Good statistical practice in utilizing real-world data in a comparative study for premarket evaluation of medical devices

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 580-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson Lu ◽  
Yunling Xu ◽  
Lilly Q. Yue
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. A501-A502 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Makady ◽  
R ten Ham ◽  
A de Boer ◽  
JL Hillege ◽  
O Klungel ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Makady ◽  
Ard van Veelen ◽  
Páll Jonsson ◽  
Owen Moseley ◽  
Anne D’Andon ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
pp. 87-88
Author(s):  
Benedetta Pongiglione ◽  
Aleksandra Torbica

IntroductionRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard in the hierarchy of research designs for evaluating the efficacy and safety of a treatment intervention. The low external validity of RCTs and the general shortage of clinical evidence available to support the use of many medical devices have emphasized the necessity for exploring the use of real-world data (RWD) as a complementary source to RCTs data for establishing a more robust evidence base on the effectiveness of medical devices. The aim of the present project is to assess in a comprehensive way the existing sources of real world data on medical devices in Europe.MethodsThe guidelines to the mapping exercise have been outlined in a research protocol. First, all national relevant sources (e.g. website of Ministry of Health, national institutions, research bodies) are screened, both in local language and English. Second, we perform a systematic search on PubMed using a set of key words for each case study, adapted to each country setting. Finally, we seek advice from key actors in the field of the device and clinical conditions, such as manufacturers or clinicians.ResultsInformation on existing sources of RWD for each case studies are provided in a template including details on the key features of the source (e.g. data producer, data collection period, sample size, study design, geographical coverage) and the main content of the dataset, distinguishing socio-demographic information, clinical and epidemiological data, data on resource use and health outcomes. The data mapping includes all countries of the project participants, i.e. Italy, UK, Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany, Hungary, and we enlarge the scope of our mapping including other countries: Spain, France, Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Poland and Hungary as well as international databases at pan-EU level. The number of available sources of RWD and their quality vary depending on case study and across countries. For example, in the case of orthopaedics, many countries have a national registry and administrative data, such as hospital discharge, contain useful information, although not as detailed. When a registry is not available, it is often the case that more observational studies are available; this occurs for example in France.ConclusionsIn this work we shows the importance of RWE and map in an accurate and comprehensive way which source of RWD are currently available and to what extent they are known and used in medical, epidemiological and economic research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 579-584
Author(s):  
Julie Polisena ◽  
Gayatri Jayaraman

AbstractIntroductionHealth Canada is committed to the modernization of the use of real-world data (RWD) and evidence (RWE) to support regulatory decisions. As such, telephone interviews with stakeholders, including government decision makers, health technology assessment (HTA) producers, industry, and patients, to understand their experiences with and perspectives on how to enhance RWE use for medical devices were performed.MethodsThirty-four semi-structured telephone interviews with forty key informants were conducted. Transcripts were reviewed independently by one individual to identify, define, and categorize key concepts and were verified by a second reviewer.Key FindingsThere are expectations for Health Canada to provide a framework and guidance on RWE use, identify relevant outcomes for data collection and criteria for data quality, conduct post-market surveillance more systematically, and partner with HTA organizations to develop methods for RWE generation. Stakeholders interviewed support the RWE use for regulatory decisions and HTA recommendations. Moreover, robust scientific methods for RWE generation will be critical to ensure that relevant questions are asked and rigorous statistical analyses are done to answer them. Patients are likely to consent to share their anonymized or de-identified medical information for nonprofit purposes.ConclusionsKey concepts from the interviews centered on the current and future RWE use for medical devices, considerations for the organizational, medical, scientific, and legal aspects and privacy issues of RWD collection or RWE generation, and options to implement the use of RWD and RWE. Our study findings will help inform the development of an RWE framework for regulatory decisions and HTA recommendations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 520-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Makady ◽  
Renske ten Ham ◽  
Anthonius de Boer ◽  
Hans Hillege ◽  
Olaf Klungel ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Benedetta Pongiglione ◽  
Aleksandra Torbica ◽  
Hedwig Blommestein ◽  
Saskia de Groot ◽  
Oriana Ciani ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim Technological and computational advancements offer new tools for the collection and analysis of real-world data (RWD). Considering the substantial effort and resources devoted to collecting RWD, a greater return would be achieved if real-world evidence (RWE) was effectively used to support Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and decision making on medical technologies. A useful question is: To what extent are RWD suitable for generating RWE? Methods We mapped existing RWD sources in Europe for three case studies: hip and knee arthroplasty, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and mitral valve repair (TMVR), and robotic surgery procedures. We provided a comprehensive assessment of their content and appropriateness for conducting the HTA of medical devices. The identification of RWD sources was performed combining a systematic search on PubMed with gray literature scoping, covering fifteen European countries. Results We identified seventy-one RWD sources on arthroplasties; ninety-five on TAVI and TMVR; and seventy-seven on robotic procedures. The number, content, and integrity of the sources varied dramatically across countries. Most sources included at least one health outcome (97.5%), with mortality and rehospitalization/reoperation the most common; 80% of sources included resource outcomes, with length of stay the most common, and comparators were available in almost 70% of sources. Conclusions RWD sources bear the potential for the HTA of medical devices. The main challenges are data accessibility, a lack of standardization of health and economic outcomes, and inadequate comparators. These findings are crucial to enabling the incorporation of RWD into decision making and represent a readily available tool for getting acquainted with existing information sources.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S833-S834
Author(s):  
R. Torres Torrejon ◽  
F. Janeke ◽  
R. Saunders

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S206
Author(s):  
E. Rizzo ◽  
G. Buseghin ◽  
T. Greco ◽  
J. Murphy ◽  
M. Pinciroli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document