Positive health check: developing a web-based video counseling tool for HIV primary care clinics

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Harshbarger ◽  
Olivia Taylor ◽  
Jennifer D. Uhrig ◽  
Megan A. Lewis
10.2196/10688 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. e10688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Harshbarger ◽  
Olivia Burrus ◽  
Brittany A Zulkiewicz ◽  
Alexa M Ortiz ◽  
Carla A Galindo ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Harshbarger ◽  
Olivia Burrus ◽  
Brittany A Zulkiewicz ◽  
Alexa M Ortiz ◽  
Carla A Galindo ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Web-based interventions can help people living with HIV achieve better clinical outcomes and behaviors, but integrating them into clinical practice remains challenging. There is a gap in understanding the feasibility of implementing these interventions in HIV clinic settings from the clinicians’ perspective. OBJECTIVE The goal of the research was to determine whether Positive Health Check (PHC)—a Web-based, tailored video counseling tool focused on increasing patient adherence and retention in care and reducing HIV risk among HIV-positive patients—was acceptable, appropriate, and feasible for HIV primary care clinic staff to implement in clinic workflows. METHODS A multiple-case study design was used to evaluate the pilot implementation. Four primary care clinics located in the southeastern United States implemented PHC over a 1-month period. Nine clinic staff across the clinics participated in structured interviews before, during, and after the implementation. In total, 54 interviews were conducted. We used a framework analysis approach to code the data and identify themes related to implementation outcomes, including acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. We also analyzed patient intervention use metrics (n=104) to quantify patient intervention completion rates (n=68). RESULTS Overall, clinicians viewed PHC as acceptable and appropriate. Themes that emerged related to these implementation outcomes include the ability for PHC to increase provider-patient communication and its ability to engage patients due to the tailored and interactive design. While generally feasible to implement, challenges to the clinic workflow and physical environment were areas that clinics needed to manage to make PHC work in their clinics. CONCLUSIONS Findings from this pilot implementation suggest that clinical staff viewed PHC as acceptable and appropriate, especially as more patients used the intervention over the pilot period. Feasibility of implementation was challenging in some cases, and lessons learned from this pilot implementation can provide information for larger scale tests of the intervention that include assessment of both implementation outcomes and clinical outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 106097
Author(s):  
Megan A. Lewis ◽  
Camilla Harshbarger ◽  
Carla Bann ◽  
Olivia Burrus ◽  
Susana Peinado ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110209
Author(s):  
Brigid Adviento ◽  
Michael Conner ◽  
Alexander Sarkisian ◽  
Nicolette Walano ◽  
Hans Andersson ◽  
...  

The PREMM5 model is a web-based clinical prediction algorithm that estimates the gene-specific risk of an individual carrying a Lynch syndrome germline mutation based on targeted family history questions. The objectives of our study were to determine the feasibility of screening for LS in an urban, minority patient population in a primary care setting using the PREMM5 model and characterize patient barriers associated with difficulty completing the questions. Participants were recruited from Tulane Internal Medicine primary care clinics on 9 random collection dates. Our data illustrates the difficulty patients have in recalling important details necessary to answer the PREMM questionnaire.


2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (S1) ◽  
pp. 48-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Callahan ◽  
Neil M. Flynn ◽  
Christina A. Kuenneth ◽  
Sheila R. Enders

Author(s):  
Austin A Marshall ◽  
Darcy A Wooten

Abstract Rotations in HIV primary care clinics have the potential to teach trainees core competencies and influence their career pathway. We found that fund of knowledge, confidence in obtaining a sexual history, and interest in an ID career all increased following an HIV clinic rotation.


2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebekah Pratt ◽  
Daniel M. Saman ◽  
Clayton Allen ◽  
Benjamin Crabtree ◽  
Kris Ohnsorg ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In this paper we describe the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to study implementation of a web-based, point-of-care, EHR-linked clinical decision support (CDS) tool designed to identify and provide care recommendations for adults with prediabetes (Pre-D CDS). Methods As part of a large NIH-funded clinic-randomized trial, we identified a convenience sample of interview participants from 22 primary care clinics in Minnesota, North Dakota, and Wisconsin that were randomly allocated to receive or not receive a web-based EHR-integrated prediabetes CDS intervention. Participants included 11 clinicians, 6 rooming staff, and 7 nurse or clinic managers recruited by study staff to participate in telephone interviews conducted by an expert in qualitative methods. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and data analysis was conducted using a constructivist version of grounded theory. Results Implementing a prediabetes CDS tool into primary care clinics was useful and well received. The intervention was integrated with clinic workflows, supported primary care clinicians in clearly communicating prediabetes risk and management options with patients, and in identifying actionable care opportunities. The main barriers to CDS use were time and competing priorities. Finally, while the implementation process worked well, opportunities remain in engaging the care team more broadly in CDS use. Conclusions The use of CDS tools for engaging patients and providers in care improvement opportunities for prediabetes is a promising and potentially effective strategy in primary care settings. A workflow that incorporates the whole care team in the use of such tools may optimize the implementation of CDS tools like these in primary care settings. Trial registration Name of the registry: Clinicaltrial.gov. Trial registration number: NCT02759055. Date of registration: 05/03/2016. URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02759055 Prospectively registered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document