scholarly journals N-terminal selective conjugation method widens the therapeutic window of antibody–drug conjugates by improving tolerability and stability

mAbs ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1914885
Author(s):  
Min Ji Ko ◽  
Daehae Song ◽  
Juhee Kim ◽  
Jae Yong Kim ◽  
Jaehyun Eom ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Frederik Marmé

Background Despite the advances that have been made to improve conventional chemotherapies, their use is limited by a narrow therapeutic window based on off-target toxicities. Antibody-drug-conjugates (ADCs) are composed of an antibody and a toxic payload covalently coupled by a chemical linker. They constitute an elegant means to tackle the limitations of conventional chemotherapeutics by selectively delivering a highly toxic payload directly to target cells and thereby increasing efficacy of the delivered cytotoxic but at the same time limiting systemic exposure and toxicities. As such they appear inspired by Paul Ehrlich´s concept of a “magic bullet”, which he envisioned as drugs that go directly to their target to attack pathogens but remain harmless in healthy tissues. Summary The concept of conjugating drugs to antibodies via chemical linkers is not new. As early as in the 1960s researchers started to investigate such ADCs in animal models and first clinical trials based on mouse antibodies began in the 1980s. Although the concept appears relatively straightforward, ADCs are highly complex molecules, and it took several decades of research and development until the first ADC became approved by the FDA in 2000 and the second followed not until 11 years later. The development of an effective ADC is highly demanding, and each individual component of an ADC must be optimized: the target, the antibody, the linker and its conjugation chemistry as well as the cytotoxic payload. Today there are 9 approved ADCs overall and 3 for breast cancer. So, the pace of development seems to pick up with over 100 candidates in various stages of clinical development. Many ADCs of the newest generation are optimized to elicit a so-called bystander effect, to increase efficacy and tackle heterogneous antigen expression. This approach requires a balancing of efficacy and systemic toxicity. Hence, ADCs based on their complex biology cause relevant toxicities, which are characteristic for each specific compound and may include hematologic toxicities, elevated transaminases, gastrointestinal events, pneumonitis but also ocular toxicities as well as others many physicians may initially not be very familiar with. Management of the side effects will be key to the successful clinical use of these potent drugs. Key Messages This review focusses on the clinical experience with ADCs approved in breast cancer as well as promising candidates in late-stage clinical development. We will discuss the mode of action, biology, and composition of ADCs and how each of these crucial components influences their properties and efficacy.


Author(s):  
Rohan Mathur ◽  
George J. Weiner

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) combine the cytotoxic potential of chemotherapeutic drugs with the specificity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). After many years of unfulfilled promise, the field of ADCs is experiencing resurgence as more is learned about each of the components of an ADC and how these components need to be combined to produce a successful therapeutic agent. Choosing an appropriate target for ADCs is a critical parameter that effects the efficacy, therapeutic window, and toxicity profile of ADCs. This review will focus on the concepts underlying the choice of the target, review specific current ADCs and their targets, and look to the future of ADCs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3556
Author(s):  
Jamie L. Stokke ◽  
Deepa Bhojwani

The clinical development of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) has gained momentum in recent years and these agents are gradually moving into frontline regimens for pediatric acute leukemias. ADCs consist of a monoclonal antibody attached to a cytotoxic payload by a cleavable linker. This structure allows for highly cytotoxic agents to be directly delivered to leukemia cells leading to cell death and avoids excessive off-tumor toxicity. Near universal expression on B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) blasts and the ability of rapid internalization has rendered CD22 an ideal target for ADC in B-ALL. Inotuzumab ozogamicin, the anti-CD22 antibody linked to calicheamicin led to complete remission rates of 60–80% in patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the CD33 targeting gemtuzumab ozogamicin has demonstrated modest improvements in survival and is the only ADC currently licensed in the United States for pediatric patients with de novo AML. Several other ADCs have been developed and tested clinically for leukemia but have achieved limited success to date. The search for additional leukemia-specific targets and optimization of ADC structure and specificity are ongoing efforts to improve their therapeutic window. This review provides a comprehensive overview of ADCs in acute leukemias, with a focus on pediatric ALL and AML.


Author(s):  
Hans-Georg Hans-Georg Lerchen ◽  
Beatrix Stelte-Ludwig ◽  
Anette Sommer ◽  
Sandra Berndt ◽  
Dennis Kirchhoff ◽  
...  

With the approval of meanwhile five ADCs and more than 80 ADCs in clinical trials, the ADC landscape has developed rapidly during the last decade. However, as indicated also by the large number of ADCs which failed in the clinic, it remains challenging to achieve a sufficiently large therapeutic window in cancer patients.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Kim ◽  
Ogunkoya Ayodele ◽  
Colin Hickle ◽  
Fangjiu Zhang ◽  
Chuprakov Stepan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 1324-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Shinmi ◽  
Eri Taguchi ◽  
Junko Iwano ◽  
Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi ◽  
Kazuhiro Masuda ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
D.L. Meyer ◽  
S.O. Doronina ◽  
T.D. Bovee ◽  
J.B. Miyamoto ◽  
M.E. Anderson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 140-141
Author(s):  
Alexander Kretzschmar

Die Therapielandschaft des metastasierten Urothelkarzinoms hat sich seit der Zulassung der ersten Immun-Checkpoint-Inhibitoren verändert. Die neuen Therapien sind deutlich effektiver, allerdings erreichen die Responseraten der neuen Therapien nur bis zu etwa 30 %, beklagte Prof. Matthew Milowsky, Chapel Hill/USA, auf einer Oral Abstract Session auf dem ASCO-GU. In San Francisco gaben erste Vorträge und Poster bereits einen Einblick, wovon diejenigen Patienten profitieren könnten, die auf die etablierten Chemotherapien und die neuen Immuntherapien nicht ansprechen. Manche Onkologen sprechen bereits von der „Post-Checkpoint-Ära”. Als Kandidaten werden vor allem Antikörper-Wirkstoff-Konjugate (antibody-drug conjugates; ADC) gehandelt – und zwar nicht nur zur Therapie des metastasierten Blasenkarzinoms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document