The utility of CD200 expression and modified Matutes score in the diagnostic differentiation of mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia using flow cytometry

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Nicholas Myles ◽  
Pratyush Giri ◽  
Ivana Chim ◽  
Aruna Kodituwakku
2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S127-S127
Author(s):  
K M Erickson ◽  
D Lynch

Abstract Casestudy: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) accounts for about 30% of all lymphoid neoplasms and is the most common adult blood cancer in the Western world. Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) accounts for only about 6% of all B-cell lymphomas in Western countries. MCL and CLL are both CD5 positive B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. It is necessary to distinguish these two entities as MCL is a more aggressive disease, and requires specific treatment. MCL and CLL can occur in one patient at the same time and is often termed a composite lymphoma. We present an 84-year-old female with a history of endometrial cancer who was found to have splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy. Flow cytometry was performed upon her peripheral blood specimen which demonstrated two distinct populations of abnormal light chain restricted B-cell populations. One population demonstrated kappa light chain restriction and was positive for CD45, CD19, CD20, CD5, CD38, FMC-7, and CD22, representing MCL. The other population showed dim lambda light chain restriction that was also positive for CD45, CD19, dim CD20, CD5, and CD23, representing CLL. FISH studies demonstrated t(11;14), and four common deletions or chromosome aneuploidy associated with CLL. These findings confirmed the dual populations of CLL and MCL. This is an interesting case because it is a very rare combination with only a few cases having been reported with two distinct cell populations in one patient at the same time.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5637-5637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Spacek ◽  
Josef Karban ◽  
Martin Radek ◽  
Eva Babunkova ◽  
Jan Kvasnicka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in most patients is diagnosed with early stage disease identified incidentally on blood counts obtained for unrelated purposes. Immunophenotyping of peripheral blood (PB) is required for the diagnosis of CLL. A scoring system that helps in the differential diagnosis between CLL and other mature B-cell neoplasms (MBN) has been described twenty years ago (Matutes et al., Leukemia 1994; modified by Moreau et al., Am J Clin Pathol 1997). CLL/SLL typically demonstrates low-intensity staining for surface immunoglobulin, low or absent expression of CD22, CD79b and FMC7 and moderate to strong expression of CD5 and CD23. However, this phenotype is not entirely specific and some overlap in immunophenotype exists between CLL and non-CLL MBN. In particular, leukemic phase of CD5 positive mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) can be misdiagnosed as CLL. Recently, it has been shown that CD200 expression may help in differential diagnosis between CLL and other MBN. The present study aimed to prove CD200 usefulness in differentiating CLL from MCL on a series of consecutive patients and to investigate whether adding CD200 could improve the utility of Matutes scoring system, especially in atypical CLL. Methods Between January 2013 and March 2014, PB of consecutive patients with MBN was assessed in this study. Analysis was performed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) and samples were stained with panels of 4-color combinations of antibodies using a standard whole-blood assay. PB specimens were incubated with antibodies purchased from eBioscience (CD200 APC, clone OX-104), Immunotech (CD23, CD79b, FMC7), BD Biosciences (CD5, CD19), and DAKO (sIg). At least 5,000 B-cells were immediately acquired on flow cytometer. Diagnosis of CLL was made according to National Cancer Institute-Working Group criteria. Furthermore, tissue biopsies of 62 (31%) CLL cases were available for histological review, including all cases of atypical CLL. Diagnosis of MCL was based on morphology and immunohistochemical detection of cyclin D1 in tissue biopsies and further confirmed by detection of t(11;14) by FISH in selected cases. Results Table 1 provides details of the patient characteristics. In our series, CD200 was present on neoplastic B-cells of all 200 CLL cases (100%), whereas only 4 cases (8.7%) of MCL showed dim positivity of CD200. The remaining 42 cases (91.3%) of MCL were negative for CD200 expression. The revised Matutes score was calculated to classify CLL cases. All 179 cases of typical CLL (defined by a score ≥ 4) presented moderate to strong expression of CD200 (Median fluorescence intensity - MFI: median = 161). CD200 was also positive in all 21 cases of atypical CLL (defined by a score < 4), but showed lower intensity (MFI: median 128) than that observed in typical CLL (P = 0.02). Application of the Matutes scoring system to MCL cases showed that three cases scored 3 (6.5%), two cases scored 4 (4.3%) and none scored 5. Of note, CD200 was absent in two cases scoring 3 and was only dimly expressed in the remaining MCL cases scoring 3 or 4. Thus, the differential expression of CD200 in CLL and MCL retained even in those cases with otherwise indeterminate immunophenotype, therefore being particularly helpful for the distinction of atypical CLL and MCL. Conclusions Flow cytometry is an essential tool for the diagnosis of CLL. However, a significant immunophenotypic overlapping occurs especially between CLL and MCL cells. In this study, we investigated the expression of recently identified marker CD200 in PB of consecutive CLL and MCL patients. We have confirmed previous reports that CD200 is consistently expressed in all typical CLL. Furthermore, CD200 was expressed by all immunophenotypically atypical CLL cases. On the contrary, in MCL patients CD200 showed only a dim positivity in four subjects and was absent in the remaining 42. The inclusion of CD200 in the MBN routine flow cytometry panels facilitates the differential diagnosis between CLL and MCL and has a great impact on accurate diagnosis in cases with immunophenotypic aberrancies. This work was supported by grant RVO VFN64165 and PRVOUK P27/LF1/1 Table 1 MCL (46 pts.) CLL (200 pts.) Age (median, range) 66.7; 47.8-82.4 67.6; 32.2-90.7 Sex (F/M) 19/27 74/126 WBC x109/L (median, range) 10; 2.1-285.4 21.9; 2.8-375.2 % neoplastic B-cells of WBC (median, range) 17.1; 1.3-90.5 54; 1.7-94.7 CD200 MFI (median, range) 2.16; 1-53.2 147.5; 20.6-637 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4814-4814
Author(s):  
John Zhang ◽  
David Chin ◽  
Adam Anthony ◽  
Heather Bolton ◽  
Cheri Phillips ◽  
...  

