Multilevel policy responses to mainstream climate adaptation through watershed development in rainfed farming systems of India

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 324-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vrishali Ramkrishna Chaudhari ◽  
Arabinda Mishra
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vrishali Parab

This thesis studies how institutional interplay (i.e. interaction between institutions), across different scales and levels of governance, can determine the post-project sustainability of watershed development programmes (WDP, henceforth), which are institutional interventions taken towards the holistic development of rural farming systems. Integrated watershed development has become one of the main vehicles of rural development in rainfed areas in India. Yet, in spite of the several local success stories, the participatory watershed development has not reached their desired scaling-up. Lack of the post-project sustainability of these projects is considered as one of the main factors behind this failure. This study frames the problem of post-project sustainability as the query of institutional analysis, where a WDP is construed as a composite of institutional interventions. To understand how the institutional interplay between this intervention (i.e. WDP) and other institutions of its environment affect its governance, especially in the post-project sustainability, this thesis investigated the following core research questions: i. How the interactions between WDP and other institutions influence its post-project sustainability? ii. What are the mechanisms of these interactions, in terms of causal pathways and instruments by which one institution affects the outcome or development of another? To answer these questions, this thesis used the case study method. The design of this case study was made with the intent of understanding the institutional factors behind the post-project sustainability of a drought-prone village in District Jalna of Maharashtra, where a watershed development programme was implemented during 1996-2002 under the aegis of Indo-German Watershed Development Programme (IGWDP). After more than a decade of the project’s conclusion, the village has come to the forefront as an example of successful watershed development and general water literacy that enabled the local farmers to survive and even prosper through the recent drought of 2012-13. While Kadwanchi had relatively unique position among the many other watershed development programmes in the area due to its success, it also shared many common characteristics of the rainfed farming systems of the region. However, it should be noted that the unit of analysis of this case study was not the Kadwanchi watershed per se, but the phenomenon of institutional interplay in the local-level governance. The constructivist-interpretive approach influenced the data collection and analysis. Primary methods of data collection during the fieldwork were interview, narrative inquiry, and participant observation. The data was coded qualitatively by both the sets of deductive and emergent codes through the assistance of web-based QDA software WeftQDA. The empirical analysis also contained a component of policy analysis, that focused on understanding how policy developments at regional and national level can influence the local governance of watershed management. The analysis of these interactions focused on understanding their causal mechanisms. For this purpose, it sought to identify the tangible structures and processes through which, the institutional changes were brought upon in these interactions. The thesis proposed these structures and processes to be called as ‘transmission instruments’ of interplay. Altogether, this case study along with analysis led to inferences on both empirical and theoretical quests of this thesis. In the former category, the study identified historical and emerging policy developments influencing the watershed sector in India. It also acknowledged that the concept of post-project sustainability is multidimensional in nature, which proved to be crucial in its institutional analysis. The thesis identified the key institutional interactions that facilitated Kadwanchi’s post-project watershed resource governance. The narrative analysis of the fieldwork drew the attention to the significance of equitability in this context. Observed and analysed the key institutional interactions shaping the local governance of Kadwanchi’s watershed management. These inferences led to the modification of its proposed analytical framework for interplay analysis. In conclusion, this thesis considered these inferences vis-à-vis the emerging policy trends in the sector and identified the policy implications of the case study in the larger scope of watershed governance. These implications mainly concerned the changing nature of the ‘participation’ in rainfed farming systems and challenges of policy integration. On theoretical front, the thesis reconsidered analytical framework of interplay in the light of case study inferences, and modified it with additional suggestions of transmission instruments, before emphasizing on their importance in interplay analysis.


