Prognostic value of pre-treatment red blood cell distribution width in lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Biomarkers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Wang ◽  
Yaojie Zhou ◽  
Kun Zhou ◽  
Jue Li ◽  
Guowei Che
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 773-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariusz Łochowski ◽  
Justyna Chałubińska-Fendler ◽  
Barbara Łochowska ◽  
Izabela Zawadzka ◽  
Daniel Brzeziński ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 286
Author(s):  
Angelo Zinellu ◽  
Arduino A. Mangoni

The identification of biomarkers predicting disease severity and outcomes is the focus of intense research in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 infection). Ideally, such biomarkers should be easily derivable from routine tests. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the predictive role of the red blood cell distribution width (RDW), a routine hematological test, in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We searched the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus, from January 2020 to November 2020, for studies reporting data on the RDW and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity, defined as severe illness or admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality. Eleven studies in 4901 COVID-19 patients were selected for the meta-analysis. Pooled results showed that the RDW values were significantly higher in patients with severe disease and non-survivors (standard mean difference, SMD = 0.56, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.81, p < 0.001). Heterogeneity between studies was extreme (I2 = 80.6%; p < 0.001). In sensitivity analysis, the effect size was not modified when each study was in turn removed (effect size range, between 0.47 and 0.63). The Begg’s (p = 0.53) and Egger’s tests (p = 0.52) showed no evidence of publication bias. No significant correlations were observed between SMD and age, gender, whole blood count, end point, study geographic area, or design. Our meta-analysis showed that higher RDW values are significantly associated with COVID-19 severity and mortality. This routine parameter might assist with early risk stratification in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.


2018 ◽  
Vol 481 ◽  
pp. 34-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Di Zhou ◽  
Peipei Xu ◽  
Miaoxin Peng ◽  
Xiaoyan Shao ◽  
Miao Wang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Seyed Hossein Aalaei-Andabili ◽  
R. David Anderson ◽  
Anthony A. Bavry ◽  
Brian Barr ◽  
George J. Arnaoutakis ◽  
...  

Objective Elevated red blood cell distribution width (RDW) level has been shown to be associated with poor outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. Limited data are available regarding the prognostic value of RDW in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of RDW variation on outcomes of TAVR patients. Methods From March 20, 2012, to February 20, 2020, the pre-TAVR RDW levels of 1,163 consecutive TAVR patients were examined. Receiver operating curves were set to define the most accurate cut-point, which was subsequently validated in our validation set. Associations of RDW levels with early and long-term outcomes were investigated. Results A total of 988 patients were eligible for the analysis. Patients with 30-day, 1-year, and 7-year mortality had significantly higher pre-TAVR RDW levels (15.8% [12.9-19.1] vs 14.7% [11.6-26.3], P = 0.01; 16% [12.3-26.3] vs 14.7% [11.6-24.3], P < 0.001; 15.6% [12.3-26.3] vs 14.6% [11.6-24.3], P < 0.001, respectively). A RDW of 14.5% was found as the most sensitive and specific cut-point for mortality at 1 and 7 years (HR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.6-4.2, P < 0.001; HR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.3-2.4, P < 0.001), with mortality of 22% versus 10% at 1 year ( P < 0.001) and 37% versus 27% at 7 years ( P < 0.001) in patients with RDW ≥14.5% versus those with RDW <14.5%. Conclusions RDW is an important prognostic factor in TAVR patients. A RDW level higher than 14.5% is significantly associated with post-TAVR early and late mortality. RDW levels should be incorporated into current risk assessment models as an additional variable to predict post-TAVR outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 2513-2522
Author(s):  
Jane J. Lee ◽  
Sahar M. Montazerin ◽  
Adeel Jamil ◽  
Umer Jamil ◽  
Jolanta Marszalek ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document