Psychoanalysis in medicine: applying psychoanalytic thought to contemporary medicine

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Tim Fox
1990 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1064-1064
Author(s):  
Seymour Sarason

Author(s):  
Mohammad Ayaz Niazi

This scholarly article discusses the view of Islamic Sharia law pertaining to artificial insemination. Artificial insemination, as one of the contemporary medical issues, was not in existence in the era of Sharia jurisprudents. It emerged in the last century as a result of scientific and medical developments; as its first successful experience in the field was performed in the UK in 1977 on the birth of a baby girl called Louise Brown. The practice later proliferated in other western countries, even surpassing its legitimate aim of treating infertile couples, as it began to entail businesses such as womb comodification, the establishment of sperm banks, and the like.


Author(s):  
J. Donald Boudreau ◽  
Eric J. Cassell ◽  
Abraham Fuks

A truly person-centered curriculum requires important changes to how the clinical method is taught. Medical interviewing demands explicit instruction in how the spoken language works and specific strategies that elevate the status of attentive listening so that this aspect is seen as important as the more mechanical aspects of traditional communication skills training. The term chief complaint is declared outdated and suggestions for its replacement are offered. The medical record is considered an important educational instrument, and recommendations are made so that it is in service of functional assessment and better aligned to a person-centered approach. Modifications to the physical examination, particularly a renewed emphasis on clinical observation, are outlined. The chapter concludes with a discussion of clinical thinking and judgment. A plea is made for inculcating a receptiveness toward a narrative competence within medicine.


Author(s):  
J. Donald Boudreau ◽  
Eric J. Cassell ◽  
Abraham Fuks

The clinical method is defined as the means by which doctors gather information about their patients, think about and evaluate these medical facts, and enter the facts into their process of care. Its key components are the medical history, including the process by which it is acquired from patients and its subsequent documentation in the medical record, as well as the physical examination. Characteristics, such as the reproducibility and accuracy of various components, are discussed with a reference to prevailing opinions of subjectivity and objectivity in medicine. It is argued that as a consequence of a shift in the prevalence of illness, from acute to chronic conditions, a misalignment exists between the clinical method currently taught and contemporary medicine. It is suggested that a renewed and repurposed clinical method must incorporate enhanced strategies for functional assessments.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-114
Author(s):  
Jerry Avorn

The article from the Vermont-Oxford Neonatal Network1 in this issue of Pediatrics comparing two surfactant preparations represents an important case study of a central issue in contemporary medicine: the need for rigorous, even-handed evaluation of competing therapies. Even at a time in which patients and payers are expecting ever-higher standards for clinical outcomes, and policymakers and insurers are demanding more and more stringent cost containment, the American health care system lacks a coherent mechanism for assembling and analyzing the data needed to meet these goals. For pharmacologic therapies, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prefers that mew agents be tested against placebos whenever possible, unless this would result in harm to experimental subjects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document