Reproductive period and cognitive function in a representative sample of naturally postmenopausal women aged 60–64 years

Climacteric ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 380-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. -F. Low ◽  
K. J. Anstey ◽  
A. F. Jorm ◽  
B. Rodgers ◽  
H. Christensen
Author(s):  
Hung-Tse Chou ◽  
Pei-Yu Wu ◽  
Jiun-Chi Huang ◽  
Szu-Chia Chen ◽  
Wan-Yi Ho

Female sex hormones such as estrogen and progesterone play an important role in the regulation of a woman’s body, including cognition and neurogenesis. However, the effects of age at menarche and reproductive period on cognitive function are still controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between age at menarche and reproductive period with cognitive impairment. Data were obtained from the Taiwan Biobank. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and its five subdomains. Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that an old age at menarche (per one year; coefficient β, −0.189; p = 0.020) was significantly associated with a low total MMSE score, whereas reproductive period (p = 0.733) was not significantly associated with total MMSE score. Furthermore, an old age at menarche was significantly associated with low MMSE G2 (registration) (per one year; coefficient β, −0.022; p = 0.035) and G5 (language, construction and obey) scores (per one year; coefficient β, −0.054; p = 0.047). However, age at menarche was not significantly associated with MMSE G1 (orientation), G3 (attention and calculation) and G4 (recall) scores. In addition, reproductive period was not significantly associated with any MMSE subscores. Late menarche was associated with poor cognitive function, including low total MMSE score and low MMSE G2 and G5 scores. However, reproductive period was not associated with cognitive function in postmenopausal women.


2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ljiljana Kocoska-Maras ◽  
Angelique Flöter Rådestad ◽  
Kjell Carlström ◽  
Torbjörn Bäckström ◽  
Bo von Schoultz ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (31) ◽  
pp. 5144-5152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudine Legault ◽  
Pauline M. Maki ◽  
Susan M. Resnick ◽  
Laura Coker ◽  
Patricia Hogan ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare the effects of two selective estrogen receptor modulators, tamoxifen and raloxifene, on global and domain-specific cognitive function. Patients and Methods The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project's Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) study was a randomized clinical trial of tamoxifen 20 mg/d or raloxifene 60 mg/d in healthy postmenopausal women at increased risk of breast cancer. The 1,498 women who were randomly assigned in STAR were age 65 years and older, were not diagnosed with dementia, and were enrolled onto the Cognition in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (Co-STAR) trial, beginning 18 months after STAR enrollment started. A cognitive test battery modeled after the one used in the Women's Health Initiative Study of Cognitive Aging (WHISCA) was administered. Technicians were centrally trained to administer the battery and recertified every 6 months. Analyses were conducted on all participants and on 273 women who completed the first cognitive battery before they started taking their medications. Results Overall, there were no significant differences in adjusted mean cognitive scores between the two treatment groups across visits. There were significant time effects across the three visits for some of the cognitive measures. Similar results were obtained for the subset of women with true baseline measures. Conclusion Tamoxifen and raloxifene are associated with similar patterns of cognitive function in postmenopausal women at increased risk of breast cancer. Future comparisons between these findings and patterns of cognitive function in hormone therapy and placebo groups in WHISCA should provide additional insights into the effects of tamoxifen and raloxifene on cognitive function in older women.


1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 322-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Gull ◽  
B. Karlsson ◽  
I. Milsom ◽  
M. Wikland ◽  
S. Granberg

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 697-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Geller ◽  
Andrea K. Crane ◽  
Ellen C. Wells ◽  
Barbara L. Robinson ◽  
Mary L. Jannelli ◽  
...  

The Breast ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 388-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly-Anne Phillips ◽  
Karin Ribi ◽  
Zhuoxin Sun ◽  
Alisa Stephens ◽  
Alastair Thompson ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 1224-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariusz Gujski ◽  
Jarosław Pinkas ◽  
Anna Wierzbińska-Stępniak ◽  
Alfred Owoc ◽  
Iwona Bojar

2001 ◽  
Vol 344 (16) ◽  
pp. 1207-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristine Yaffe ◽  
Kathyrn Krueger ◽  
Somnath Sarkar ◽  
Deborah Grady ◽  
Elizabeth Barrett-Connor ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document