scholarly journals Thermophysiological responses to capacitive resistive monopolar radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint: A randomised controlled experimental study

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Binoy Kumaran ◽  
Tim Watson
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Electromagnetic Radiation ◽  
Osteoarthritis Of The Knee ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation

scholarly journals Evaluation and Validation of a Joint Stress Test to Induce Activity-Related Knee Joint Discomfort — a Prospective Case-Control Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane Schön ◽  
Claudia Reule ◽  
Katharina Knaub ◽  
Antje Micka ◽  
Manfred Wilhelm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Osteoarthritis Of The Knee ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Short Time Interval ◽  
Joint Stress ◽  
Joint Health ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Health Function

Abstract Background The assessment of improvement or maintenance of joint health in healthy subjects is a great challenge. The aim of the study was the evaluation of a joint stress test to assess joint discomfort in subjects with activity-related knee joint discomfort (ArJD). Results Forty-five subjects were recruited to perform the single-leg-step-down (SLSD) test (15 subjects per group). Subjects with ArJD of the knee (age 22–62 years) were compared to healthy subjects (age 24–59 years) with no knee joint discomfort during daily life sporting activity and to subjects with mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis of the knee joint (OA, Kellgren score 2–3, age 42–64 years). The subjects performed the SLSD test with two different protocols: (I) standardization for knee joint discomfort; (II) standardization for load on the knee joint. In addition, range of motion (ROM), reach test, acute pain at rest and after a single-leg squat and knee injury, and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) were assessed. In OA and ArJD subjects, knee joint discomfort could be reproducibly induced in a short time interval of less than 10 min (200 steps). In healthy subjects, no pain was recorded. A clear differentiation between study groups was observed with the SLSD test (maximal step number) as well as KOOS questionnaire, ROM, and reach test. In addition, a moderate to good intra-class correlation was shown for the investigated outcomes. Conclusions These results suggest the SLSD test is a reliable tool for the assessment of knee joint health function in ArJD and OA subjects to study the improvements in their activities. Further, this model can be used as a stress model in intervention studies to study the impact of stress on knee joint health function.

Predictors of response to intra-articular steroid injections in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 2541-2547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nibah Fatimah ◽  
Babur Salim ◽  
Ejaz-ul-Haq Raja ◽  
Amjad Nasim
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Osteoarthritis Of The Knee ◽  
Steroid Injections ◽  
Predictors Of Response

scholarly journals Experience of Domed High Tibial Osteotomy in Osteoarthritis of the Knee joint

1983 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 768-773
Author(s):  
M. Oryoji ◽  
Y. Takeda ◽  
M. Kijima ◽  
K. Yoshinaga ◽  
K. Tomari
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
High Tibial Osteotomy ◽  
Osteoarthritis Of The Knee ◽  
Tibial Osteotomy

scholarly journals Hope, Hype, Hurdles & Future Perspective for PRP, PRP versus Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Osteoarthritis of Knee: A Review Article.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. e1-e12
Author(s):  
Ashok Kumar ◽  
Anikait Ghosh Kadamb ◽  
Krish Ghosh Kadamb
Keyword(s):  
Hyaluronic Acid ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Future Perspective ◽  
Osteoarthritis Of The Knee ◽  
Stiff Knee ◽  
Injection Interval ◽  
One Year

BackgroundComparative studies of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid show variable results. PurposeA review was conducted to understand the current role of PRP and its efficacy versus hyaluronic acid in osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint. MethodsOut of 170 identified studies, 14 studies involving 1575 patients with 637 males and 938 females were selected based on PRISMA flow chart guidelines and were analyzed for the study. ResultsA standard PRP regimen consisting of 2–3 intra-articular injections (IA) of 4–6 mL of leucocyte poor PRP at 1–2 weekly intervals provides a better result than HA during the first 3–6 months, and which may continue up to one year. PRP and HA may have synergistic effect; pain and swelling are the two most com-mon complications with PRP, the incidence is more with leucocyte rich PRP (LP-PRP) and intra-osseous PRP treatment.ConclusionPRP provides hope and is more effective than hyaluronic acid in pain relief and improving the quality of life in mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the knee joint. However, hype, that is effective in all, irrespective of grades of OA, mal-aligned or stiff knee, ligamentous laxity, and can avoid joint replacement is a big hindrance in establishing it as a preferred treatment in OA knee. The author follows the above-mentioned PRP regimen; and recommends to combine leucocyte poor PRP with HA for IA injections & with LP-PRP injections along with the two most common painful points (medial collateral ligament, pesanisernius) in a highly painful OA knee. PRP may not address extra-articular causes of knee pain (mal-alignment, muscle wasting, tendinosis), should be corrected for optimum outcome. Contact sports, running, exercises putting pressure on knee and NSAID should be avoided during PRP treatment. Also, more randomized controlled trials are required to further standardize the PRP preparation, administration, injection interval & proper documentation of efficacy and complications in the regenerative registry.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document