Time to nutritional recovery and its determinants among children aged 6 to 59 months with severe acute malnutrition admitted to stabilization centers of WagHimra Zone, Northeast Ethiopia

Author(s):  
Zemichael Tadesse ◽  
Destaw Fetene Teshome ◽  
Ayenew Molla Lakew ◽  
Getu Debalkie ◽  
Kedir Abdela Gonete
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Telahun Kasa Tefera ◽  
Solomon Mekonnen Abebe ◽  
Melkamu Tamir Hunegnaw ◽  
Freezer Girma Mekasha

Background. Malnutrition has been among the most common public health problems in the world, especially in developing countries including Ethiopia. Even though the Ethiopian government launched stabilization centers in different hospitals, there are limited data on how long children will stay in treatment centers to recover from severe acute malnutrition. This study aimed to assess the time to recovery and its predictors among children 6–59 months with severe acute malnutrition admitted to public hospitals in East Amhara, Northeast Ethiopia. Methods. Institution-based, prospective cohort study was conducted in seven public hospitals in East Amhara and a total of 341 children were included in the study. The results were determined by Kaplan–Meier procedure, log-rank test, and Cox-regression to predict the time to recovery and to identify the predictors of recovery time. Variables having P value ≤0.2 during binary analysis were entered into multivarable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. The nutritional recovery rate was 6.9 per 100 person-days with a median nutritional recovery time of 11 days (an interquartile range of 6). The independent predictors like using NG tube for feeding (AHR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.27–0.71), not entering phase 2 on day 10 (AHR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.12–0.29), and being admitted to referral hospitals (AHR = 0.52 95% CI: 0.37–0.73) were associated with longer periods of nutritional recovery time. Conclusion. Both the recovery rate and the recovery time were within the acceptable minimum standards. But, special attention has to be given to children who failed to enter phase 2 on day 10, for those who needed NG tube for feeding, and for those admitted to referral hospitals during inpatient management.


2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 709-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naouale Maataoui ◽  
Céline Langendorf ◽  
Fatou Berthe ◽  
Jumamurat R Bayjanov ◽  
Willem van Schaik ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Routine amoxicillin for children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition raises concerns of increasing antibiotic resistance. We performed an ancillary study nested within a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Niger testing the role of routine 7 day amoxicillin therapy in nutritional recovery of children 6 to 59 months of age with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition. Methods We screened 472 children for rectal carriage of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) as well as their household siblings under 5 years old, at baseline and Week 1 (W1) and Week 4 (W4) after start of therapy, and characterized strains by WGS. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01613547. Results Carriage in index children at baseline was similar in the amoxicillin and the placebo groups (33.8% versus 27.9%, P = 0.17). However, acquisition of ESBL-E in index children at W1 was higher in the amoxicillin group than in the placebo group (53.7% versus 32.2%, adjusted risk ratio = 2.29, P = 0.001). Among 209 index and sibling households possibly exposed to ESBL-E transmission, 16 (7.7%) had paired strains differing by ≤10 SNPs, suggesting a high probability of transmission. This was more frequent in households from the amoxicillin group than from the placebo group [11.5% (12/104) versus 3.8% (4/105), P = 0.04]. Conclusions Among children exposed to amoxicillin, ESBL-E colonization was more frequent and the risk of transmission to siblings higher. Routine amoxicillin should be carefully balanced with the risks associated with ESBL-E colonization.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. e2020003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mekonen Adimasu ◽  
Girum Sebsibie ◽  
Fikrtemariam Abebe ◽  
Getaneh Baye ◽  
Kerebih Abere

OBJECTIVES: Recovery time from severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is often a neglected topic despite its clinical impact. Although a few studies have examined nutritional recovery time, the length of hospitalization in those studies varied greatly. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the recovery time from SAM and to identify predictors of length of hospitalization among under-5 children.METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 423 under-5 children with SAM who had been admitted to Yekatit 12 Hospital. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate time to nutritional recovery, and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors.RESULTS: The nutritional recovery rate was 81.3%, and the median recovery time was 15.00 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.61 to 16.39). Age, daily weight gain per kilogram of body weight, vaccination status, and the existence of at least 1 comorbidity (e.g., pneumonia, stunting, shock, and deworming) were found to be significant independent predictors of nutritional recovery time. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for nutritional recovery decreased by 1.9% for every 1-month increase in child age (aHR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97 to 0.99).CONCLUSIONS: The overall nutritional recovery time in this study was within the Sphere standards. However, approximately 13.0% of children stayed in the hospital for more than 28.00 days, which is an unacceptably large proportion. Daily weight gain of ≥8 g/kg, full vaccination, and deworming with albendazole or mebendazole reduced nutritional recovery time. Conversely, older age, pneumonia, stunting, and shock increased nutritional recovery time.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadele Girum ◽  
Ebrahim Muktar ◽  
Abdulsemed Worku

