scholarly journals The Public Health Leadership and Implementation Academy (PH-LEADER) for Non-Communicable Diseases

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla I. Galaviz ◽  
K. M. Venkat Narayan ◽  
Olivia Manders ◽  
Deborah A. McFarland ◽  
Shifalika Goenka ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 562-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Shickle ◽  
M. Day ◽  
K. Smith ◽  
K. Zakariasen ◽  
J. Moskol ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm Forbes ◽  
Mark Patrick Taylor

AbstractThe public health leadership and management of lead exposure in a lead mining and smelting community in Mount Isa is an ongoing issue. There exists deficiencies in public health and environmental legal frameworks that regulate lead exposure and management in Mount Isa, Queensland. Although some positive practical measures on lead containment have been implemented, evidence suggests they are currently inadequate. Greater investments in public health leadership at a local and state level are required to address the ongoing issue of lead in Mount Isa.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bulent Kilic ◽  
Peter Phillimore ◽  
Duygu Islek ◽  
Dilek Oztoprak ◽  
Eren Korkmaz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Maric-Bajs ◽  
A Puljak ◽  
M Polić Vižintin

Abstract Background Inappropriate habits and behaviour patterns are risk factors for most chronic non-communicable diseases. Prevention and education are one of the continuous tasks of public health professionals. Primary preventive care requires an active approach from the health professionals. Methods This program includes preventive examination and certain laboratory tests persons older than 55 who did not visit their family doctor at least two years. 721 persons were examined and interviewed from 2014 to 2018. The paper shows analytic results expressed in percentages of the prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A total of 721 patients were included. Sex ratio male:female was 0.47. The age (mean) was 61.4 years [standard deviation (SD) = 9.1]. Up to three alcoholic drinks per week consumed 22.1% respondents (37.1% male and 11.9% female). There were 24.1% smokers and 14.6% former smokers. Overweight (BMI 25-30) were 44.4% male and 36.3% female. Obese (BMI>30) were 27.6% male and 30.3% female. Digitorectal examination was performed in 582 persons and detected pathological phenomena in 10.3% female and 19.4% male. Hypertension was found in 14.9% male and 18.2% female. Isolated systolic hypertension was found in 19.8% male and 16.7% female, and isolated diastolic hypertension in 3.9% male and 3.5% female. Suspicion on one or more newly diagnosed disease was placed in 55.9% (95% CI 52.3-59.5) respondents. In total, there was a suspicion of 696 newly diagnosed diseases. Newly diagnosed diseases were disorders of lipoprotein metabolism (n = 156, 21.6%), followed by hypertension (n = 69, 9.6%), obesity (n = 52, 7.2%) and independent of insulin diabetes (n = 51, 7,1%). 53 persons [7,4% (95% CI 5,4-9,3)] had suspected neoplasm and they were immediately referred for further diagnostic evaluation. Conclusions The public health significance of such programs with active approach and detecting malignant state as early as possible is extremely important. Key messages Primary preventive care requires an active approach from the health professionals. Detecting chronic non-communicable diseases in earlier phase is important and confirms the public health significance of prevention programs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-94
Author(s):  
Brandon Grimm ◽  
Melissa Tibbits ◽  
Shannon Maloney ◽  
Patrik Johansson ◽  
Mohammad Siahpush

For over 20 years the current model of Public Health Leadership Institutes (PHLIs) has been the primary model for “leadership” development. Past studies have shown that the model is successful in increasing participants’ knowledge and developing individual skills. However, limited evidence suggests that the model leads to outcome-based results. This review compares the current PHLI model with traditional corporate leadership development models and determines that the PHLI model is in fact related more closely with a “leader” development model. Additionally, it is suggested that it is not possible to measure outcome-based results because of the limitations of the current model. Finally, recommendations are made to refine the model to make it more closely aligned with a true “leadership” development model, thus making it more effective at educating and training the current public health workforce.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 64S-70S ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine C. Matson ◽  
Jeffrey L. Lake ◽  
R. Dana Bradshaw ◽  
David O. Matson

1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 304 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Douglas Scutchfield ◽  
Carol Spain ◽  
Dennis D. Pointer ◽  
Joseph M. Hafey

Author(s):  
SarahAnn M. McFadden ◽  
Amyn A. Malik ◽  
Obianuju G. Aguolu ◽  
Kathryn S. Willebrand ◽  
Saad B. Omer

AbstractBackgroundCOVID-19 outbreak is spreading globally. Although the risk of infection in the US is currently low, it is important to understand the public perception of risk and trust in sources of information to better inform public health messaging. In this study, we surveyed the adult US population to understand their risk perceptions about the COVID-19 outbreak.Methods and FindingsWe used an online platform to survey 718 adults in the US in early February 2020 using a questionnaire that we developed. Our sample was fairly similar to the general adult US population in terms of age, gender, race, ethnicity and education. We found that 69% of the respondents wanted the scientific/public health leadership (either the CDC Director or NIH Director) to lead the US response to COVID-19 outbreak as compared to 14% who wanted the political leadership (either the president or the Congress) to lead the response. Risk perception was low (median score of 5 out of 10) with the respondents trusting health professionals and health officials for information on COVID-19. Majority of the respondents were in favor of strict infection prevention policies to control the outbreak.ConclusionGiven our results, the public health/scientific leadership should be at the forefront of the COVID-19 response to promote trust.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla I. Galaviz ◽  
K.M. Venkat Narayan ◽  
Olivia C. Manders ◽  
Gabriela Torres-Mejía ◽  
Shifalika Goenka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document