scholarly journals Environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 386-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lambert Schneider ◽  
Stephanie La Hoz Theuer
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Young Moon ◽  
Jione Jung ◽  
Jihei Song ◽  
Sung Hee Lee

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-160
Author(s):  
Charlotte Streck ◽  
Moritz von Unger ◽  
Sandra Greiner

The 25th session of the Conference of the Parties (cop-25) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (unfccc) became the longest cop on record – but yielded few results. It appears that four years after the adoption of the Paris Agreement, enthusiasm has waned and political bargaining and bean-counting have taken over. Countries, for even the slightest chance to keep temperatures ‘well below’ 2 degrees Celsius, must do much more than they have previously committed to and accelerate the shift towards a zero-carbon economy. However, the conference largely failed to heed the rallying cry of the Chilean presidency. The flagship decisions (grouped under the banner “Chile-Madrid Time for Action”) neither produced new commitments – enhancing ambition or finance for developing countries – nor new rules that would nudge countries closer to the climate action targets needed. The leftover pieces from last year’s negotiations of the “Paris Rulebook” were also not resolved, in particular the unfinished decisions on Article 6 on market- and non-market mechanisms. The procrastination shows that the new architecture of the Paris Agreement, while addressing several of the shortcomings of the Kyoto Protocol, suffers from its own weaknesses. The meager results of Madrid give reason to pause and reflect on the conditions that may hold countries back from fully embracing the Paris Agreement, but also to consider the future and nature of carbon markets and what is making the issue so difficult to resolve.


Energy Policy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 397-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thais Diniz Oliveira ◽  
Angelo Costa Gurgel ◽  
Steve Tonry

Energy Policy ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 413-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Warnecke ◽  
Sina Wartmann ◽  
Niklas Höhne ◽  
Kornelis Blok

Climate Law ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 142-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torbjørg Jevnaker ◽  
Jørgen Wettestad

Does the Paris Agreement provide a boost to carbon markets? Although carbon markets are spreading globally, so far relatively few links have been established between them. The history of linking indicates that successful efforts are characterized by converging ets design, and, related to this, political will. Moreover, existing links have been facilitated by prior economic and political ties. Such linking processes face significant challenges related to distribution of power and political feasibility. The Paris Agreement does not make the more intrinsic challenges of political linking go away. Moreover, a significant amount of elaboration and clarification of the Paris Agreement remains subject to further negotiations. Nevertheless, Paris confirmed an increasing support for carbon markets: the periodic reviews of state climate policies, shared fulfilment, and common guidance for accounting, together provide a new momentum for the development of carbon markets and the process of linking them. What this boost means for the prospects of a globally interlinked carbon market remains to be seen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document