Melodrama’s Fictional System: Fernell Franco’s Photography and the Golden Age of Mexican Cinema

2021 ◽  
pp. 3-22
Author(s):  
Juanita Solano Roa
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Dave Evans

<p>The influence of the mass media is a contentious issue, especially in regards to the Golden Age of Mexican Cinema in the mid-twentieth century. These melodramatic films have often been viewed by critics as instruments of hegemony. However, melodrama contains an inherent ambivalence, as it not only has a potential for imparting dominant messages but also offers a platform from which to defy and exceed the restraining boundaries imposed by dominant ideologies. An examination of a number of important Golden Age films, especially focussing on their contradictory tensions and their portrayals of modernity, illustrates this. The Nosotros los pobres series serves as an example of how melodramatic elements are incorporated into popular Mexican films and how melodrama could be used as an ideological tool to encourage the state’s goals. Similarly, the maternal melodrama Cuando los hijos se van uses the family to represent the processes of conflict and negotiation that Mexicans experienced as a result of modernization. Consistent with the reactionary nature of melodrama and its simultaneous suggestive potential, the film combines a Catholic worldview with an underlying allegory of moving forward. The issue of progress is also at the centre of a number of films starring iconic actor Pedro Infante, which offer an avenue for exploring what modernisation might mean for male identity in Mexico. His films show a masculinity in transition and how lower-class men could cope with this change. Likewise, the depiction of women in Golden Age film overall supports the stabilising goals of the 1940s Revolutionary government, while also providing some transgressive figures. Therefore, these films helped the Mexican audience process the sudden modernization of the post-Revolutionary period, which was in the state’s best interest; however, the masses were also able to reconfigure the messages of these films and find their own sense of meaning in them.</p>


Author(s):  
Andrew Paxman

With President Ávila Camacho’s approval, Jenkins began building a nationwide dominance in film exhibition, just as Mexican cinema was at its peak. How a gringo come to dominate so nationalistic an industry owed something to Jenkins’s friendship with the president and something to a quid pro quo. Given high inflation and labor unrest, the state had to accommodate restive unions, while Jenkins needed protection from laws restricting monopolies and foreign ownership. The state granted Jenkins protections—for his multiplying theaters provided escapist entertainment for the masses and enabled the state to better distribute propaganda (patriotic films and newsreels)—but in return it forced him to concede to labor at Atencingo and textile mill La Trinidad. Jenkins faced further challenges. In 1944, Mary died; in 1945, Maximino died; and in 1946, Atencingo manager Manuel Pérez was struck with paralysis. The latter events promoted Jenkins to quit sugar and focus on film.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tania Celina Ruiz Ojeda

Mexican film was aligned with the state since its origins, but this union only generated continuous cinematographic production beginning in the 1930s, when the government of President Lázaro Cárdenas del Río (1934‐40) signed a contract with the production company that would go to become one of the most important producers of Mexican cinema of the Golden Age: la Cinematográfica Latinoamericana S.A. (CLASA). This article analyses the changes of discourse and narrative style used in these newsreels during three consecutive presidential terms and outlines the working dynamics and the cinematic discourse of each government, as well as how newsreel formats reflected the agenda of each head of state.


2021 ◽  
pp. 189-217
Author(s):  
Martha I. Chew Sánchez
Keyword(s):  

This chapter analyses the continuous negotiations and dialogues that are happening on both sides of the Atlantic regarding the construction of Mexicanidad and Hispanismo through música ranchera. The author emphasizes the role of Hispanismo during La época de oro del cine mexicano (The Golden Age of Mexican Cinema) from 1936 to 1959: for example, in the construction of Mexicanidad through Chavela Vargas, and through the appropriation of the estilo bravío performed originally by Lucha Reyes. This chapter explores especially the legacy of Cuco Sanchez and Chavela Vargas and concludes with a consideration of the new cultural dialogues that are currently taking place regarding música ranchera.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document