Integrating Student Learning and Faculty Research Through Use of Students as Subjects

In recent years, advocates for research-based education have publicized many examples of passive research involvement, defined as undergraduates learning about the content and lived experience of research at their institution. But the qualitative dimensions of passive research involvement remain unknown. The results show a range of experiences in student learning about faculty research.

Download Full-text

Collaborative Learning in the Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Classroom

Perspectives on Issues in Higher Education ◽

10.1044/ihe11.1.9 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

pp. 9-11 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Carolyn S. Potts ◽

Sarah M. Ginsberg

Keyword(s):

Collaborative Learning ◽

Student Retention ◽

Student Learning ◽

Student Learning Outcomes ◽

Retention Rates ◽

Speech Language Pathology ◽

Traditional Lecture ◽

Language Pathology ◽

Improve Student Learning

Abstract In recent years, colleges and universities across the country have been called upon to increase the quality of education provided and to improve student retention rates. In response to this challenge, many faculty are exploring alternatives to the traditional “lecture-centered” approach of higher education in an attempt to increase student learning and satisfaction. Collaborative learning is one method of teaching, which has been demonstrated to improve student learning outcomes.

Download Full-text

Redesigning Introduction to Communication Disorders

Perspectives on Issues in Higher Education ◽

10.1044/ihe13.2.40 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 13 (2) ◽

pp. 40-48 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

John Wm. Folkins

Keyword(s):

Student Learning ◽

Student Evaluation ◽

Good Practice ◽

Communication Disorders ◽

Team Experience ◽

Team Activity ◽

Class Period ◽

Written Assignments ◽

Principles Of Good Practice ◽

Overall Effectiveness

A class of 58 students in Introduction to Communication Disorders was divided into eight teams of approximately seven students each. The teams sat together all semester and participated in at least one team activity (team discussions, in-class written assignments, and team quizzes) in every class period. Teams also were used for taking roll and reviewing for examinations. There was no decline in student evaluation of the overall effectiveness of the course or in examination scores when compared to when this course was taught with half the number of students and no teams. Students evaluated the team experience highly and appeared to enjoy competition among teams. Using teams was successful in creating experiences that foster student learning as embodied in Chickering and Gameson’s principles of good practice.

Download Full-text