Evaluation of an action learning programme for leadership development of SME leaders in the UK

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Anne Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Leadership Development ◽  
Action Learning ◽  
The Uk

Opportunities and challenges of using an action learning set to enhance leadership development: a pilot evaluative study

Physiotherapy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. e8
Author(s):  
R. Garrod ◽  
S. Harding ◽  
J. Head ◽  
A. Jepson ◽  
K. Minowa-Astridge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Leadership Development ◽  
Action Learning ◽  
Evaluative Study ◽  
Learning Set

Beyond healthcare leadership? The imperative for health and social care systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-363
Author(s):  
John Duncan Edmonstone
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Leadership Development ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Healthcare Leadership ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
The Future ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
The Uk

Purpose This paper aims to make the case that there is a need to move beyond a focus on an approach to leadership development which is confined to health care only. It argues that, given the economic, financial, social and organisational context within which health and social care organisations in the UK operate, there is a need to develop leadership within health and social care systems, rather than within the existing “siloed” sectors. Design/methodology/approach The paper considers the context within which health and social care organisations in the UK operate; examines the nature of those organisations; makes the case for focusing on the health and social car system through systems leadership; and identifies the need for leadership, rather than leader development. Findings There is a danger of health and social care organisations “walking backwards into the future” with eyes fixed on the past. The future lies with treating health and social care as a system, rather than focusing on organisations. The current model is individual leader focused, but the emerging model is one of collective multi-agency teams. Originality/value The paper seeks to go beyond a health-care-only focus, by asserting that there is a need to regard health and social care as a single system, delivered by a multiplicity of different organisations. This has implications for the kind of leadership involved and for how this might be developed.

scholarly journals Leadership development in SMEs: an action learning approach

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire M. Leitch ◽  
Christel McMullan ◽  
Richard T. Harrison
Keyword(s):  
Leadership Development ◽  
Action Learning ◽  
Learning Approach

scholarly journals Academic leadership development programs: a model for sustained institutional change

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1008-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ortrun Zuber-Skerritt ◽  
Ina Louw
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Leadership Development ◽  
Institutional Change ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Academic Staff ◽  
Action Learning ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Multiplier Effect

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate a leadership development program (LDP) for senior academic staff on “qualitative research” after two years to establish the success, limitations and overall impact of the program in terms of personal, professional and organizational benefits. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents the background, outline of the LDP and evaluation of results through participant feedback: at the end of the program; and after two years, using a “participatory action learning and action research” (PALAR) approach. Findings – All participants were very positive about the design, conduct and learning outcomes of the program in terms of their own and their students’ learning during and after the program. But although the workshop had prepared them, some had not cascaded their learning and skills by conducting similar programs in their department, faculty or university wide, which was one of the main original objectives to achieve a multiplier effect across the institution. The authors discuss various reasons for this shortcoming and develop a process model for positive institutional change management in higher education. Research limitations/implications – Medium- and long-term effects of an LDP need to be followed up after a timespan of one to three or five years to establish whether the development has been effective and sustainable and to learn from limitations and shortcomings for future R&D activities. Practical implications – The authors identify the limitations and suggest practical institutional changes that encourage cascading of learning in theory and practice with a multiplier effect. Social implications – The paper aims to assist higher education institutions to ensure sustainability in their LDPs. Originality/value – The process model for leadership development in higher education can be adopted, adapted or further developed by other scholars interested in designing, conducting and evaluating a sustainable LDP in their field and organization.

scholarly journals Action learning: ripples within and beyond the set

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert James Warwick ◽  
Adam Palmer ◽  
Janet McCray
Keyword(s):  
Leadership Development ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Action Learning ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Practical Action ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
Single Person ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This paper aims to explore the impact of action learning (AL) on an individual and an organisation, particularly the process by which each affected the other. The organisation is a UK National Health Service (NHS) Trust that includes two hospitals. Design/methodology/approach This is a single person case study involving a clinician, but the voice of an author can also be heard. It involves the experience of the individual as they experience AL as part of a leadership development programme leading to a postgraduate certificate. The authors explain their caution of the case study approach and in doing so offer their thoughts in how this paper could be read and impact on practice. Findings The authors show a process whereby an AL set participant moves from being confident about their project to one of uncertainty as the impact of the project ripples throughout the organisation. Through this process of unsettlement, the individual’s unnoticed assumptions are explored in ways that enable practical action to be taken. In doing so, the individual’s leadership and identity developed. Research limitations/implications This is a single person case study in one organisation, thus affecting wider generalisation. Originality/value This single case study contributes to the debate on critical AL and the use of AL in the NHS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document