The role risk-management plays in reducing insider threat’s in the federal Government

Author(s):  
Alexander Gregory Stone
1992 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Peter Peters

In West Germany the `information disaster' after Chernobyl offered an opportunity to study the credibility of different information sources. A representative survey conducted in May 1987 of the West German population showed that on average the Federal Government—although heavily criticized because of its information policy and risk management—was rated most credible while the nuclear industry was judged least credible. On the whole, mean credibility ratings differed surprisingly little between sources; ratings of competence and public interest orientation varied more. These variables, interpreted as the classical credibility factors `expertise' and `trustworthiness', were important predictors of credibility. But beliefs and expectations recipients posess about individual sources also appear to influence credibility.


2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 611-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh Grove ◽  
Lorenzo Patelli

In mid-March, 2008, with substantial government support, JP Morgan Chase agreed to acquire Bear Stearns for $10 per share. Because Bear’s shares traded at $170 a year earlier, the market cap destruction of 94% was devastating to the once venerable investment bank and its investors. The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission had also cited as failure the inconsistent treatment by the federal government in helping to bail out Bear Stearns in March, 2008 but letting Lehman Brothers go into bankruptcy in September, 2008. This paper investigates such inconsistencies by comparing and assessing the risk management and corporate governance practices of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers in their March-September, 2008.


2020 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 404-437
Author(s):  
James Batista Vieira ◽  
Amanda Batista Araújo

This paper describes the current stage of the development of the ministries’ risk management systems, considering the demands and orientations given by the Joint Normative Instruction MP/CGU n. 01/2016 and the Public Governance Decree (Decree n. 9.203, of November 22, 2017, altered by the Decree n. 9.901, of July 8, 2019). With the intention of identifying how each ministry has been managing the risks that aim at ensuring that the goals of the public policies and the strengthening of their own governance structures will be met, this research formulated indicators that allow cases to be described, based on the recommendations of national and international standards of governance and risk management. The results show that Brazilian ministerial risk management is still incipient, due to the fragile institutionalization associated with political-administrative instability. There is still a need for institutionalizing a culture of risk management and mainly, adopting a long-term perspective in the public sector organizations so that consistent risk management systems can be effectively implemented.


Author(s):  
David Mortimer ◽  
Sharon T. Mortimer
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document