Binge eating and binge drinking behaviors: the role of family functioning

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Fiorenzo Laghi ◽  
Dora Bianchi ◽  
Sara Pompili ◽  
Antonia Lonigro ◽  
Roberto Baiocco
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 413-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lies Depestele ◽  
Laurence Claes ◽  
Eva Dierckx ◽  
Imke Baetens ◽  
Katrien Schoevaerts ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1505-1516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Pompili ◽  
Fiorenzo Laghi

This study aimed to investigate the motivations underlying binge eating and binge drinking in a sample of 302 adolescents. Our findings showed that binge eating was significantly correlated with gender, environmental, emotional, and social eating. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis indicated that emotional and environmental eating were significant positive predictors of binge eating, whereas binge drinking was significantly correlated with enhancement, social, and coping motives. Only enhancement motives were significant predictors of binge drinking. Our results support the argument that the reasons underlying binge eating and binge drinking in adolescents may be similar and may perform the same function.


2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiorenzo Laghi ◽  
Roberto Baiocco ◽  
Francesca Liga ◽  
Antonia Lonigro ◽  
Emma Baumgartner

1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Harway ◽  
◽  
Nancy Boyd-Franklin ◽  
Robert Geffner ◽  
Marsali Hansen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A Griffin ◽  
Timothy J Trull

Objectives: Using Ecological Momentary Assessment methods (EMA) we aimed to investigate the influence of trait and state (momentary) impulsivity on alcohol use behaviors in daily life. Facets of the UPPS trait model of impulsivity (Whiteside and Lynam, 2001) have been found to differentially relate to alcohol-related outcomes and behaviors in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. The present work expands on this by assessing UPPS facets in daily life and examining the contributions of trait and state impulsivity facets to daily life drinking behavior. Methods: 49 participants were prompted at least six times per day for 21 days. A total of 4,548 collected EMA reports were included in analyses. Multi-level models were computed predicting daily life alcohol use behaviors from state and trait impulsivity facets and relevant covariates. Results: Individual facets of momentary impulsivity differentially related to alcohol outcomes, such that (lack of) premeditation and, to a lesser extent, sensation seeking showed unique patterns of association with drinking and drinking quantity. Only trait levels of (lack of) premeditation were related to drinking behavior in daily life; no other trait UPPS scale significantly related to alcohol use. Conclusions: These results highlight state difficulties with premeditation as particularly relevant to drinking behavior in daily life. Our results also support the incremental validity of state impulsivity facets over trait level measures in relation to drinking behavior in daily life. These findings offer important insight into the phenomenology of daily-life alcohol use and highlight possible avenues for intervention and prevention efforts. Public Health Statement: Momentary fluctuations in premeditation predict alcohol use in daily life. Treatments targeting planning or forethought in relation to alcohol use may interrupt this process contributing to daily life drinking behaviors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document