The ever-widening contexts of Konstantin Stanislavsky

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-21
Author(s):  
Laurence Senelick
2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-150
Author(s):  
Jerri Daboo

The Routledge Performance Practitioners series, edited by Franc Chamberlain, is a new set of introductory guides to a range of key figures in the development of twentieth-century performance practice. Each book focuses on a single practitioner, examining his or her life, historical context, key writings, and productions, and a selection of practical exercises. These concise volumes are intended to offer students an initial introduction to the practitioner and to “provide an inspiring spring-board for future study, unpacking and explaining what can initially seem daunting” (Merlin, ii). The list of practitioners in the complete series include Stanislavsky, Brecht, Boal, Lecoq, Grotowski, Anna Halprin, and Ariane Mnouchkine, thus examining a range of performance styles and practices, creating a valuable overview of the development of performer training through the twentieth and into the twenty-first centuries. Such interest in the history of specific approaches to training performers has been addressed in other volumes, such as Twentieth-Century Actor Training, edited by Alison Hodge (New York: Routledge, 2000), and Acting (Re)considered: A Theoretical and Practical Guide, edited by Phillip Zarrilli (London: Routledge 2002). Both those collections contain in-depth chapters focusing on aspects of the selected practitioners' theoretical and practical approaches to the principles and concerns in their work. Where the books in the Routledge Performance Practitioners series differ is that they offer a more general overview of the practitioner in one volume, and in addition to the historical context, they provide a set of practical exercises that can be carried out by the student or teacher, as well as by the actor or director. The books are well presented, divided into clear sections, with relevant photographs and diagrams. There are also sidebars providing definitions and further information on key figures and terms mentioned in the main text. This review covers the first four books in the series, examining the work of Konstantin Stanislavsky, Michael Chekhov, Vsevolod Meyerhold, and Jacques Lecoq.


2021 ◽  
pp. 216-229
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Kornaś ◽  
Sylwia Dobkowska

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rose Whyman

The term ‘psychophysical’ in relation to acting and performer training is widely used by theatre scholars and practitioners. Konstantin Stanislavsky is considered to have been an innovator in developing an approach to Western acting focused on both psychology and physicality. The discourse encompasses questions of practice, of creativity and emotion, the philosophical problem of mind–body from Western and Eastern perspectives of spirituality. In this article, Rose Whyman attempts to uncover what Stanislavsky meant by his limited use of the term ‘psychophysical’ and suggests that much of the discourse remains prone to a dualist mind–body approach. Clarification of this is needed in order to further understanding of the practice of training performers. Rose Whyman is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Drama and Theatre Arts at the University of Birmingham. She researches the science of actor training and is the author of The Stanislavsky System of Acting (Cambridge, 2008) and Stanislavsky: the Basics (Routledge, 2013).


2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Andrew White

Fin-de-siècle Russia was a culture replete with interest in the occult, spiritualism, and the religions of the Far East. Curiosity about the mystical infused all tiers of society. Among those influenced by the spiritual was none other than Konstantin Stanislavsky himself, who experienced a personal crisis in which he began to doubt his own ability as an actor. In 1906, he took his now-famous trip to Finland, where he sequestered himself for the summer, examined his artistic life, and began to reconsider seriously his process as an actor. While reflecting on his past artistic work, he began to organize years of notes on acting; and several notions drawn from Eastern mysticism in general and Yoga in particular found their way into his “system.” Although a handful of articles that examine Stanislavsky's use of Yoga have been published in the West, over the past century scholars and teachers have paid little attention to the spiritual facets of Stanislavsky's thinking, focusing instead on the psychological aspects of his work. Given, however, the presence of important Yogic elements in the system at its very inception, a full understanding of Stanislavsky's technique is impossible without knowledge of the intersections between his system and Yoga. Borrowing from Yoga, Stanislavsky offers actors much more than theories about how to be more believable or psychologically realistic in their roles. He adapts specific Yogic exercises in order to help actors transcend the limitations of the physical senses and tap into higher levels of creative consciousness.


Author(s):  
Carmen Stanciu

Esse artigo captura a apresentação, discussões e diálogo interativo da conferência A função teatral da imagem e sua relação com os outros elementos da encenação. A ideia principal da conferência é que hoje em dia o contexto das artes performáticas pede reconsideração do método pedagógico da profissão de diretor teatral. Eu vou lembrar como o “trabalho” de diretor teatral emergiu no século XIX como um resultado lógico da industrialização. Trazer luz elétrica aos auditórios de teatro, construir grandes teatros com longos palcos, o apetite do público por encenações elaboradas e realistas usando modelos #D e maquinário complicado – tudo isso impôs a necessidade de um homem que tem ou desenvolve habilidades e knowhow de encenar. E foi assim que a história do teatro mundial foi reescrita no século XX – O Século do Diretor. Além disso, as duas pessoas mais influentes do teatro do último século foram ambos diretores e professores: Konstantin Stanislavsky e Bertolt Brecht. Mas e sobre nosso século XXI? O teatro ainda é um playground para os diretores? Minha teoria é que as artes performáticas hoje estão apagando os padrões “tradicionais” dos precursores do teatro sob a pressão do novo papel que o teatro é exigido a performar na sociedade. O teatro do Era Digital precisa ter a mesma estrutura “pixelada” que todas as outras criações humanas. Esse é o porquê eu acredito fortemente que a pedagogia do teatro deve ser reconsiderada e reorganizada tendo como sua ideia central a dicotomia entre a estrutura dramática e pós-dramática da peça. Afinal, como Peter Brook disse, “uma peça é uma peça”. Como suporte para demonstração e discussões, usarei a teoria de Meyerhold sobre como construir uma performance, o diagrama de Schlemmer sobre tipos de performances, as observações de Brecht sobre teatro dramático versus teatro épico, a teoria de Lehmann sobre teatro pós-dramático e os argumentos de Erika Fischer-Lichte sobre estéticas transformadoras. Usarei imagens de shows encenados por diretores de teatro de destaque, que marcaram ou marcam como fazemos e vemos o teatro hoje.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-223
Author(s):  
Anna E. Zavyalova ◽  

The article is the first to examine the issue of the influence of Ivan Turgenev’s works on the art of Mstislav Dobuzhinsky not only in scenography, but also in illustrations and vignettes. Thanks to the artist’s memoirs, it was established that Turgenev’s works did not arouse his creative interest. It is concluded that Dobuzhinsky read the novels The Noble Nest and Smoke in his youth. In the design of Turgenev’s plays A Month in the Village; Breakfast at the Leader; The Workman; Where it is thin, there it is torn; and Provincial for the Moscow Art Theater, Dobuzhinsky turned to the proposal and choice of Konstantin Stanislavsky. The author used a comprehensive method that combined a formal-stylistic analysis of the sketches of sets and costumes, illustrations and vignettes, with a source-based analysis of the artist’s diaries and letters. It was revealed that the silhouette-figure “Girl with Flowers” can be attributed to the complex of these vignettes. The article is the first to address the issue of Dobuzhinsky’s appeal to the art of the Italian Renaissance. It is established that the Cathedral of Santi Giovanni e Paolo in Venice influenced the image of the greenhouse in the sketches of the scenery for the play based on the play A Month in the Village, while the portraits of Pietro della Fancesca and Sandro Botticelli influenced the portrait of actress Lydia Koreneva.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document