Editorial: The United States Country Studies Program on Water Resources Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change: Scope and Significance

1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-110
Author(s):  
Kenneth M. Strzepek
2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgakakos, A. ◽  
P. Fleming ◽  
M. Dettinger ◽  
C. Peters-Lidard ◽  
Terese (T. C.) Richmond ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T. van Markham ◽  
C.S.A. (Kris) Koppen

This article investigates the messages about climate change that ten nature protection organizations in Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States communicate to their members and the public through their Internet sites, member magazines, and annual reports. Based on analysis of this content, we conclude that all the organizations address climate change, but to varying extents and in differing ways. All of the organizations note that climate change is a major problem, has a significant impact on nature, and should be addressed mainly via mitigation. With the partial exception of the Dutch groups, all also inform their members about domestic climate change politics. Other themes, including international dimensions of climate change, adaptation to climate change, consumer behavior, collaboration with and criticism of business, and efforts to pressure business or government received less emphasis overall. How much emphasis the organizations gave these themes was conditioned by their traditions, constituencies, national context, and international affiliations.


2012 ◽  
Vol 114 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 71-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Baron ◽  
E. K. Hall ◽  
B. T. Nolan ◽  
J. C. Finlay ◽  
E. S. Bernhardt ◽  
...  

Fact Sheet ◽  
2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan H. Welch ◽  
Sharon A. Watkins ◽  
Dennis R. Helsel ◽  
Michael J. Focazio

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 8335
Author(s):  
Jasmina Nedevska

Climate change litigation has emerged as a powerful tool as societies steer towards sustainable development. Although the litigation mainly takes place in domestic courts, the implications can be seen as global as specific climate rulings influence courts across national borders. However, while the phenomenon of judicialization is well-known in the social sciences, relatively few have studied issues of legitimacy that arise as climate politics move into courts. A comparatively large part of climate cases have appeared in the United States. This article presents a research plan for a study of judges’ opinions and dissents in the United States, regarding the justiciability of strategic climate cases. The purpose is to empirically study how judges navigate a perceived normative conflict—between the litigation and an overarching ideal of separation of powers—in a system marked by checks and balances.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document