scholarly journals Uncemented or cemented revision stems? Analysis of 2,296 first-time hip revision arthroplasties performed due to aseptic loosening, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 421-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosef Tyson ◽  
Ola Rolfson ◽  
Johan Kärrholm ◽  
Nils P Hailer ◽  
Maziar Mohaddes
2010 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 667-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Jan F Moojen ◽  
Gijs van Hellemondt ◽  
H Charles Vogely ◽  
Bart J Burger ◽  
Geert H I M Walenkamp ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Prock-Gibbs ◽  
Cyrus Anthony Pumilia ◽  
Teerin Meckmongkol ◽  
John Lovejoy ◽  
Aadil Mumith ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (6) ◽  
pp. 1070-1077
Author(s):  
Christian Hipfl ◽  
Wiebke Mooij ◽  
Carsten Perka ◽  
Sebastian Hardt ◽  
Georgi I. Wassilew

Aims The purpose of this study was to evaluate unexpected positive cultures in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions for presumed aseptic loosening, to assess the prevalence of low-grade infection using two definition criteria, and to analyze its impact on implant survival after revision. Methods A total of 274 THA revisions performed for presumed aseptic loosening from 2012 to 2016 were reviewed. In addition to obtaining intraoperative tissue cultures from all patients, synovial and sonication fluid samples of the removed implant were obtained in 215 cases (79%) and 101 cases (37%), respectively. Histopathological analysis was performed in 250 cases (91%). Patients were classified as having low-grade infections according to institutional criteria and Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2013 criteria. Low-grade infections according to institutional criteria were treated with targeted antibiotics for six weeks postoperatively. Implant failure was defined as the need for re-revision resulting from periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic reasons. The mean follow-up was 68 months (26 to 95). Results Unexpected positive intraoperative samples were found in 77 revisions (28%). Low-grade infection was diagnosed in 36 cases (13%) using institutional criteria and in nine cases (3%) using MSIS ICM 2013 criteria. In all, 41 patients (15%) had single specimen growth of a low-virulent pathogen and were deemed contaminated. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and anaerobes were the most commonly isolated bacteria. Implant failure for PJI was higher in revisions with presumed contaminants (5/41, 12%) compared to those with low-grade infections (2/36, 6%) and those with negative samples (5/197, 3%) (p = 0.021). The rate of all-cause re-revision was similar in patients diagnosed with low-grade infections (5/36, 14%) and those with presumed contaminants (6/41, 15%) and negative samples (21/197, 11%) (p = 0.699). Conclusion Our findings suggest that the presumption of culture contamination in aseptic revision hip arthroplasty may increase the detection of PJI. In this cohort, the presence of low-grade infection did not increase the risk of re-revision. Further studies are needed to assess the relevance of single specimen growth and the benefits of specific postoperative antibiotic regimens. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1070–1077.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tünay Aydin-Yüce ◽  
Gina Kurscheid ◽  
Hagen Sjard Bachmann ◽  
Thorsten Gehrke ◽  
Marcel Dudda ◽  
...  

Studies of aseptic loosening showed an influence of calcitonin andα-CGRP, both encoded from the calcitonin/α-CGRP (CALCA) gene by alternative splicing. The aim of this study was to detect a possible association of the CALCA polymorphisms P1(rs1553005), P2(rs35815751), P3(rs5240), and P4(rs2956) with the time to aseptic loosening after THA. 320 patients suffering from aseptic loosening after primary total hip arthroplasty were genotyped for CALCA-P1 polymorphism and 161 patients for CALCA-P2 and CALCA-P3 polymorphisms and 160 patients for CALCA-P4 polymorphism. CALCA genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction and restriction-fragment length polymorphism. The genotype distribution of CALCA-P1 was CC 10%, CT 43%, and 46% TT. CALCA-P2 showed a distribution of 90.7%II, 8.7% ID, and 0.6% DD. The CALCA-P3 genotype distribution was 97.5% TT and 2.5% TC. The CALCA-P4 genotype distribution was 48.1% AA, 40% AT, and 11.9% TT. Significant differences between the CALCA genotypes were not found concerning age at implantation and replantation, BMI, gender, and cementation technique. No associations of the time for aseptic loosening were found. In conclusion, we did not find a significant association of CALCA polymorphisms and the time to aseptic loosening after primary THA in a Western European group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document