Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs: current status and future prospects

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilie Johannessen Landmark ◽  
Svein I. Johannessen ◽  
Philip N. Patsalos
2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natarajan Harivenkatesh ◽  
Natarajan Haribalaji ◽  
Darling Chellathai David ◽  
C. M. Prabu Kumar

Author(s):  
Matthew D. Krasowski ◽  
Thomas A. Long ◽  
Christine L. H. Snozek ◽  
Annabel Dizon ◽  
Barbarajean Magnani ◽  
...  

Context.— Therapeutic drug monitoring has traditionally been widely used for first-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as carbamazepine and phenytoin. The last 2 decades have seen the introduction of second- and third-generation AEDs (eg, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate) into clinical practice. Objective.— To use data from the College of American Pathologists Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Extended proficiency testing survey to determine the performance of assays used for therapeutic drug monitoring of newer AEDs, including comparison of enzyme immunoassay and chromatographic techniques. Design.— Six years of proficiency testing surveys were reviewed (2013–2018). Results.— Steady growth was seen in participant volumes for newer AEDs. The analytical performance of automated enzyme immunoassays for lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate was similar to that of chromatographic methods, consistent with published literature using patient samples for comparisons. The majority of participating laboratories now use enzyme immunoassays to measure levetiracetam. Conclusions.— Survey results reflect steadily growing interest in therapeutic drug monitoring of newer AEDs. The increasing availability of robust immunoassays for new AEDs should facilitate their clinical utility, especially for clinical laboratories that do not perform chromatographic assays for therapeutic drug monitoring.


2019 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Aícua‐Rapún ◽  
Pascal André ◽  
Andrea O. Rossetti ◽  
Philippe Ryvlin ◽  
Andreas F. Hottinger ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 444-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Y. Splinter

Eight new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been approved for use within the United States within the past decade. They are felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, and zonisamide. These afford clinicians with more options to increase efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of patients with epilepsy. Pharmacokinetic properties and drug interactions with other AEDs and other medications taken for comorbidities are individually discussed for each of these new agents. Drug concentrations are not routinely monitored for these newer agents, and there have been few studies designed to investigate their concentration-effect relationships. For most of these medications, the concentrations observed in responders and nonresponders overlap considerably and levels associated with efficacy are often associated with adverse events, complicating the definition of target ranges. Also, epilepsy manifests itself sporadically causing difficulty in clinically monitoring efficacy of medications. Therapeutic drug monitoring provides for the individualization of treatment for these agents, which is important because they demonstrate significant variability in inter- and intraindividual pharmaco-kinetic properties. Therapeutic drug monitoring also allows for identification of noncompliance, drug interactions, and toxicity. Current knowledge of the relationships between efficacy, toxicity, and drug concentrations is discussed.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-74
Author(s):  
Peter Gal

Therapeutic drug monitoring is increasingly giving way to dosing drugs based on population-based pharmacokinetic parameters, even when pharmacokinetic values vary quite a bit in individual patients. Further, drug concentrations are often considered appropriate if they are within a defined therapeutic range, even if the patient response is suboptimal. This lecture discusses the limitations of therapeutic ranges in neonates, and proposes greater emphasis on pharmacodynamic curves to individualize drug therapy. Examples are provided using methylxanthines, indomethacin, antiepileptic drugs and aminoglycosides. The potential to use pharmacokinetic findings to describe physiologic changes and occasionally assist with diagnosis is also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document