Hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) is not “female erectile dysfunction (ED)”: challenges with the characterization of HSDD in women based on a systematic literature review

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1069-1080
Author(s):  
Sheryl A. Kingsberg ◽  
Shruti Nambiar ◽  
Swagata Karkare ◽  
Nandini Hadker ◽  
Michelle Lim-Watson ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 2035-2035
Author(s):  
R. Balon

Pharmacotherapy of male sexual dysfunction(s) has developed similar to pharmacotherapy of depression. Some of the treatments for male sexual dysfunctions have been used based on old observations or myths (e.g., so called aphrodisiacs), some based on intuition (e.g. hormones for hypoactive sexual desire disorder), and some were discovered serendipitously (e.g., PDE-5 inhibitors). New, “me-too” PDE-5 inhibitors (e.g., avanafil, mirodenafil, udenafil) are being developed, similar to the development of new antidepressants. A rational approach to pharmacotherapy of hypoactive sexual desire disorder, male erectile disorder and premature ejaculation is being conceptualized (no pharmacotherapy for delayed orgasm is available at present). For instance, the approach to treatment of erectile dysfunction has been frequently staged into three levels (Level I: psychotherapy, oral preparations including hormones, vacuum erectile devices; Level II: intraurethral and intracorporeal application of various preparations; Level III: microsurgery, prosthesis). The management of pharmacotherapy failures, as well as combination of approaches to sexual dysfunctions, (e.g., PDE-5 and hormones for erectile dysfunction) have not been systematically studied. This presentation discusses a rational approach to staging pharmacotherapy of male sexual dysfunction and will also discuss potential combination of therapeutic modalities, especially for treatment resistant cases.


2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 812-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard DeRogatis ◽  
Raymond C. Rosen ◽  
Irwin Goldstein ◽  
Brian Werneburg ◽  
Joan Kempthorne‐Rawson ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Saadat ◽  
Yunes Panahi ◽  
Milad Hosseinialhashemi ◽  
Ali Kabir ◽  
Khaled Rahmani ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Livio Cricelli ◽  
Michele Grimaldi ◽  
Silvia Vermicelli

AbstractIn recent years, Open Innovation (OI) and crowdsourcing have been very popular topics in the innovation management literature, attracting significant interest and attention, and inspiring a rich production of publications. Although these two topics share common themes and address similar managerial challenges, to the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic literature review that digs deep into the intersection of both fields. To fill in this gap a joint review of crowdsourcing and OI topics is both timely and of interest. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to carry out a comprehensive, systematic, and objective review of academic research to help shed light on the relationship between OI and crowdsourcing. For this purpose, we reviewed the literature published on these two topics between 2008 and 2019, applying two bibliometric techniques, co-citation and co-word analysis. We obtained the following results: (i) we provide a qualitative analysis of the emerging and trending themes, (ii) we discuss a characterization of the intersection between OI and crowdsourcing, identifying four dimensions (strategic, managerial, behavioral, and technological), (iii) we present a schematic reconceptualization of the thematic clusters, proposing an integrated view. We conclude by suggesting promising opportunities for future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document