Phytochemical and Insecticidal Study of the Avishan-e-denaii (Thymus daenensis Celak.) Essential Oil against the Melon Aphid (Aphis gossypii Glover)

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 545-553
Author(s):  
Mehran Zamani Verdi ◽  
Habib Abbasipour ◽  
Samira Goudarzvande Chegini
Euphytica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 205 (2) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danna Liang ◽  
Qijing Hu ◽  
Qiang Xu ◽  
Xiaohua Qi ◽  
Fucai Zhou ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert N. Kishaba ◽  
Steven J. Castle ◽  
Donald L. Coudriet ◽  
James D. McCreight ◽  
G. Weston Bohn

The spread of watermelon mosaic virus by the melon aphid (Aphis gossypii Glover) was 31%, 74%, and 71% less to a melon aphid-resistant muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) breeding line than to the susceptible recurrent parent in a field cage study. Aphid-resistant and susceptible plants served equally well as the virus source. The highest rate of infection (97.9%) was noted when target plants were all melon-aphid susceptible, least (26.7%) when the target plants were all melon-aphid resistant, and intermediate (69.4%) when the target plants were an equal mix of aphid-resistant and susceptible plants. The number of viruliferous aphids per plant required to cause a 50% infection varied from five to 20 on susceptible controls and from 60 to possibly more than 400 on a range of melon aphid-resistant populations. An F family from a cross of the melon aphid-resistant AR Topmark (AR TM) with the susceptible `PMR 45' had significantly less resistance to virus transmission than AR TM. Breeding line AR 5 (an aphid-resistant population with `PMR 5' as the recurrent parent) had significantly greater resistance to transmission than other aphid-resistant populations.


2008 ◽  
pp. 1093-1093
Author(s):  
Beata Gabrys ◽  
John L. Capinera ◽  
Jesusa C. Legaspi ◽  
Benjamin C. Legaspi ◽  
Lewis S. Long ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 551-556
Author(s):  
G.L.D. Leite ◽  
M.F. Souza ◽  
I.T. Souza Junior ◽  
L.S. Figueiredo ◽  
F.P.G. Bonfim ◽  
...  

The objective of this paper was to study the effect of four levels of organic fertilization (0, 3, 6 and 9 kg m-2) to produce the essential oil of Lippia sidoides Cham. (Verbenacea) and its pests. A higher number of red mite Tetranychus sp. (Acari: Tetranychiidae) was observed on the abaxial face of the median and basal leaves of L. sidoides plants with eight weeks of age cultivated with 6 kg m-2 of organic fertilization. On the other hand, the smallest number of this mite was noted in control (0 kg m-2). L. sidoides cultivated with 6 kg m-2 of organic fertilization produced a greater quantity of essential oil. The highest number of mealy bug Phenacoccus sp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) was observed on the apical leaves (both leaf surfaces) of L. sidoides plants with nine and ten weeks of age cultivated with 3 kg m-2 of organic fertilization. No significant effect of the organic fertilization on Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae) was detected. However, a greater number of this aphid and of its predator Scymnus sp. (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae) was observed on the abaxial face of the bottom leaves of L. sidoides plants with eight weeks of age. The dose of organic fertilization recommended for the production of essential oil of L. Sidoides is 6 kg m-2, however, one must pay attention to the fact this dosage favors the attack by Tetranychus sp.. And, when needed, pulverization must always be directed to the lower surface of the leaf.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. L. Sharma ◽  
S. C. Verma ◽  
R. S. Chandel ◽  
M. A. Shah ◽  
O. Gavkare

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document