Background:Severe acute malnutrition has been managed at Hospital stabilization centers until the management at health center based stabilization centers was started recently. However, the treatment outcome was not assessed in relation to the existing hospital-based management. Therefore, this study comparatively assessed the treatment outcome and survival status of severe acute malnutrition among Health center-based and hospital-based stabilization centers. The finding will be used by healthcare providers, planners and policymakers at large.Methods:Randomly selected 400 records of under-five children admitted to five stabilization centers (2 hospitals and 3 health center) in Gedeo Zone was included. Data was entered by Epi Info version 7 and analyzed by STATA version 11. Survival difference was checked by life table and Kaplan-Mier with Log-Rank test. Cox proportional hazards model was built by forward stepwise procedure; compared to likely hood ratio test and Harrell’s concordance and fitness checked by the cox-snell residual plot.Result:The study showed that the cumulative probability of Survival is significantly different at Hospital stabilization center and health center stabilization centers (p.value <0.001) with shorter survival at hospitals. During the follow-up period, 28(13.86%) children from hospital and 5(2.5%) children from health center died, while 155(76.73%) children from the hospital and 145(73.23%) children from health center got cured. Eighteen (4.5%)children were defaulted. Death is significantly higher at the hospital, while default rate and cure rate are not significantly different. Altered pulse rate [AHR=2.44, 95% CI =1.47-4, p<0.001], NG tube insertion [AHR=1.8, 95% CI =1.04-3.1, p=0.038], Anemia [AHR=1.53, 95% CI =1.02-2.3, p<0.041] and Hypoglycemia [AHR=2.78, 95% CI =1.8-4.3, p<0.001] were found to be independent predictors of death.Conclusion:The survival of children in hospital is shorter and mortality is higher. An overall treatment outcome was in acceptable ranges. Intervention to further reduce deaths at hospitals has to focus on children with comorbidities and altered general conditions and early detection.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mekonen Adimasu Kebede ◽  
Girum Sebsbie Teshome ◽  
Fkirtemariam Abebe Fenta ◽  
Melaku Bimerew Getahun

Abstract Background Devastatingly, the number of children with SAM is still growing globally. Severe acute malnutrition is the third most common contributing factor to the deaths of under-5 children worldwide. According to the World Health Organization, severe acute malnutrition causes 1 million deaths annually via increased susceptibility to death from severe infection. Ethiopia is one of the countries with highest under-5 child mortality rate, with malnutrition underlying to 28% of all children deaths. In Ethiopia, some studies reported an alarming death and default rates which indicate the need for further study to assess contributing factors to the treatment outcomes of severe acute malnutrition. Therefore, the intention of this research is to determine the treatment outcomes of severe acute malnutrition and identify predictors of nutritional recovery. Method: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 423 under-5 children with severe acute malnutrition. Logistic regression analysis was performed and an adjusted odd ratio with 95%CI was used to determine independent predictors. Result The overall recovery, death and default rates were 81.3%, 11.1% and 7.6% respectively. Age, vaccination status, HIV/AIDS, pneumonia, diarrhea and stunting were found to be significant independent predictors of treatment outcomes. The adjusted odd ratio (AOR) for nutritional recovery increased by 14.6% for every 1-month increase in child age (AOR = 1.146; 95%CI: 1.052–1.249). Regarding vaccination status, those under-5 children who were fully vaccinated for their age were about 4 time more likely to recover than their counterparts (AOR = 4.242; 95%CI: 1.566–11.491) Conclusion In conclusion, the overall nutritional recovery and default rate in this study were in the acceptable range of international standard even though the death rate was higher. Age and full vaccination were proven to increase nutritional recovery. Conversely, the presence of HIV/AIDS, pneumonia, diarrhea and stunting were proven to decrease nutritional recovery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kieran S. O’Brien ◽  
Ali Sié ◽  
Clarisse Dah ◽  
Millogo Ourohire ◽  
Ahmed M. Arzika ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Given the high risk of infectious mortality among children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM), the World Health Organization recommends routine administration of a broad-spectrum antibiotic like amoxicillin as part of the management of uncomplicated SAM. However, evidence for the efficacy of amoxicillin to improve nutritional recovery or reduce mortality has been mixed. With a long half-life and evidence of efficacy to reduce mortality in high-risk populations, azithromycin is a potential alternative to amoxicillin in the management of SAM. In this pilot study, we aim to compare the efficacy of azithromycin to amoxicillin to improve nutritional outcomes in children with uncomplicated SAM. Methods This pilot randomized controlled trial will enroll 300 children with uncomplicated SAM from 6 Centre de Santé et de Promotion Sociale in the Boromo health district in Burkina Faso. Eligible children are randomized to receive a single directly observed dose of oral azithromycin or a 7-day course of oral amoxicillin in addition to the standard package of care for uncomplicated SAM. Enrolled children are followed weekly until nutritional recovery, and all children return for a final study visit at 8 weeks after enrollment. Anthropometric indicators, vital status, and clinical outcomes are monitored at each visit and compared by arm. Primary feasibility outcomes include enrollment potential, refusals, loss to follow-up, and completeness of data collection. The primary clinical outcome is weight gain (g/kg/day) over the 8-week study period. Discussion This pilot trial will establish the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomized controlled trial to evaluate alternative antibiotics in this setting and provide preliminary evidence for the efficacy of azithromycin compared to amoxicillin to improve outcomes for children with SAM. Trial registration This trial was first registered on clinicaltrials.gov on 26 June 2018 (NCT03568643).


2008 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 512-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Fergusson ◽  
J Chinkhumba ◽  
C Grijalva-Eternod ◽  
T Banda ◽  
C Mkangama ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document