Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (15) ◽  
pp. 2601-2607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Malakian ◽  
Shiva Bashirnezhadkhabaz ◽  
Mohammad-Reza Aramesh ◽  
Masoud Dehdashtian
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory

Frühgeborene: Nasale Hochfrequenz-Oszillationsbeatmung vs. nasaler CPAP

2021 ◽  
Vol 225 (05) ◽  
pp. 389-390
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory

Viele Frühgeborene mit einem Atemnotsyndrom (engl. Respiratory Distress Syndrome, RDS) erhalten zunächst eine nicht invasive Atemunterstützung. Ein chinesisches Forscherteam untersuchte nun, welche Methode besser vor einem invasiven mechanischen Beatmungsbedarf schützte: Der nasale CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) oder die nasale HFOV (High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document