A review of factors that moderate autobiographical memory performance in patients with major depressive disorder

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1122-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. King ◽  
Arlene G. MacDougall ◽  
Shelley M. Ferris ◽  
Brian Levine ◽  
Glenda M. MacQueen ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Anastasia Pavlidou ◽  
Petra V. Viher ◽  
Hanta Bachofner ◽  
Florian Weiss ◽  
Katharina Stegmayer ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 774-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Griffith ◽  
Stephan Claes ◽  
Titia Hompes ◽  
Elske Vrieze ◽  
Stefanie Vermote ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin Hitchcock ◽  
Catrin Rees ◽  
Evangeline Rodrigues ◽  
Siobhan Gormley ◽  
Barbara Dritschel ◽  
...  

Impaired retrieval of specific, autobiographical memories of personally experienced events is a key characteristic of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, there are findings in subclinical samples which suggest that the reduced specificity phenomenon may be a reflection of a broader impairment in the deliberate retrieval of all autobiographical memory types. This experiment explored this possibility by requiring individuals with MDD (N=68) to complete a cued-recall task which required retrieval of specific memories to a block of cues, retrieval of categoric, general memories to a block of cues, and to alternate between retrieval of specific and general memories for a block of cues. Results demonstrated that relative to never-depressed controls, individuals with MDD experience reduced recall of both specific, single incident memories (d=0.48) and general memories (d=1.00), along with reduced flexibility in alternating between specific and general memories (d=0.90), a skill vital to restraining negative beliefs. Findings indicate that the flexibility of autobiographical retrieval is important for mental health and support further development of autobiographical memory-based interventions which target a range of retrieval deficits.


2016 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 72-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katelynn Champagne ◽  
Katie L. Burkhouse ◽  
Mary L. Woody ◽  
Cope Feurer ◽  
Effua Sosoo ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia A. Rao ◽  
Lisanne M. Jenkins ◽  
Erica Hymen ◽  
Maia Feigon ◽  
Sara L. Weisenbach ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectives: There is a well-known association between memory impairment and major depressive disorder (MDD). Additionally, recent studies are also showing resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsMRI) abnormalities in active and remitted MDD. However, no studies to date have examined both rs connectivity and memory performance in early course remitted MDD, nor the relationship between connectivity and semantically cued episodic memory. Methods: The rsMRI data from two 3.0 Tesla GE scanners were collected from 34 unmedicated young adults with remitted MDD (rMDD) and 23 healthy controls (HCs) between 18 and 23 years of age using bilateral seeds in the hippocampus. Participants also completed a semantically cued list-learning test, and their performance was correlated with hippocampal seed-based rsMRI. Regression models were also used to predict connectivity patterns from memory performance. Results: After correcting for sex, rMDD subjects performed worse than HCs on the total number of words recalled and recognized. rMDD demonstrated significant in-network hypoactivation between the hippocampus and multiple fronto-temporal regions, and multiple extra-network hyperconnectivities between the hippocampus and fronto-parietal regions when compared to HCs. Memory performance negatively predicted connectivity in HCs and positively predicted connectivity in rMDD. Conclusions Even when individuals with a history of MDD are no longer displaying active depressive symptoms, they continue to demonstrate worse memory performance, disruptions in hippocampal connectivity, and a differential relationship between episodic memory and hippocampal connectivity. (JINS, 2016, 22, 225–239)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document