Luteal support with vaginal dydrogesterone increases pregnancy rate in patients with clomifene resistant polycystic ovary syndrome receiving letrozole for ovulation induction

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-219
Author(s):  
Mohamed Rezk ◽  
Haitham Hamza ◽  
El-Sayed El-Shamy
Author(s):  
Xinyue Zhang ◽  
Aiyan Zheng ◽  
Jihong Yang ◽  
Ting Feng ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
...  

AbstractThere is currently a dispute over the choice of ovulation induction treatment for infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The objective of this study is to compare the therapeutic effect of pulsed rhythmic administration protocol (PRAP) with conventional letrozole + human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) in patients with clomiphene-resistance polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). A retrospective analysis of 821 intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles between January 2015 and January 2020 was performed. Of these, 483 cycles were treated with a pulsed rhythmic administration protocol (PRAP), and 338 cycles were treated with conventional letrozole + HMG protocol (LHP). The therapeutic effect of the two protocols has been compared. The pregnancy rate was 18.07% in the LHP and 27.07% in the PRAP. The ongoing pregnancy rate in LHP was 14.46% and in PRAP was 22.73%. The research suggests that PRAP is more effective than LHP and could be an adequate ovulation induction strategy for the IUI cycle of patients with clomiphene-resistance PCOS.


Author(s):  
Mahija Sahu ◽  
Nihar Ranjan Rout

Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome is the commonest endocrinopathy resulting in anovulatory infertile young women. Clomifene citrate (clomiphene) is a long-standing standard drug for ovulation induction, and is still considered as first line option in PCOS women. However, clomiphene has certain disadvantage letrozole an aromatase inhibitor acts by reducing estrogen production and has no adverse effects on endometrium and cervical mucous. Indian PCOS women have high prevalence of insulin resistance and thus are likely to have high clomiphene resistance. So letrozole could prove to be a good alternative for ovulation induction in such women.Methods: This was a prospective randomized, parallel, comparative clinical trial of two ovulation induction drugs letrozole 5 mg versus clomiphene citrate 100 mg as first-line ovulation induction drug in infertile polycystic ovarian syndrome women. The target population of the study was one hundred infertile women with PCO (taking at least 2 Rotterdam’s parameters). 50 women were allocated to clomifene citrate and 50 were allocated to Letrozole for ovulation induction. Parameters like age, duration of infertility, B MI, ovulation rate, number of follicles, pregnancy rate, endometrial thickness were noted and analyzed.Results: In letrozole group, the ovulation rate, mono-follicular development, mean endometrial thickness and pregnancy rate was better in comparison to clomifene citrate group.Conclusions: The result of this study suggests that letrozole may replace clomiphene as the first line drug for ovulation induction in infertile PCOS women.


2014 ◽  
pp. 86-93
Author(s):  
Minh Tam Le

Backgrounds: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common causes of female infertility due to ovulation disorders. Clomiphene citrate (CC) is a first choice to restore ovulation but it has some side effects by estrogen receptor down-regulation. Aromatase inhibitor (AI) is a newer class of drugs which increases the production of endogenous FSH to stimulate ovulation. Subjects and methods: randomized control trial to compare 64 cases of infertile women with PCOS examined at the Hue University Hospital, alternately used AI (group I) or CC (group II) for ovulation induction from day 2 cycle. Follow-up follicle growth, endometrium and ovulation via ultrasound. Evaluation were done on 10th day cycle, day of hCG trigger and after administration of hCG. Results: Total of 64 PCOS cases distributed into 2 groups using alternatively AI and CC had similar characteristics with average age of 28.8 ± 4.6, the majority were primary infertility (84.4%), infertility duration was 2.6 ± 2.4 years, 85.9% had oligomenorrhrea or amenorrhea, normal body mass index accounts for 60.9% and 21.9% was lean. Evaluation of both groups on day 10 revealed no differences in the dominant follicle and endometrial thickness. Number of days until the follicle mature appears to be shorter in AI group (15.1 ± 2.9) compared to the CC group (16.5 ± 2.8) with statistical significance. The number of mature follicles in 2 groups were not different at a rate of 81.3% (AI) and 84.4% (CC) but a higher proportion of single mature follicle in the AI ​​group (71.9%) compared with the CC group (65.7%) and There is no case with 3-4 mature follicles in the AI group. The rate of thin endometrium (<8 mm) in the AI group (25%) was lower than the CC group (53.1%) with statistically significance and higher ovulation rate (68.8%) compared with the CC group (56.3%) but have not found statistically significant. Conclusion: Two drugs AI and CC potentially induce follicle development and ovulation similarly, but AI has the potential to be more effective than CC on factors such as the shorter stimulation duration, increasing rate of single follicle, limiting multiple pregnancies, improve endometrial thickness and higher ovulation rate. More researches are needed with a larger sample size to clarify the statistical significance of differences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document