There are no Answers, Only Choices: Teaching Ethical Decision Making in Social Work

2007 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mel Gray ◽  
Jill Gibbons
2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. McCormick ◽  
Patti Stowell-Weiss ◽  
Jennifer Carson ◽  
Gerald Tebo ◽  
Inga Hanson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 809-825
Author(s):  
Radek Trnka ◽  
Martin Kuška ◽  
Peter Tavel ◽  
Aleš A. Kuběna

2003 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rujla Osmo ◽  
Ruth Landau

In this study, the authors examined the impact of religiosity on social workers' ranking of ethical principles. The findings indicate that religiosity may be a distinguishing variable in some, but not all, contexts of ethical decision making in social work practice. The religiosity of religious social workers may influence their ethical decision making in situations with religious connotations. Moreover, religious social workers' ethical hierarchies seem to be more consistent both in different contexts and in comparison to those of secular social workers. The prospect that social workers may be influenced in some situations by a competing code of rules in conflict with the professional code of ethics emphasizes the need for social workers' awareness of their own belief system.


2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 61-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stan Houston

Child and family social work is beset by value dilemmas. In this paper Stan Houston attempts to find a way out of these entanglements by delving into the moral philosophy of Jurgen Habermas. It is argued that Habermas's ideas on moral discourse enable social workers and others involved in a child's life to reach ethical decisions. Towards the end of the paper, the argument is grounded in two case examples centering on child placement decisions. At this juncture it is argued that Habermas's position creates certain problems for ethical decision-making involving children, but that these problems can be assuaged by a range of compensatory actions including advocacy and critical reflection.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane R. Brady ◽  
David A. McLeod ◽  
Jimmy A. Young

This paper will discuss social media technology in the context of social work education. While social media technology is prevalent in social work education, most discourse about ethical use of social media in the classroom has taken a prescriptive and overly cautious approach that neglects the context dependent nature that social work educators teach in as well as the overwhelmingly positive potential of social media technology in the classroom. This paper utilizes social constructivist theory and the Competing Values framework to guide the development of an ethical decision making framework for social work educators to use in order to create dynamic classroom policies related to social media technology. The authors strive to make a modest contribution to the existing literature related to social media technology and social work through the development of this new ethical decision making framework and discourse related to social media technology, ethics, and social work education.


2021 ◽  
pp. 147332502110501
Author(s):  
María-Jesús Úriz ◽  
Juan-Jesús Viscarret ◽  
Alberto Ballestero

In this article we address the ethical decision-making processes of social work professionals in Spain during the first wave of COVID-19. We present some of the findings from a broader international research project led by professor Sarah Banks and carried out in collaboration with the International Federation of Social Workers. The first wave of COVID-19 had a major impact in Spain, hitting harder the most vulnerable groups. In this unprecedented and unexpected context, social workers had to make difficult ethical decisions on fundamental issues such as respecting service-user’s autonomy, prioritizing wellbeing, maintaining confidentiality or deciding the fair distribution of the scarce resources. There were moments of uncertainty and difficult institutional responses. The broader international project was carried out using an online questionnaire addressed to social work professionals in several countries. In this article, through several specific cases, we examine the ethical decision-making processes of social work professionals in Spain, as well as the way to resolve that situations. We have used a qualitative content analysis with a deductive approach to analyze the responses and cases. Findings show many difficult situations concerning the prioritization of the wellbeing of users without limiting their autonomy, the invention of new organizational protocols to provide support and resources for vulnerable people… Social workers had to manage the bureaucracy and had to solve some emergency situations getting personally involved or developing other cooperation mechanisms. The pandemic forced them to look for new forms of social intervention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document