Weight Communication: How Do Health Professionals Communicate about Weight with Their Patients in Primary Care Settings?

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Stephanie Aboueid ◽  
Rukhsana Ahmed ◽  
Monika Jasinska ◽  
Catherine Pouliot ◽  
Billie Jane Hermosura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Primary Care Settings

Tailoring Communications for Primary Care Settings

1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (02) ◽  
pp. 171-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Glassman ◽  
B. K. Rimer
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Contact Time ◽  
Behavioral Changes ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Medical Settings ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Professional Contact ◽  
Tailored Communications

AbstractIn more and more medical settings, physicians have less and less time to be effective communicators. To be effective, they need accurate, current information about their patients. Tailored health communications can facilitate positive patient-provider communications and foster behavioral changes conducive to health. Tailored communications (TCs) are produced for an individual based on information about that person. The focus of this report is on tailored print communications (TPCs). TPCs also enhance the process of evaluation, because they require a database and the collection of patient-specific information. We present a Tailoring Model for Primary Care that describes the steps involved in creating TPCs. We also provide examples from three ongoing studies in which TPCs are being used in order to illustrate the kinds of variables used for tailoring the products that are developed and how evaluation is conducted. TPCs offer opportunities to expand the reach of health professionals and to give personalized, individualized massages in an era of shrinking professional contact time.

scholarly journals Patient Safety Culture Assessment in Primary Care Settings in Greece

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 880
Author(s):  
Ioannis Antonakos ◽  
Kyriakos Souliotis ◽  
Theodora Psaltopoulou ◽  
Yannis Tountas ◽  
Maria Kantzanou
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Safety Culture ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Patient Safety Culture ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Survey Tool ◽  
Primary Care Settings

Introduction: A positive safety culture is considered a pillar of safety in health organizations and the first crucial step for quality health services. In this context, the aim of this study was to set a reference evaluation for the patient safety culture in the primary health sector in Greece, based on health professionals’ perceptions. Methods: We used a cross-sectional survey with a 62% response rate (n = 459), conducted in primary care settings in Greece (February to May 2020). We utilized the “Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture” survey tool from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The study participants were health professionals who interacted with patients from 12 primary care settings in Greece. Results: The most highly ranked domains were: “Teamwork” (82%), “Patient Care Tracking/Follow-up” (80% of positive scores), and “Organizational Learning” (80%); meanwhile, the lowest-ranked ones were: “Leadership Support for Patient Safety” (62%) and “Work Pressure and Pace” (46%). The other domains, such as “Overall Perceptions of Patient Safety and Quality” (77%), “Staff Training“ (70%), “Communication about Error” (70%), “Office Processes and Standardization” (67%), and “Communication Openness” (64%), ranked somewhere in between. Conclusions: A positive safety culture was identified in primary care settings in Greece, although weak areas concerning the safety culture should be addressed in order to improve patient safety.

scholarly journals ‘Just asking the question’: a qualitative study of health professionals’ experiences and perceptions of recording torture in vulnerable migrants in primary care settings

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. bjgp19X702929
Author(s):  
Gemma Whyatt ◽  
Max Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Political Factors ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Qualitative Research Study ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Targeted Screening ◽  
Survivors Of Torture

BackgroundA large proportion of vulnerable migrants may be survivors of torture, with complex health needs as a result; yet there is a lack of guidance or understanding of how to identify and record signs of torture. Clinical professionals in primary care are in a unique position to care for and support this patient population.AimThe primary aim of this study was to explore the primary care context of how signs of torture could be better recorded to support patients and meet their needs.MethodThis was a qualitative research study conducted through remote interviews with health professionals from a range of clinical backgrounds and experience of working with survivors of torture.ResultsTwelve health professionals participated in the study, with results analysed using applied thematic analysis. Seven themes were identified, ranging from the barriers to asking about and disclosing torture, the underlying purpose of doing so, political factors affecting this issue and various ways to potentially improve recording torture.ConclusionBefore clinical professionals can record torture, they must first ask the patient about it as survivors are unlikely to raise the topic themselves. Many clinical professionals lack the awareness or confidence to do this, thereby warranting further discussion on strategies to educate clinical professionals about torture. Accessible guidance and a simple, systematic method to identify survivors of torture which is suitable for a primary care setting is necessary, with suggestions for further research including routine enquiry and targeted screening.

scholarly journals Using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to investigate facilitators and barriers of implementing alcohol screening and brief intervention among primary care health professionals: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Shing-fong Chan ◽  
Yuan Fang ◽  
Martin Chi-sang Wong ◽  
Junjie Huang ◽  
Zixin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Brief Intervention ◽  
Implementation Research ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Alcohol Screening ◽  
Screening And Brief Intervention ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers ◽  
Inner Setting

Abstract Background Alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) is recommended to be implemented in primary care settings to intervene against hazardous/harmful drinking. However, studies showed that the uptake rate was low in many regions/countries. This systematic review presented current findings on the facilitators and barriers of SBI implemented by health professionals in primary care settings using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Methods We included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies identified through four electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Web of Science) from inception to June 2020. Included articles had to address barriers and facilitators of SBI implementation and provide sufficient details that the CFIR domains could be identified and data were abstracted using a standardized extraction form. Results A total of 74 studies published from 1985 to 2019 were finally analysed and summarized. The most common facilitators were knowledge and positive beliefs about SBI (characteristics of the individuals) and available resources (inner setting). In contrast, the most common barriers were cost related to implementing SBI (intervention characteristics), negative beliefs about SBI (characteristics of the individuals), and lack of self-efficacy in implementing SBI (characteristics of the individuals). It could be observed that factors related to the inner setting and characteristics of individuals were extensively studied whilst the process received the least attention. Conclusions Most of the facilitators and barriers are modifiable. Additionally, most literature focused on various kinds of available assets to implement SBI. To promote the spread of SBI implementation, more high-quality studies on the implementation process are needed. This systematic review could serve as a reference framework for health authorities to devise strategies for improving the implementation of SBI in primary care settings. Trial registration This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021258833).