Abstract The differential diagnoses of CD5 positive B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders mainly include chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and mantle cell lymphoma. Occasionally large cell and marginal zone lymphomas may also be CD5 positive. An accurate diagnosis effects patient management. The classical immunophenotype for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma is CD19/CD5/CD23 positive FMC-7 negative cells with dim CD20 and dim light chain expressions, while mantle cell lymphoma is CD19/CD5/FMC-7 positive with bright CD20 and bright light chain expressions. The diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma is usually confirmed by either immunostain for cyclin D1 or FISH study for t(11;14). In reality, immunostaining for cyclin D1 can be difficult and may show variable results in different laboratories and FISH study may not be readily available. Generally, when it comes to the diagnosis of lymphoma, immunohistochemical positivity of both CD5 and CD23 is almost pathognomic for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma if no fresh tissue is saved for flow cytometry analysis. Flow cytometry analysis of 44 FISH-confirmed mantle cell lymphomas was reviewed in our lab. Among these, 37 showed the classical immunophenotype of mantle cell lymphoma. However, 7 cases (16%) were positive for both CD5 and CD23. The expression of CD23 varied from dim to bright. When compared to typical CLL, they showed FMC-7 expression and brighter than dim light chain expression. In one case, the light chain expression was dim. In conclusion, CD23 expression which was thought to be a specific marker for CLL/SLL may also be seen with mantle cell lymphoma. Although FMC-7 expression is seen in all CD23 positive mantle cell lymphomas, bright light chain expression is not universal. We recommend that FISH or immunohistochemical studies for cyclin D1 be performed on CD5/CD19 clonal B cell proliferations with CD23 expression if morphology or immunophenotype is atypical for CLL/SLL.


2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S23-S23
Author(s):  
K M Erickson ◽  
D Lynch

Abstract Casestudy: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) accounts for about 30% of all lymphoid neoplasms and is the most common adult blood cancer in the Western world. Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) accounts for only about 6% of all B-cell lymphomas in Western countries. MCL and CLL are both CD5 positive B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. It is necessary to distinguish these two entities as MCL is a more aggressive disease, and requires specific treatment. MCL and CLL can occur in one patient at the same time and is often termed a composite lymphoma. We present an 84-year-old female with a history of endometrial cancer who was found to have splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy. Flow cytometry was performed upon her peripheral blood specimen which demonstrated two distinct populations of abnormal light chain restricted B-cell populations. One population demonstrated kappa light chain restriction and was positive for CD45, CD19, CD20, CD5, CD38, FMC-7, and CD22, representing MCL. The other population showed dim lambda light chain restriction that was also positive for CD45, CD19, dim CD20, CD5, and CD23, representing CLL. FISH studies demonstrated t(11;14), and four common deletions or chromosome aneuploidy associated with CLL. These findings confirmed the dual populations of CLL and MCL. This is an interesting case because it is a very rare combination with only a few cases having been reported with two distinct cell populations in one patient at the same time.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 958-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Proto-Siqueira ◽  
Lorena L. Figueredo-Pontes ◽  
Eduardo M. Rego ◽  
Edgar G. Rizzatti ◽  
Fabio M. Nascimento ◽  
...  

