Multilevel Analysis of the Relationship Between Type of Travel, Online Ratings, and Management Response: Empirical Evidence from International Upscale Hotels

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sai Liang ◽  
Markus Schuckert ◽  
Rob Law
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xunbing Shen

Microexpressions do exist, and they are regarded as valid cues to deception by many researchers, furthermore, there is a lot of empirical evidence which substantiates this claim. However, some researchers don’t think the microexpression can be a way to catch a liar. The author elucidates the theories predicting that looking for microexpressions can be a way to catch a liar, and notes that some data can support for the utilization of microexpressions as a good way to detect deception. In addition, the author thinks that the mixed results in the area of investigating microexpressions and deception detection may be moderated by the stake. More empirical studies which employ high-stake lies to explore the relationship between microexpressions and deception detection are needed.


Author(s):  
Armin Schnider

This chapter summarizes current interpretations of all forms of confabulations discussed in the book and reviews the relationship between the four forms of memory-related confabulations. Experimental investigation has confirmed the dissociation between various types of false memories and considerably advanced the understanding of the mechanisms of some forms of confabulation, in particular behaviourally spontaneous confabulation and false statements in anosognosia. Overall, experimental evidence is scarce; many models have no controlled experimental basis or extend their proposed range of application well beyond the empirical evidence. The chapter concludes with a call for heightened respect of basic scientific standards in the research on confabulation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1211-1226
Author(s):  
Phan Tran Minh Hung ◽  
Tran Thi Trang Dai ◽  
Phan Nguyen Bao Quynh ◽  
Le Duc Toan ◽  
Vo Hoang Diem Trinh

1980 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 406-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
James DeNardo

A heavy turnout is commonly believed to favor the Democrats. This study presents theoretical reasoning and empirical evidence that challenge the conventional view. Reasonable assumptions about the behavior of core and peripheral voters lead to the conclusion that the majority party is most likely to suffer when turnout increases, common sense notwithstanding. It also appears that the recent decay of partisan loyalties among voters has eroded the relationship between turnout and the vote.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document