Effect of analgesia with pethidine during labour on false positivity of newborn hearing screening test

Author(s):  
Pinar Kadirogullari ◽  
Pinar Yalcin Bahat ◽  
Emine Karabuk ◽  
Kubra Bagci Cakmak ◽  
Kerem Doga Seckin
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Inken Brockow ◽  
Kristina Söhl ◽  
Uta Nennstiel

Since the 1 January, 2009, newborn hearing screening (NHS) has been obligatory for every child in Germany. NHS is part of the Pediatrics Directive of the Federal Joint Committee. In this directive, details of the procedures and screening quality to be achieved are given. We evaluate if these quality criteria were met in Bavaria in 2016. The NHS data of children born in 2016 in Bavaria were evaluated for quality criteria, such as screening coverage in screening facilities, screening methods, referral rate (rate of failed tests at discharge) and a child’s age at the diagnosis of a hearing disorder. NHS was documented for 116,776 children born in Bavaria in 2016. In the first step, 78,904 newborns were screened with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and 37,865 with automated auditory brainstem response. Of these, 9182 (7.8%) failed the first test in one or both ears. A second screening before discharge was performed on 53.3% of the newborns with a refer result in the first test, out of which 58.7% received a pass result. After the screening process, 4.6% of the newborns were discharged with a refer result. Only 18% of the first controls after discharge were performed by a pediatric audiologist. In 37.9% of the newborns, the screening center intervened to assure the control of any failed screening test. The median age of diagnosis for bilateral hearing loss was 5.3 months. In Bavaria, NHS was implemented successfully. A tracking system for all children who failed the hearing screening test is pivotal for early diagnosis and therapy of children with hearing deficiency.


2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Crockett ◽  
Holly Baker ◽  
Kai Uus ◽  
John Bamford ◽  
Theresa M Marteau

Background: Newborn hearing screening is currently replacing the health visitor distraction test (HVDT) conducted at eight months. Our previous research indicates that recall for further tests following newborn hearing screening can have a negative impact on the emotional well being of mothers, but it is not known if this is greater than that caused by recall following the distraction test. Objective: To compare the impact on maternal anxiety and satisfaction of recall following newborn hearing screening and the HVDT. Methods: Four groups participated: 27 mothers of babies receiving a satisfactory result and 21 mothers of babies recalled after the HVDT 26 mothers of babies receiving a satisfactory result and 16 mothers of babies recalled after newborn hearing screening. Questionnaires assessing maternal anxiety, worry and certainty about the babies' hearing, satisfaction with and attitudes towards the screening test were sent to mothers three weeks and six months following screening. Results: Comparison of the effects of receipt of different results showed no significant differences in maternal anxiety, worry and certainty between the two tests. Those mothers whose babies had a newborn hearing screening test were significantly more satisfied, regardless of the result received. Those who received a satisfactory result on the newborn hearing screening programme also had more positive attitudes towards that screening test than those receiving a satisfactory result following the HVDT. Conclusion: These results suggest that newborn hearing screening does not have a more negative emotional impact than the HVDT.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-124
Author(s):  
Liezel Lorraine B. Olivo ◽  
Xerxes G. Malaga

The newborn hearing screening test is implemented before hospital discharge to initiate early identification and treatment. With a large population, lack of education, fewer professionals, and limited access to facilities, the targeted hearing screening program is implemented only to high-risk infants. The success in mandating Republic Act No. 9709, also known as the Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention Act of 2009, was enacted for the prevention, early diagnosis, and intervention of hearing loss. Healthcare professionals do not feel adequately updated with newborn hearing screening and documenting screening results. Hence, this paper describes the level of knowledge of nurses in performing newborn hearing screening tests. Likewise, it determines the difference existing between nurses' demographics and their level of knowledge. Also, it identifies nurses' level of knowledge based on areas of procedures, standards, and protocols of newborn hearing screening tests and challenges and best practices encountered.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-96
Author(s):  
Yurdaer Baydar ◽  
Ercan Pınar ◽  
Hüseyin Katılmış ◽  
Fatih Kemal Soy ◽  
Canay Çamlı

Author(s):  
Ayşe Çakal ◽  
Zerrin Aşcı ◽  
Abdulkadir Bucak ◽  
Beyhan Yılmaz ◽  
Emel Aytuğ

2011 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleina Mijares Nodarse ◽  
Didiesle Herrera Alonso ◽  
José Gaya Vázquez ◽  
Elsa Santos Febles ◽  
María Cecilia Pérez Abalo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document