Underground Gas Storage Construction in Gas Fields with Oil Ring and Edge and Bottom Water: A Case Study

Author(s):  
Xiaoliang Huang ◽  
Qiqi Wanyan ◽  
Junyu You ◽  
Hongcheng Xu ◽  
Nanxin Yin ◽  
...  
Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3829
Author(s):  
Jie Zhang ◽  
Feifei Fang ◽  
Wei Lin ◽  
Shusheng Gao ◽  
Yalong Li ◽  
...  

With the increasing energy demands of current modern society, underground gas storage (UGS) in gas fields is the most popular type of UGS used to meet the seasonal variation of gas consumption. However, compared with gas fields, UGS in gas fields has the characteristics of periodic high-speed injection and production of exploitation modes and operation rules, which causes the rules of gas-water seepage and utilization of reserves to be more particular and complicated. In this paper, based on Wen 23 gas storage, the rules of multicycle injection and production flow and the utilization of UGS pore volume were investigated. The experimental results showed that variation in porosity and permeability caused by injection and production pressure changes in Wen 23 gas storage can be neglected. The pore volume of gas storage and the degree of gas recovery increased gradually in the pre-UGS gas zone, which was higher than that of reservoirs. In the initial stage of UGS operation, the pore volume of gas storage and the degree of gas recovery were low in the gas-drive-water gas zone as a result of water invasion during the process of reservoir exploitation. During operation of multicycle high-speed injection and production, the seepage conditions in the gas-drive-water gas zone gradually improved. The higher the reservoir permeability, the greater increases in pore volume and degree of gas recovery. In the gas-water transition zone, gas and water were reciprocated and displaced with the multicycle injection-production of UGS, resulting in the gradual deterioration of pore volume and gas recovery, which remained stable at a low value. The negative effects of reservoir heterogeneity on the effective utilization of UGS occurred in the gas-water transition zone. These findings may contribute to a better understanding of the rules of multicycle injection and production flow and utilization of UGS to optimize the injection-production efficiency of Wen 23 gas storage.


2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 124
Author(s):  
John Croker ◽  
Matthew Kidd ◽  
Evie Nicola ◽  
James Dean

AGL acquired the Silver Springs reserves and operations from Mosaic Oil in 2010, including several depleted yet condensate-rich gas fields. Gas was sent from Silver Springs to the Wallumbilla LPG plant (acquired by AGL in 2011) to be refined into sales gas, LPG and condensate. AGL’s objective was to build a commercial underground gas storage facility by converting the Silver Springs gas field into an underground storage reservoir. The business intent was to run the reservoir in alternating injection and withdrawal mode to take advantage of supply and demand economics. Setting up for injection and withdrawal required the commissioning of 10 petroleum producing wells, bi-directional high-pressure flowlines and associated infrastructure. A high-pressure injection compressor was commissioned. Injection of dry sales gas into wells commenced in 2011. Withdrawal at a higher rate than original was facilitated by new separation and dehydration equipment. The Wallumbilla plant was refitted extensively, including flare and venting upgrades and recertification of the pipeline and every pressure vessel on-site. Withdrawal mode operations commenced in October 2015. The LPG plant operability was demonstrated; however, running at design rate was compromised by excessive chilling in the cryogenic section of the Wallumbilla plant, caused by lower than expected LPG quantities in the withdrawn gas. Process engineering work resulted in design of a regenerative heater to warm the sub-cooled gas. The presentation covers the extent of the improvement work and the process investigations, which have formed the basis to ensure future versatile operation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tongtao Wang ◽  
Jianjun Li ◽  
Gang Jing ◽  
Qingqing Zhang ◽  
Chunhe Yang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document