Environmental Values and the Social Amplification of Risk: An Examination of How Environmental Values and Media Use Influence Predispositions for Public Engagement in Wildlife Management Decision Making

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip S. Hart ◽  
Erik C. Nisbet ◽  
James E. Shanahan
2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 395-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
MELISSA L. ANTHONY ◽  
BARBARA A. KNUTH ◽  
T. BRUCE LAUBER

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-41
Author(s):  
Angela K. Fuller ◽  
Daniel J. Decker ◽  
Michael V. Schiavone ◽  
Ann B. Forstchen

Risk Analysis ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Burns ◽  
Paul Slovic ◽  
Roger E. Kasperson ◽  
Jeanne X. Kasperson ◽  
Ortwin Renn ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Tekieli ◽  
Marion Festing ◽  
Xavier Baeten

Abstract. Based on responses from 158 reward managers located at the headquarters or subsidiaries of multinational enterprises, the present study examines the relationship between the centralization of reward management decision making and its perceived effectiveness in multinational enterprises. Our results show that headquarters managers perceive a centralized approach as being more effective, while for subsidiary managers this relationship is moderated by the manager’s role identity. Referring to social identity theory, the present study enriches the standardization versus localization debate through a new perspective focusing on psychological processes, thereby indicating the importance of in-group favoritism in headquarters and the influence of subsidiary managers’ role identities on reward management decision making.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document