Clinical Judgment and the Influence of Screening on Decision Making

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard N. Garb
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Mental Health Professionals ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Broad Array ◽  
Clinically Depressed

How do clinicians arrive at diagnostic decisions? In most cases the decision is not made following formal criteria, but by intuition. In addition, routine interviews are often narrow and the feedback gleaned from patients is inadequate. Yet it is not clear if screening helps or hinders clinical judgment. It might be that only clinicians who have low confidence and interviewing and diagnostic skills are open to the use of and actually helped by diagnostic tools. To provide a theoretical framework for understanding why it is difficult for physicians to detect depression in primary care settings, a broad array of research in the mental health fields can be described. For example, more than 1,000 studies have been conducted on clinical judgment in the area of mental health practice, and the results from these studies can be used to illuminate the challenges physicians face in judging whether a patient is clinically depressed and can benefit from treatment. In this chapter, results on clinical judgment will be described. A second topic will also be briefly discussed. Results from research on clinical judgment would seem to indicate that screening should be of value. Yet, as noted in Chapter 7, stand-alone screening programs have added little or nothing to outcomes. Reasons for this unexpected result will be explored. Three topics will be discussed: (1) narrowness of interviews, (2) nature of patient feedback, and (3) the cognitive processes of clinicians. Depression goes undetected because in many cases physicians do not ask patients if they have symptoms of a depressive mood disorder.3 To place this in context, it can be noted that mental health professionals also often do not ask patients about important symptoms and behaviors. Failure to inquire about depression in primary care settings can be viewed in the broader context of failure to inquire about important symptoms and events in mental health settings. Research on clinical judgment has demonstrated that lack of comprehensiveness is often a problem for interviews made in clinical practice. For example, in one study,4 mental health professionals saw patients in routine clinical practice, and afterwards research investigators conducted semi-structured interviews with the patients. Remarkably, the mental health professionals had evaluated only about 50% of the symptoms that were recorded using the semi-structured interviews.

scholarly journals Patients’ and health professionals’ perceptions of teamwork in primary care

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Pullon ◽  
Eileen McKinlay ◽  
Maria Stubbe ◽  
Lindsay Todd ◽  
Christopher Badenhorst
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Professional ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Qualitative Methodology ◽  
Team Leadership ◽  
Health Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Primary Care Settings

INTRODUCTION: Effective teamwork in primary care settings is integral to the ongoing health of those with chronic conditions. This study compares patient and health professional perceptions about teams, team membership, and team members’ roles. This study aimed to test both the feasibility of undertaking a collaborative method of enquiry as a means of investigating patient perceptions about teamwork in the context of their current health care, and also to compare and contrast these views with those of their usual health professionals in New Zealand suburban general practice settings. METHODS: Using a qualitative methodology, 10 in-depth interviews with eight informants at two practices were conducted and data analysed using inductive thematic analysis. FINDINGS: The methodology successfully elicited confidential interviews with both patients and the health professionals providing their care. Perceptions of the perceived value of team care and qualities facilitating good teamwork were largely concordant. Patient and health professionals differed in their knowledge and understanding about team roles and current chronic care programmes, and had differing perceptions about health care team leadership. CONCLUSION: This study supports the consensus that team-based care is essential for those with chronic conditions, but suggests important differences between patient and health professional views as to who should be in a health care team and what their respective roles might be in primary care settings. These differences are worthy of further exploration, as a lack of common understanding has the potential to consistently undermine otherwise well-intentioned efforts to achieve best possible health for patients with chronic conditions. KEYWORDS: Primary health care; chronic disease; physicians; nurses; patients; patient care team

scholarly journals Improving the Management of Late-Life Depression in Primary Care: Barriers and Facilitators

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara Sussman ◽  
Mark Yaffe ◽  
Jane McCusker ◽  
David Parry ◽  
Maida Sewitch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Family Physicians ◽  
Late Life ◽  
Late Life Depression ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Canadian Health ◽  
Mental Health Support ◽  
Health Support ◽  
Quantitative And Qualitative Methods

The objectives of this study were to elicit Canadian health professionals' views on the barriers to identifying and treating late-life depression in primary care settings and on the solutions felt to be most important and feasible to implement. A consensus development process was used to generate, rank, and discuss solutions. Twenty-three health professionals participated in the consensus process. Results were analysed using quantitative and qualitative methods. Participants generated 12 solutions. One solution, developing mechanisms to increase family physicians' awareness of resources, was highly ranked for importance and feasibility by most participants. Another solution, providing family physicians with direct mental health support, was highly ranked as important but not as feasible by most participants. Deliberations emphasized the importance of case specific, as needed support based on the principles of shared care. The results suggest that practitioners highly value collaborative care but question the feasibility of implementing these principles in current Canadian primary care contexts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document