A retrospective study assessing the accuracy of [18F]–fluorocholine PET/CT for primary staging of lymph node metastases in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection

Abstract Background: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) can be used to detect and stage metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer. Improvements to hardware, such as digital technology, and to software, such as reconstruction algorithms, have recently been made. We compared the capability of detecting regional lymph node metastases using conventional and digital silicon photomultiplier (SiPM)-based PET-CT technology for [18F]-fluorocholine (FCH). Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) histopathology was used as the reference method.Methods: Retrospectively, a consecutive series of patients with prostate cancer who had undergone staging with FCH PET-CT before ePLND were included. Images were obtained with either a conventional or a SiPM-based PET-CT and compared. FCH uptake in pelvic lymph nodes beyond the uptake in the mediastinal blood pool was considered to be abnormal.Results: One hundred eighty patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer were examined using a conventional Philips Gemini PET-CT (n = 93) between 2015 and 2017 or a digital GE Discovery MI PET-CT (n = 87) from 2017 to 2018. Images that were obtained using the Philips Gemini PET-CT system showed 19 patients (20%) with suspected lymph node metastases compared with 40 patients (46%) using the GE Discovery MI PET-CT. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) were 0.30, 0.84, 0.47, and 0.72, respectively, for the Philips Gemini and 0.60, 0.58, 0.30, and 0.83, respectively for GE Discovery MI. Area under the curve (AUC) in a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was similar between the two PET-CT systems (0.58 and 0.58, P = 0.8).Conclusions: A marked difference in sensitivity and specificity was found for the different PET-CT systems. Independent of the PET-CT system, the overall diagnostic performance was poor (but similar), and FCH PET-CT should not be used for initial staging of patients with prostate cancer.

Download Full-text

Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Comparing Conventional and Digital [18F]-fluorocholine PET-CT Using Histopathology as Reference

10.21203/rs.3.rs-552089/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Mimmi Bjöersdorff ◽

Christopher Puterman ◽

Jenny Oddstig ◽

Jennifer Amidi ◽

Sophia Zackrisson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Lymph Node ◽

High Risk ◽

Lymph Nodes ◽

Lymph Node Metastases ◽

Reconstruction Algorithms ◽

High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽

Pet Ct ◽

Risk Prostate Cancer ◽

Node Metastases

Abstract Background: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) can be used to detect and stage metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer. Improvements to hardware, such as digital technology, and to software, such as reconstruction algorithms, have recently been made. We compared the capability of detecting regional lymph node metastases using conventional and digital silicon photomultiplier (SiPM)-based PET-CT technology for [18F]-fluorocholine (FCH). Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) histopathology was used as the reference method.Methods: Retrospectively, a consecutive series of patients with prostate cancer who had undergone staging with FCH PET-CT before ePLND were included. Images were obtained with either a conventional or a SiPM-based PET-CT and compared. FCH uptake in pelvic lymph nodes beyond the uptake in the mediastinal blood pool was considered to be abnormal.Results: One hundred eighty patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer were examined using a conventional Philips Gemini PET-CT (n = 93) between 2015 and 2017 or a digital GE Discovery MI PET-CT (n = 87) from 2017 to 2018. Images that were obtained using the Philips Gemini PET-CT system showed 19 patients (20%) with suspected lymph node metastases compared with 40 patients (46%) using the GE Discovery MI PET-CT. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) were 0.30, 0.84, 0.47, and 0.72, respectively, for the Philips Gemini and 0.60, 0.58, 0.30, and 0.83, respectively for GE Discovery MI. Area under the curve (AUC) in a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was similar between the two PET-CT systems (0.58 and 0.58, P = 0.8).Conclusions: A marked difference in sensitivity and specificity was found for the different PET-CT systems, although similar overall diagnostic performance. This is probably due to differences in both hard- and software, including reconstruction algorithms, and should be considered when new technology is introduced.

Download Full-text

The impact of extended lymph node dissection versus neoadjuvant therapy with limited lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional analysis.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.6_suppl.e543 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽

pp. e543-e543

Author(s):

Takuya Koie ◽

Teppei Ookubo ◽

Koji Mitsuzuka ◽

Shintaro Narita ◽

Takamitsu Inoue ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Lymph Node ◽

High Risk ◽

Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽

Lymph Node Dissection ◽

Biochemical Recurrence ◽

Node Dissection ◽

Extended Lymph Node Dissection ◽

High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽

Risk Prostate Cancer

e543 Background: The optimal treatment for high-risk prostate cancer (Pca) remains to be established. We previously reported favorable biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) in high-risk Pca patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy comprising a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate (EMP) (LHRH+EMP) followed by radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of this study was to assess whether neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP confers an oncological benefit for high-risk Pca compared to extended lymph node dissection (e-PLND). Methods: The Michinoku Urological Cancer Study Group database contained the data of 2403 consecutive Pca patients treated with RP at 4 institutes between March 2000 and December 2014. In the e-PLND group, we identified 238 high-risk Pca patients who underwent RP and e-PLND, with lymphatic tissue removal around the obturator and the external iliac regions, and hypogastric lymph node dissection. The neoadjuvant therapy with limited PLND (l-PLND) group included 280 high-risk Pca patients who underwent RP and removal of the obturator node chain between September 2005 and June 2014 at Hirosaki University. The neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP therapy included the administration of 280 mg/day of LHRH and EMP for 6 months before RP. The outcome measure was BRFS. Results: The 5-year BRFS rates for the neoadjuvant therapy with l-PLND group and e-PLND group were 84.9% and 54.7%, respectively ( P < 0.0001). The operative time was significantly longer in the e-PLND group compared to that of the neoadjuvant therapy with l-PLND group. Grade 3/4 surgery-related complications were not identified in both groups. Conclusions: Although the present study was not randomized, neoadjuvant LHRH+EMP therapy followed by RP might reduce the risk of biochemical recurrence.

Download Full-text