Rye Grass as a Catch Crop in Spring Barley

1993 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Andersen ◽  
Carl Christian Olsen
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Wilczewski ◽  
Anna Piotrowska-Długosz ◽  
Grzegorz Lemańczyk
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 129-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tek Bahadur Sapkota ◽  
Margrethe Askegaard ◽  
Mette Lægdsmand ◽  
Jørgen E. Olesen

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 1731-1742
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Lemańczyk ◽  
Edward Wilczewski

Agriculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 394
Author(s):  
Edward Wilczewski ◽  
Józef Sadkiewicz ◽  
Anna Piotrowska-Długosz ◽  
Lech Gałęzewski

Catch crop cultivation for green manure is considered to be a sustainable agricultural strategy whose main goal is to mitigate the negative effects of inappropriate plant sequent by increasing the soil biological activity, improving the nutrient content and reducing their loss from soil. Additionally, correct catch crop management is expected to improve the yield of consequent crops as well as their quality parameters. The effects of field pea when used as a catch crop, either incorporated in autumn or mulched and incorporated in spring vs. a control—without a catch crop on the soil chemical properties (total N, organic C, available forms of K and P) and the composition of spring barley grain and straw (total N, P, K, Ca) were studied for three years (2009 to 2011) in two-field, one-factor experiments, which were conducted on two different soil types (Luvisol and Phaeozem). The catch crop had no effect regarding the soil pH, soil organic C or total N content. In turn, applying a catch crop significantly affected the concentration of the available K (in both soils) and available P content (Phaeozem). The effect of a catch crop on the nutrients in the grain and straw of spring barley was associated with the soil type. In Luvisol, a catch crop, independent of its management, increased the total N and P in the grain and straw of spring barley. In Phaeozem, a catch crop that was incorporated in the autumn significantly increased the K content in grain.


Chemosphere ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 234-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.M.R. Jahangir ◽  
E.P. Minet ◽  
P. Johnston ◽  
A. Premrov ◽  
C.E. Coxon ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
Nyamdavaa Tsolmon ◽  
Friedel K Jürgen

The effect of different preceding crops, catch crops and manure application on the agronomic performance of potato was studied in two consequential years in an organic farming system. Within the study the effect of three different preceding crops: viz. lucerne, field pea and spring barley; incorporated catch crops as green manure: non-legume or mixture; and farmyard manure (30 tones ha-1) are tested on subsequent potato yield and tuber size distribution. The catch crop treatments were studied in comparison to control bare fallow. The subsequent crop response to preceding crops was negligible since there was no indication of a greater tuber yields (fresh tuber, marketable and dry matter) after legume pre-crops compared to barley. Catch crops and manure effects both slightly increased tuber dry matter yield from 4.9 tones ha-1 to 5.2 tones ha-1 in 2010 only, on the contrary dry matter yield was not affected by catch crop and manure in 2011. The significant interaction effect was found between year and catch crop for fresh and dry matter tuber yield and non-standard small sized tubers. Catch crops had a positive effect on potato yield only in 2010 when mineral nitrogen availability was low. The catch crops significantly (P < 0.01) increased the percentage of large sized tubers (> 65 mm in diameter); however catch crops even negatively affected potato medium sized tuber yield and quality. Significant (P < 0.01) interaction effect was found between year and catch crop for small sized tubers, also.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document