Abstract PRAME (Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma) gene is located on chromosome 22 (22q11.22) and is expressed at low levels by normal adrenal, ovarian and endometrial cells. In contrast, its expression has been demonstrated at high levels in several types of cancers, such as in acute myeloid and lymphoid leukemias and multiple myeloma . We recently have reported that PRAME is also expressed in lymphoproliferative diseases and its transcripts were detected in 26 out 58 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Nevertheless, the expression of PRAME protein in normal and neoplastic tissues is unknown. In order to address this question, we produced a monoclonal antibody against PRAME protein. A 562-nt fragment of the PRAME cDNA that includes the region that codes for the immunogenic 9-peptide was clone in pCR2.1-TOPO vector in DH5 alpha cells and subcloned into a pET24a expression vector, and the 196-amino acid peptide was expressed in BL21(DE3) cells as His-taged protein. The monoclonal antibody (MoAb) against PRAME was generated from splenocytes from mice immunized with the purified peptide. We then analyzed PRAME expression by flow cytometry in samples of peripheral blood (PB, n=15), bone marrow (BM, n=3) from healthy donors; in tonsils (n=3) from patients submitted to tonsilectomy for non malignant diseases and in PB samples from 26 CLL and 7 MCL patients. PRAME positive cells represented less than 15% of cells from normal PB, BM and tonsil cells. In contrast, 25 out of 26 CLL and 6 out of 7 MCL cases presented more than 20% of PRAME + cells [mean 59% (range:20–95%) and 75% (20–94%) for CLL and MCL, respectively]. The lymphoid cells from normal BM and tonsils that expressed PRAME were CD19+CD10+ CD27+ CD38± TdT− cIgM− CD5− suggesting that PRAME is expressed early during lymphoid ontogenesis and that its expression in CLL and MCL cells is aberrant. Furthermore, PRAME expression in normal lymphocytes was dimmer than in CLL and MCL cells. To quantify PRAME expression we evaluated PRAME Specific Antibody Binding Capacity (SABC) by a quantitative flow cytometry (QFC) method. The mean values of SABC were of 10,339 sites per cell (range 3,075 to 24,665) and of 14,191 sites per cell (range 5,059 to 20,679) for CLL and MCL, respectively. In contrast, in normal PB lymphocytes SABC values ranged from 1,628 to 1,781 sites per cell. Even in the two cases of CLL and MCL that had less than 20% PRAME+ cells, PRAME SABC was 3,075 and 12,347 sites per cell respectively, therefore significantly higher than the observed in normal PB lymphocytes. To evaluate the sensitivity of the QFC method, we established a cut off value for PRAME SABC based on the highest value detected in normal PB cells and then serially diluted tumor MCL cells marked with PRAME in normal PB lymphocytes. Based exclusively on PRAME expression, we were able to detected neoplastic MCL cells up to a 1:1000 dilution. In conclusion, PRAME protein is strongly expressed in the neoplastic clone in most patients with CLL and MCL. This finding supports the suggestion that this antigen may be further explored as a target for diagnostic, to detect minimal residual disease detection and for therapeutic approaches.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 91-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joana Perdigão ◽  
Helena Alaiz ◽  
Paulo Lúcio ◽  
Paula Gameiro ◽  
Marta Sebastião ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (21) ◽  
pp. 2283-2296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xose S. Puente ◽  
Pedro Jares ◽  
Elias Campo

Abstract Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are 2 well-defined entities that diverge in their basic pathogenic mechanisms and clinical evolution but they share epidemiological characteristics, cells of origin, molecular alterations, and clinical features that differ from other lymphoid neoplasms. CLL and MCL are classically considered indolent and aggressive neoplasms, respectively. However, the clinical evolution of both tumors is very heterogeneous, with subsets of patients having stable disease for a long time whereas others require immediate intervention. Both CLL and MCL include 2 major molecular subtypes that seem to derive from antigen-experienced CD5+ B cells that retain a naive or memory-like epigenetic signature and carry a variable load of immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region somatic mutations from truly unmutated to highly mutated, respectively. These 2 subtypes of tumors differ in their molecular pathways, genomic alterations, and clinical behavior, being more aggressive in naive-like than memory-like–derived tumors in both CLL and MCL. The pathogenesis of the 2 entities integrates the relevant influence of B-cell receptor signaling, tumor cell microenvironment interactions, genomic alterations, and epigenome modifications that configure the evolution of the tumors and offer new possibilities for therapeutic intervention. This review will focus on the similarities and differences of these 2 tumors based on recent studies that are enhancing the understanding of their pathogenesis and creating solid bases for new management strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document