ali El-Adalany ◽  
Nevertiti Kamal El-Din Eid ◽  
Salma Othman ◽  
Dina El-Metwally
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Adc Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Soft Tissue Masses ◽  
Malignant Lesions ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background In pediatric patients, soft tissue masses encompass a wide heterogeneous group of benign and malignant lesions. MRI is a powerful diagnostic tool in the workup of soft tissue tumors in children, and it helps in characterization of lesion and evaluation of the extent of the lesion. However, conventional MRI techniques are not specific in differentiating benign from malignant lesions. So to improve characterization of tumors, DWI was added to MRI techniques as it increases sensitivity and specificity by detecting the micro-diffusion changes of water into intra- and extracellular spaces. The aim of this work was to highlight the diagnostic value of DWI in detection and characterization of different musculoskeletal soft tissue masses in pediatrics. Results There was a statistically significant difference regarding the mean ADC value of benign and malignant masses (P value = 0.001*). The mean ADC value for all benign masses (n = 41) was 1.495 ± 0.55 SD × 10–3 mm2/s, while the mean ADC value for all malignant masses (n = 21) was 0.449 ± 0.27 SD × 10–3 mm2/s. The cutoff ADC value between benign and malignant masses was 0.88 × 10–3 mm2/s. This cutoff ADC value has sensitivity of 100.0%, specificity of 92.3%, PPV of 66.7%, NPV of 100.0% and diagnostic accuracy of 93.3%. Conclusion In pediatric patients, DWI is an innovative valuable noninvasive imaging technique for characterization of musculoskeletal soft tissue masses and discrimination between benign and malignant masses.

scholarly journals Soft tissue masses: distribution of entities and rate of malignancy in small lesions

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix G. Gassert ◽  
Florian T. Gassert ◽  
Katja Specht ◽  
Carolin Knebel ◽  
Ulrich Lenze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Benign Lesion ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Mr Images ◽  
Tissue Mass ◽  
Malignancy Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Soft Tissue Masses

Abstract Background Small soft tissue masses are often falsely assumed to be benign and resected with failure to achieve tumor-free margins. Therefore, this study retrospectively investigated the distribution of histopathologic diagnosis to be encountered in small soft tissue tumors (≤ 5 cm) in a large series of a tertiary referral center. Methods Patients with a soft tissue mass (STM) with a maximum diameter of 5 cm presenting at our institution over a period of 10 years, who had undergone preoperative Magnetic resonance imaging and consequent biopsy or/and surgical resection, were included in this study. A final histopathological diagnosis was available in all cases. The maximum tumor diameter was determined on MR images by one radiologist. Moreover, tumor localization (head/neck, trunk, upper extremity, lower extremity, hand, foot) and depth (superficial / deep to fascia) were assessed. Results In total, histopathologic results and MR images of 1753 patients were reviewed. Eight hundred seventy patients (49.63%) showed a STM ≤ 5 cm and were therefore included in this study (46.79 +/− 18.08 years, 464 women). Mean maximum diameter of the assessed STMs was 2.88 cm. Of 870 analyzed lesions ≤ 5 cm, 170 (19.54%) were classified as superficial and 700 (80.46%) as deep. The malignancy rate of all lesions ≤ 5 cm was at 22.41% (superficial: 23.53% / deep: 22.14%). The malignancy rate dropped to 16.49% (20.79% / 15.32%) when assessing lesions ≤ 3 cm (p = 0.007) and to 15.0% (18.18% / 13.79%) when assessing lesions ≤ 2 cm (p = 0.006). Overall, lipoma was the most common benign lesion of superficial STMs (29.41%) and tenosynovial giant cell tumor was the most common benign lesion of deep STMs (23.29%). Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma was the most common malignant diagnosis among both, superficial (5.29%) and deep (3.57%) STMs. Conclusions The rate of malignancy decreased significantly with tumor size in both, superficial and deep STMs. The distribution of entities was different between superficial and deep STMs, yet there was no significant difference found in the malignancy rate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document