Relapse prevention for alcohol use disorders: combined acamprosate and cue exposure therapy as aftercare

Author(s):  
Lene Stryhn ◽  
Mathias Bach Larsen ◽  
Anna Mejldal ◽  
Christian Sibbersen ◽  
Dorthe Grüner Nielsen ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 2053-2063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon P. Byrne ◽  
Paul Haber ◽  
Andrew Baillie ◽  
Vickie Giannopolous ◽  
Kirsten Morley

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 195-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelina I. Mellentin ◽  
Lotte Skøt ◽  
Bent Nielsen ◽  
Gerard M. Schippers ◽  
Anette S. Nielsen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 182-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Brière ◽  
Laure Tocanier ◽  
Phillippe Allain ◽  
Dewi Le Gal ◽  
Guillaume Allet ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 395 ◽  
pp. 112839
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Kantak ◽  
Jamie M. Gauthier ◽  
Elon Mathieson ◽  
Eudokia Knyazhanskaya ◽  
Pedro Rodriguez-Echemendia ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelina Isabella Mellentin ◽  
Bent Nielsen ◽  
Anette Søgaard Nielsen ◽  
Fei Yu ◽  
Anna Mejldal ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Cue exposure therapy (CET) is a psychological approach developed to prepare individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) for confronting alcohol and associated stimuli in real life. CET has shown promise when treating AUD in group sessions, but it is unknown whether progressing from group sessions to using a mobile phone app is an effective delivery pathway. OBJECTIVE The objectives of this study were to investigate (1) whether CET as aftercare would increase the effectiveness of primary treatment with cognitive behavior therapy, and (2) whether CET delivered through a mobile phone app would be similarly effective to CET via group sessions. METHODS A total of 164 individuals with AUD were randomized to one of three groups: CET as group aftercare (CET group), CET as fully automated mobile phone app aftercare (CET app), or aftercare as usual. Study outcomes were assessed face-to-face at preaftercare, postaftercare, and again at 6 months after aftercare treatment. Generalized mixed models were used to compare the trajectories of the groups over time on drinking, cravings, and use of urge-specific coping skills (USCS). RESULTS In all, 153 of 164 individuals (93%) completed assessments both at posttreatment and 6-month follow-up assessments. No differences in the trajectories of predicted means were found between the experimental groups (CET group and app) compared with aftercare as usual on drinking and craving outcomes over time. Both CET group (predicted mean difference 5.99, SE 2.59, z=2.31, P=.02) and the CET app (predicted mean difference 4.90, SE 2.26, z=2.31, P=.02) showed increased use of USCS compared to aftercare as usual at posttreatment, but this effect was reduced at the 6-month follow-up. No differences were detected between the two experimental CET groups on any outcomes. CONCLUSIONS CET with USCS delivered as aftercare either via group sessions or a mobile phone app did not increase the effectiveness of primary treatment. This suggests that CET with USCS may not be an effective psychological approach for the aftercare of individuals treated for AUD. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02298751; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02298751


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Ghiţă ◽  
Olga Hernández-Serrano ◽  
Jolanda Fernández-Ruiz ◽  
Manuel Moreno ◽  
Miquel Monras ◽  
...  

Aims: Attentional bias (AB), alcohol craving, and anxiety have important implications in the development and maintenance of alcohol use disorder (AUD). The current study aims to test the effectiveness of a Virtual Reality Cue-Exposure Therapy (VR-CET) to reduce levels of alcohol craving and anxiety and prompt changes in AB toward alcohol content.Method: A 49-year-old male participated in this study, diagnosed with severe AUD, who also used tobacco and illicit substances on an occasional basis and who made several failed attempts to cease substance misuse. The protocol consisted of six VR-CET booster sessions and two assessment sessions (pre- and post-VR-CET) over the course of 5 weeks. The VR-CET program consisted of booster therapy sessions based on virtual reality (VR) exposure to preferred alcohol-related cues and contexts. The initial and final assessment sessions were focused on exploring AB, alcohol craving, and anxiety using paper-and-pencil instruments and the eye-tracking (ET) and VR technologies at different time points.Results: Pre and post assessment sessions indicated falls on the scores of all instruments assessing alcohol craving, anxiety, and AB.Conclusions: This case report, part of a larger project, demonstrates the effectiveness of the VR-CET booster sessions in AUD. In the post-treatment measurements, a variety of instruments showed a change in the AB pattern and an improvement in craving and anxiety responses. As a result of the systematic desensitization, virtual exposure gradually reduced the responses to significant alcohol-related cues and contexts. The implications for AB, anxiety and craving are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document