2011 ◽  
pp. 467-510
Author(s):  
Guy P. Lafond ◽  
Stewart A. Brandt ◽  
George W. Clayton ◽  
R. Byron Irvine ◽  
William E. May

Author(s):  
. Reflis ◽  
M. Nurung ◽  
Juliana Dewi Pratiwi

This research aims to identify factors correlated significantly to the motivation of farmers in perseving traditional rainfed farming systems, such as using local seeds and planting once a year.  The population of this study is farmer who still perform the traditional paddy farming system in the Village of North Tapanuli Parbaju Julu County North Sumatra Province. As much as 48 respondents randomly selected from 160 farmers.  A descriptive analyse and Spearman rank correlation are applied in this study.   The study showed that formal education, farmers' perception of the traditional system of rice farming are correlated significantly to farmer motivation in preserving tradional farming system while non-formal education, the traditional system of farming experience, farm size, number of family members are not.  Factors that correlated significantly to farmer motivation in maintaining local seed is non-formal education, farming experience, while the traditional system of formal education, farmers' perception of traditional rice farming system, farm size, number of family members are not correlated significantly.  Furthermore, the number of family members is merely factor that correlated significantly to the farmers motivation in maintaining once a year plantings while others factors are not correlated. Key words: farmer motivation, preserving, traditional farming


2011 ◽  
pp. 75-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hayman ◽  
Jason Crean ◽  
Canesio Predo

2011 ◽  
pp. 395-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Hardy ◽  
Luthando Dziba ◽  
Willem Kilian ◽  
John Tolmay

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasir Mahmood ◽  
Muhammad Arshad ◽  
Harald Kaechele ◽  
Muhammad Faisal Shahzad ◽  
Ayat Ullah ◽  
...  

Climate change is a severe threat to the agricultural sector in general and to rainfed farming in particular. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors that can potentially affect the adaptation process against climate change. This study focused on wheat farmers and farming systems in the rainfed agroecological zone of Pakistan. Farmers’ data related to climate change fatalism, the availability of climate-specific extension services, socioeconomic and institutional variables, and farm characteristics were collected. A logit model to assess farmers’ decisions to adopt an adaptation measure and a multinomial logit model to assess their choice of various adaptation measures were used. The results showed that fatalistic farmers were unlikely to implement climate change adaptation measures. The variables related to the climate-specific extension services, including farmers’ participation in training on climate-resilient crop farming and the availability of mobile communication-based advisory services, had highly significant and positive impacts on farmers’ decisions and their choice of adaptation measures. Input market access and tractor ownership also had positive and significant impacts on farmers’ decisions to adapt and their choice of adaptation measures. This study highlights the need to improve rainfed-wheat farmers’ education levels to change their fatalistic attitudes towards climate change. Furthermore, government action is needed to provide climate-specific extension services to ensure sustainable production levels that will ultimately lead to food and livelihood security under a changing climate.


2000 ◽  
Vol 135 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. OLJACA ◽  
R. CVETKOVIC ◽  
D. KOVACEVIC ◽  
G. VASIC ◽  
N. MOMIROVIC

A field study was conducted on an experimental field of the Maize Research Institute Zemun Polje- Belgrade (latitude: 44° 49′ N), Yugoslavia over a 3 year period (1994–1996). The objective of this study was to find the optimal spatial arrangement of a maize–beans intercrop in irrigated and rainfed farming systems.Plant arrangement patterns in an intercropping system did not significantly affect LAI values in maize compared with a sole crop, while irrigation had a greater positive influence on it. Leaf area values of beans were more sensitive to the same treatments. Microenvironmental conditions in maize–bean mixtures were more favourable for bean crop than for sole beans.An intercropping system had a greater influence on yield components of maize. Component combination 1/2[ratio ]1/2 (maize[ratio ]bean) was most effective in all yield components of maize. Intraspecific competition appears to be more intense than interspecific competition in both crops. Yield component of bean was more sensitive to water regime of the site than to planting pattern in an intercrop. Irrigation increased all yield components of bean (especially pod number). The intercropping system decreased harvest index in both crops compared with monocrops. Maximum total grain yield was in 1994 in irrigated maize–bean intercrop 1/2[ratio ]1/2, with highest efficiency being in an intercrop in irrigation in 1995. The Land Equivalent Ratio (LER), based on grain yield, was consistently greater than 1·0 in an irrigation water regime in 1995. Proportion of maize[ratio ]bean = 1/2[ratio ]1/2 gave the highest increase of yield (LER = 1·54). Under conditions of chernozem soil type in Zemun Polje, with often-expressed dry periods, irrigation is a very important measure for increasing maize–beans intercrop productivity.


2011 ◽  
pp. 715-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Kirkegaard ◽  
Mark B. Peoples ◽  
John F. Angus ◽  
Murray J. Unkovich

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document